you can't produce Scripture to prove that a Christian will produce a thousand years in hell.
Well we've drawn SFIC out of hiding, and all he has to say is the same nonsense that everyone else has to say imagine that. Blah . . . blah . . . blah . . .
SFIC I will make the same offer to you that I've made to everyone else (which by the way still not a single person has taken up the offer - wonder why that is). If you think I am so wrong and you want to share the Truth with me you are more than welcome to PM and show me where I have gone wrong. Will you step up to the plate, because none of the rest of your buddies have.
By the way I have given Scripture evidence as has a number of other folks in previous threads, so your accusations are without merit. But why should that stop you, huh.
Just as you told HBSMN and others that they should be able to prove their stance, you should be able to prove yours.
I can and I have. I'm still waiting for all your folks that blow so hard about how wrong I am to step up to the plate and show me in Scripture where I am failing. Yet nobody wants to do that. Everyone wants to jump on the bandwagon, but nobody wants to do anything but blow hot air. But I'm still waiting.
As of yet, I have seen nothing coming from your text but insults and idiocy.
Some of your selective reading taking over again I see
Prove by Scripture your claim that the Child of God will spend a thousand years in hell, or quit trying to belittle others.
Again why don't you just prove how I am wrong. You don't agree with me. You aren't going to agree with me whether I show you Scripture or not, so why do you want me to waste me time showing you something that your mind is already set against. Why don't you just prove your point. It shouldn't be that difficult, but yet once again all you all do is blow hot air and try to have someone that you don't agree with and aren't going to agree with waste their time instead of just showing the Truth.
Here's how illogical your argument is. When the government teaches people about counterfeit money they do so by having the students study the "real" thing. They never introduce counterfeit into the learning process. They only deal with the "real" thing so that when the counterfeit comes along they are able to recognize it.
But what you are doing is saying "we have the real thing, but we don't want to deal with the real thing we only want to deal with the counterfeit."
What you should be saying is you are wrong and here is how you are wrong. But for some reason all you want to do is toot your horn about how wrong I am. Be a Truth provider and let's see some of your Truth. Quit ducking the issue and produce the goods.