You seem to have the same antinomian philosophy of the Romans. Get saved, sin all you want, because the more you sin the more grace will abound.
I see you are using the Webdog mo. You will not be able to find a single post on here where I say that it is okay to sin and that we should actually sin. I will agree with Paul that is foolishness. Now please in the future deal with what I say please.
Let me make this ABUNDANTLY clear again. We are not saved and then free to sin. There are penalties and consequences for sin. Sometimes these can even be extremely severe in nature. We are no longer slaves to sin. That doesn't mean we "won't" be slaves to sin. It simply means we don't have to be slaves to sin any longer.
Can a Christian sin. Yes. Can a Christian revert back to a lifestyle of sin. Yes. Will they be rewarded with a place in the kingdom of Christ as some Christians think. No.
I believe your conjectures are foolish
Well as I have said to many others you are certainly more than welcome to that opinion. But that's all it is.
1. As I have said many times before there is no such thing as one who "is not really saved."
In speaking of eternal salvation that is absolutely true. And I have always agreed with that statement. You are either saved or you are unsaved. No other option.
2. There is the lost and the saved; there is no inbetween position. You decide which group you belong to.
Actually here is part of the problem. There is not lost and saved. There is unsaved and saved. Lost does not equate to unsaved. There is nowhere in Scripture that makes that connection. If so please give me some examples.
3. A saved individual will be a changed individual.
I agree with the statement, but not in the way you use it based on your following statements. A saved person is changed in that they are no longer male or female, Jew or Greek. They are simply a part of the one new man in Christ. They are a new nation. It doesn't have anything to do with a changed lifestyle.
He will produce fruit in his life. There will be change in a believer's life however little it may be.
That just simply isn't true. There is no Scripture to back that up. All that is is a backloaded works doctrine that keep people from moving on because they are constantly worried if they are doing the right things and if they are doing enough of the right things. It's a works-based salvation that just puts the works on the back end of the equation.
If you put works in the grace by faith equation mistakes will ALWAYS be made. Works are NEVER in that equation, prior to, during or after. NEVER. Apart from works, means apart from works.
4. A person with no change, no fruit, is not saved. So why start with a false premise?
Well I would ask you the same question. That's not what Scripture says, so why start with a false premise?
5. Having said that, you are not to judge. You are not the judge of the hearts of mankind. You cannot set yourself up in the place of God and peer into the hearts of man. Oftentimes there is fruit that we cannot see. But God sees the heart. We don't know all the circustances. "Who are you to judge another man's servant?"
Again another accusation that is baseless. Please tell me where I have judged anyone. I have made no statements about anyone's fruit or lack there of. I have made general statements about Christians who do produce fruits and who do not. Again if you want to accuse then please provide evidence along with the accusation or don't accuse.