Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
More proof that a flat tax is the only way to go. How do you make? Take X% and send it in. No matter your income level.
I also believe that nobody making under $20,000 a year should have to pay taxes. Period.
The whole thing is sickening. Our country is so far away from what the founders' intended...pretty sad.
# 1 The Electronic tax is the best - much better than the flat tax.
# 2 Everyone - individual and organizations (businesses, charities, ect) - should all pay taxes. PERIOD.
# 3 I do agree, the whole thing is sickening - we (the govt) are spending way too much. We must cut many programs.
>Should she be able to declare her children as dependents if her parents are the ones actually providing for the majority of their needs?
OK, then the IRS should have had them all file amended returns with the parents claiming the deductions.
Just happenstance that the IRS claimed that 13K was owed? Under $10K and the mother could have filed in IRS small claims court.
The action against he would be suspended, no lawyer would be needed, and she could have presented her case directly to an IRS lawyer. Been there, done that. Very interesting.
Very good post. In a sense, we are all responsible in a way for this situation. This is a byproduct of we the people that keep electing the thieves and thugs of the Democratic and Republican parties back into power on alternatiing schedules. They steal from us daily and we still keep reelecting the slobs.May the judgements of God come against this agency and any other such agency that targets the poor, the homeless, and the fatherless! There aught to be requirements for reimbursement for a person's expenses when false charges results in defense or expert consultants..... with punishment penaltys added to such agency's expenses.
GWB and BHO and congress will bailout and revitalize the losses of the rich.... but nothing is there to encourage the poor.... unless it is to encourage them to greater poverty....
May God have mercy on all of us who have allowed such things to develop without watching and realizing what's been happening around us until it advanced to the point that it is now either too late or almost too late!
Yes, and it is possible there are green Martians with pink polka dots.Do we know that this was not the case?
And that this woman and her parents were not simply stubborn and refused to do so?
Is it possible that her parents already were not paying any tax on their return and so it would have been of no additional benefit to them to declare the kids as their dependents?.
There is enough information in the news article to bring out the true character of the IRS.That depends on your local small claims court - here the limit is more like $2,000 - you are making too many broad stroke assumptions.
Whoop-tee-do and baloney. Just because you had no problems as a middle man to the IRS does not in any fashion give them a reasonable demeanor. I just retired from the government after 36 years in various agencies, and have seen this happen too many times. The IRS is ruthless, and is a reflection of the people that wrote the laws that support them, thugs. This article is very typical, and rings much more true than 20 years of playing kumbaya with the IRS.I was in private practice for over 20 years as a CPA and dealt with the IRS many many times on behalf of my clients. Not once was it ever necessary to go to any court.
If one behaves like a rational and polite person the IRS can be very reasonable to work with - without simply giving in to their position on a particular tax issue.
And you seem to be forgetting that those who write the laws get their power from we the people, including the family in the article. They work for us.Some seem to be forgetting that it is Congress that writes the tax laws. The IRS is merely their collection and enforcement agency.
I agree 100%. If one thinks about it, how ridiculous is it to hire someone to allow you to give away the money you earned to an entity that is either going to steal or squander it. It will be spent on anything but serving the American people.Yes, the congress enacts the laws and the IRS enforces them. However, if I am not mistaken, it is the IRS who enacts the fees and penalties and interprets the law (which is nebulous at best and I believed designed to be that way.) One shouldn't have to hire an enrolled agent to represent them. The tax law should be simple enough for anyone (of reasonable intelligence) to understand.
That is a total mischaracterization of the average American taxpayer. Your post is the exception, those who want to deceive, or avoid responsibility. It is easier to paint a picture of an honest taxpayer paying his or her fair share, than it is to imagine the IRS being a reasonable, level headed agency.The OP excepted, people most often hate the IRS because it reminds people of their responsibilities. No one likes paying taxes, and we look for every reason or excuse not to. It's easier to paint a mental picture of the IRS being evil than it is to be responsible and pay what we owe.
I am still curious...
Would each person's response to the OP be the same if it were found that this individual had understated her income as the IRS thought may have been the case when deciding to review her return?