..... precisely what sin is and/or is not?
I'm trying my best to determine exactly how any/all practice(s) with which I'm familiar are "sins" and which aren't.
Most of you have read, either here on BB or elsewhere, where someone declares that practice X is merely a cultural thing, and thus has absolutely, positively no bearing to us today.
OTOH, I've read (& you probably have too) where some preacher declares that same practice X to be a sin for which one will account at the Bema Judgment Seat of Christ.
Obviously, BOTH cannot be correct.
EXAMPLE: Most conservative, evangelical Christians would probably be satisfied with a female having a hemline that extends to at least her knees.
OTOH, "Giants" of years gone by (e.g., Spurgeon, Moody, etc.) probably would be shocked if a female would so much as to dare to expose her ankles in public.
So......Who's correct, and, by default, who's wrong in matters such as this?
I'm trying my best to determine exactly how any/all practice(s) with which I'm familiar are "sins" and which aren't.
Most of you have read, either here on BB or elsewhere, where someone declares that practice X is merely a cultural thing, and thus has absolutely, positively no bearing to us today.
OTOH, I've read (& you probably have too) where some preacher declares that same practice X to be a sin for which one will account at the Bema Judgment Seat of Christ.
Obviously, BOTH cannot be correct.
EXAMPLE: Most conservative, evangelical Christians would probably be satisfied with a female having a hemline that extends to at least her knees.
OTOH, "Giants" of years gone by (e.g., Spurgeon, Moody, etc.) probably would be shocked if a female would so much as to dare to expose her ankles in public.
So......Who's correct, and, by default, who's wrong in matters such as this?