I would say it has to do with the posting standards. I don't mean this as an insult, but the majority of posts that go on here are assertions, people speaking past each other. Seldom is a subject actually dealt with. Also, there seems to be a laziness about this board(i'm one of them). A good topic comes up, and we already discussed it 2 times before, and most of us just think, "What's the point in going over this AGAIN?".
Think of the Lordship Salvation topics. Basically, me,SFiC, Brother Bob and a few others, way back in the day, had talked about repentance. I did an exhaustive historical study. EXHAUSTIVE. I went through all of the great evangelists I could think of, and looked at how they preached repentance. Sent out the challenge that people who were going for the definition of repentance that's rather new, if they could show me ANYONE in Church history, any confession, and creed, who defined repentance in the way they have, BEFORE 1850 with Charles Finney. Did this receive any response?
What happened? *crickets*
No response. No one has yet provided me with a quote from church history that defines repentance the way that modern evangelicalism has. Does this prove Lordship Salvation? Not at all. But it should be a cup of cold water in the face and cause us to study up.
I think if we raise the bar on our posts, and not just make empty conjectures, we can see the BB flourish once again.
ps. I speak to myself too, i've been guilty of throwing out a few lines here and there. It's pure laziness.