Search results

From the Greek text of Erasmus after Erasmus introduced the reading "book" into his text from Jerome's Latin Vulgate.

In other words, you are admitting that God has not chosen to keep editions of the KJV from having errors. Errors can still be found in the many varying editions of the KJV today.

The imperfect Latin Vulgate by Jerome got "book" as either a copying error or a translation error. It is inconsistent and wrong to use the imperfect Jerome's Latin Vulgate to make changes to the preserved Greek New Testament text.

You did not answer the questions that you were asked. You fail to back up and prove your human KJV-only opinions to be true and scriptural.

Are you admitting that KJV editions for 200 years [from 1638 until 1838] were wrong? If KJV editions were wrong for 200 years according to your assertion, you make no positive, clear, sound, coherent, convincing, true, and scriptural case for suggesting that they should be blindly accepted as...

Does your human opinion establish your claims as being right or correct? Are you suggesting that you are the authority concerning the word of God in English? Do you ignore the clear parallel between the three of 1 Corinthians 13:13 [faith, hope, and love] to the same three in Hebrews 10:22-24...

Concerning Hebrews 10:12, KJV-only author David Daniels asserted: “So the King James rightly said Jesus’ one sacrifice for sins was forever. The Geneva instead says that Jesus offered one sacrifice for sins, then set down forever. But anyone can see this is false, when we compare it to Stephen’s...

You blindly trust Will Kinney's biased, misinformed KJV-only opinions. The Greek at Hebrews 10:23 was not corrupted. Do you ignore the parallel between the three of 1 Corinthians 13:13 [faith, hope, and love] to the same three in Hebrews 10:22-24 [faith, v. 22; hope, v. 23; love, v. 24]? In...

You have in effect made human KJV-only opinions your final authority since you do not demonstrate from the Scriptures themselves that they teach those opinions. You have at times rejected the stating of the truth. Would God give a spirit of fear of the truth (2 Timothy 1:7)?

God gave His perfect word by a miracle of direct inspiration to the prophets and apostles. That process of the giving all Scripture by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles ended with the completion of the New Testament. God did not promise that post-NT translating would be by a...

The rendering "whom he" was not first introduced by a printer at Oxford. It was found in 1613 and 1616 London KJV editions by the king's printer, and it was also in the standard 1629 Cambridge edition and in the standard 1638 Cambridge edition. It is likely from those two standard Cambridge...

Your uninformed or misinformed opinion does not prove it to be right.

The claimed Greek support was actually a later printed Greek text that had reprinted the text of Erasmus. That is not independent evidence since it was merely a reprinting of the text Erasmus translated from an edition of the Latin Vulgate.

Your human opinion is not scripture. The KJV is not right because you say so. You are advocating human KJV-only opinions that are not taught in Scripture. According to the Scriptures, it can be concluded that sound true faith would not come from believing or following opinions...

KJB1611reader, you seem to trust blindly one-sided, biased sources that ignore and dismiss some of the facts including statements made by Erasmus himself. John Nordstrom maintained that Erasmus acknowledged in his annotations that he had translated the last six verses of Revelation 22 from...

John Nordstrom maintained that Erasmus acknowledged in his annotations that he had translated the last six verses of Revelation 22 from the Latin Vulgate, but that the printer did not choose to print that note in the printed edition. John Nordstrom asserted: “This omission can be verified by...

You are not getting anywhere because you have been misinformed and you choose to dismiss and reject the truth. You were and are wrong about Erasmus' Greek text. The truth does matter even though you try to suggest that it does not.

Your incorrect accusation is not true. You refuse to deal with the actual truth. You in effect accuse Erasmus himself of lying when he himself acknowledged translating from Latin into Greek a few times. KJV defender Edward F. Hills listed several renderings in the KJV that Erasmus added to...

You make a false accusation. I did not claim that Erasmus did not make use of some Greek NT manuscripts. My true point is that he added some readings from the Latin Vulgate, and Erasmus himself acknowledged that fact. You demonstrate that you are misinformed or uninformed. John David...

The translators of the 1560 Geneva Bible gave an English rendering for the Hebrew noun "saron" while the KJV translators transliterated it, making it a proper noun.