Literally hundreds of differences between 2 editions, and not all "printer errors"
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I am a KJBO Independent Fundamental Dispesationlist Baptist
- Thread starter KJB1611reader
- Start date
37818
Well-Known Member
In the New Testament not hundreds. A few per page.
The Text Critical English New Testament.
With the Byzantine base mainly being the common text between all known New Testament variant readings.
Last edited:
The present KJV is no-more perfect than its early editions. I recently pointed out a glaring error in the KJV for which you had no real answer, & you still insist it's perfect ! WOW !
KJB1611reader
Active Member
There is no errors.
The truth remains that there have been actual errors in many of the many varying editions of the KJV.
An error is still an error regardless of whether it was supposedly introduced by a typesetter, printer, editor, or translator.
No KJV-only advocate has proven that all the actual errors in the 1611 edition of the KJV was the fault of the printer.
Here is an example of a new error that was introduced into some 1980's and afterwards editions of the KJV.
Joshua 13:14
the tribes of Levi (1982 Delair) (1985 VB) (1987 PSI) (1987, 2001, 2002 TN) (1989 CSSB) (JVIPB) (2003 EB) (2004 World) (2005 ICC) (2006 PP) (2008 Pilot) (2010, 2015 Baker) (2010 BRO) (1979-2, 1996, 1998, 2010, 2013 Holman) (APB) (2011 AMP) (2011, 2012 Barbour) (2011 PJB) (HKJVSB) (2012 F-S) (2012 WSB) (2013 CC) (2014 NGB) (2015 KAPPA) (2016 DBW) (2022 SKJV)
the tribe of Levi (1769 Oxford, SRB) [1629, 1769 Cambridge, DKJB] (2014 HKJVSBps)
KJB1611reader
Active Member
Also 1611.
MMRRPP ! WRONG ! I just pointed one out !
So, Roman soldiers are going to pounce on those that don't change their minds? As in:
Acts Chapter 3
23 | And it shall be, that every soul that shall not hearken to that prophet, shall be utterly destroyed from among the people. |
KJB1611reader
Active Member
This is about Jesus.
Yes. It's ultimately about the coming of the son of Man in vengeance upon 'that generation' that murdered Him and persecuted His church in the form of the Roman invasion and the horrific civil war that killed more Jews than the Romans.
Vengeance is mine saith the Lord. I’m reminded of the Roman dictator Sulla in his epitaph, “ No friend ever served me, nor enemy ever wronged me,
Whom I’ve not repaid in full.”
Whom I’ve not repaid in full.”
I clearly pointed out a glaring error for which you have no reply. The CHRISTIAN thing to do is to admit your mistake, not just stay silent about it & hope it'll go away, because it WON'T !
37818
Well-Known Member
A specific identity of an issue should ideally restated.
The goof is "Easter" in Acts 12:4.
37818
Well-Known Member
Tyndale, 1534, Act 12:4, . . . to be kepte entendynge after ester to brynge him forth to the people.
His invention o the word Passover was not correctly used in 1611.
When in fact it was throughout the Bible in 1560.
KJB1611reader
Active Member
Easter is right.
No, it's NOT. History proves it's not, & GOD shapes history.
KJB1611reader
Active Member
If its not pagan; Easter happendd after passover.
You ignore, avoid, or dismiss what the KJV itself teaches. At Ezekiel 45:17, the KJV acknowledged that the term or name "Passover" can be used for the seven day feast of unleavened bread. At Luke 22:1, the KJV teaches that the feast of unleavened bread is called the Passover. Luke could use the Greek term for the Passover at Acts 12:4 with the same meaning as he used it at Luke 22:1. The seven day feast of unleavened bread which can be called the Passover was not over in Acts 12:4.
37818
Well-Known Member
Was right, when Tyndale first used the term in his English translation from the Greek.