• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Should members give money to their church?

Status
Not open for further replies.

JerryL

New Member
BaptistBeliever said:
This is from a Biblical concordance. It's unbelievable how legalistic this topic is. I would expect that goods were used in trade very often instead of hard money which the people of Israel probably had very little of.

OK. I give up. I agree that every Christian is commanded by God in the Bible to give 10% of their crops or animals killed while hunting to God. Hey, that means we all have to go out and buy a gun.
Now you are just making fun of God. The Bible doesn't say any such. You win, change God's word. Get all you can illeaglly from God's people, I care not. If they don't study and prove you, or anybody that teaches this, unfit, so be it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

JustChristian

New Member
JerryL said:
Now you are just making fun of God. The Bible doesn't say any such. You win, change God's word. Get all you can illeaglly from God's people, I care not. If they don't study and prove you, or anybody that teaches this, unfit, so be it.


I'm not making fun of God. I'm making fun of YOU.
 

JerryL

New Member
BaptistBeliever said:
I'm not making fun of God. I'm making fun of YOU.
Making fun of me being true to God's word while you are not? Okay. Edit God's word to anything you wish, it's ok. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
And since the Law was still in effect when the author of Hebrews said Levi paid tithes...
What?! :eek:

. . . and the tithes the Levites paid were 10% of the tithes they received...
The Levites did not pay tithes.
...which were food, It is obvious that Abraham gave food.
You're begging the question.

What is obvious is that Abram paid tithes of all, not just of the mess tent, and any reasonable man who comes to the passage without an agenda is compelled to conclude that "all" includes silver and gold.

Now as to your spoils of war mess . . . the Apostle equated Abram's tithe with the OT commandment. That pretty much settles it in my mind.
 

JerryL

New Member
Aaron said:
What?! :eek:

The Levites did not pay tithes. You're begging the question.

What is obvious is that Abram paid tithes of all, not just of the mess tent, and any reasonable man who comes to the passage without an agenda is compelled to conclude that "all" includes silver and gold.

Now as to your spoils of war mess . . . the Apostle equated Abram's tithe with the OT commandment. That pretty much settles it in my mind.
And also disannuls it with the rest of the Mosaic law. With that last statement, you are stepping on your own foot if you preach tithing for Christians. Don't stop at verse 12 in Hebrews 7, go on to at least verse 19.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Goldie

New Member
Since the Mosaic Law was between Israel and God only, and Tithing falls under this Law, not to mention the fact that it is no longer in effect as it has been replaced by the New Covenant, I'd say that no-one is obliged to give money to their church except that we are to "freely give, for freely ye have received". The Mosaic Law has been replaced by the Law of Christ. So if one feels led to give the church $1 or 50c or even $1000 - then there's nothing wrong with doing so, but to feel obliged to tithe 10% each month isn't scriptural. We need to keep in mind as well, that when giving, our right hand isn't supposed to know what the left hand is doing. What you give should be between you and God.
 

JerryL

New Member
Goldie said:
Since the Mosaic Law was between Israel and God only, and Tithing falls under this Law, not to mention the fact that it is no longer in effect as it has been replaced by the New Covenant, I'd say that no-one is obliged to give money to their church except that we are to "freely give, for freely ye have received". The Mosaic Law has been replaced by the Law of Christ. So if one feels led to give the church $1 or 50c or even $1000 - then there's nothing wrong with doing so, but to feel obliged to tithe 10% each month isn't scriptural. We need to keep in mind as well, that when giving, our right hand isn't supposed to know what the left hand is doing. What you give should be between you and God.
Amen. Welcome to the board, BTW.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
JerryL said:
And also disannuls it with the rest of the Mosaic law. With that last statement, you are stepping on your own foot if you preach tithing for Christians. Don't stop at verse 12 in Hebrews 7, go on to at least verse 19.
My point is that silver and gold were included in the tithe. Whether Christians are to tithe is another debate.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
I will say this, however, many of those who preach against the tithe do so not because of theology, but because of covetousness. Many of them would prefer the tithe to the NT standard. What one gives is a direct reflection of his love for Christ and the Gospel. 10% is begrudging in my mind.
 

JerryL

New Member
Aaron said:
I will say this, however, many of those who preach against the tithe do so not because of theology, but because of covetousness. Many of them would prefer the tithe to the NT standard. What one gives is a direct reflection of his love for Christ and the Gospel. 10% is begrudging in my mind.
That would be your opinion.
 
Aaron said:
Hebrews 7 the author specifically said "here man pay tithes.' Apparently the law was still being followed at that point.

The Levites did not pay tithes. You're begging the question.
Check your Bible again, I believe you will find they did. They tithed a tithe of their tithe to the High Priest.

What is obvious is that Abram paid tithes of all, not just of the mess tent, and any reasonable man who comes to the passage without an agenda is compelled to conclude that "all" includes silver and gold.
Scripture does not say the tithe was money. But again, since it was pre-law, and since Melchizedek was a Semitic-Canaanite king, many theologians beilieve that Abram was following a Arab custom and not tithing to his God.

Now as to your spoils of war mess . . . the Apostle equated Abram's tithe with the OT commandment. That pretty much settles it in my mind.
Great! Then the tithe to Melchizedek was food just as it was in the OT commandment.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
I see your problem, Standing. Too many trees in the way of your seeing the forest. :tongue3:
 
Aaron said:
I see your problem, Standing. Too many trees in the way of your seeing the forest. :tongue3:
What trees?

Focus, Aaron.

We are talking about tithes, not trees or forests.

Scripture clearly shows us, as Goldie pointed out, that tithes were required of Israel, not other nations.

That required tithe was never changed in the Word of God to include New Testament Churches.

That being said, the only tithe's outside of the Law were those of Abram to Melchizedek.

Melchizedek received tithes of the spoils of war, so if we are to apply the principle of Abram's tithe to Melchizedek to the Church, then the only time the Church is to tithe is when they go to war and win that war. The tithe is of the spoils of war.

Abram never was said to tithe his own property, so the Church is not required to tithe their own property. Also, when the Church does go to war and win, the Church must tithe of the spoils of war, not to the Church building, but to a king of a pagan land.

Still no answer why Isaac was not said to have paid tithes? or why Jacob was allowed to demand requirements be met of God first before he gave a tenth of all?

(btw... Jacob was never said to have fulfilled his promise although we do know that God did indeed bring him back to his land.
 

lbaker

New Member
Another point - if the Israelites gave money, what did they do when they and their family were supposed to eat that tithe - chow down on a tasty sheckel?
 
lbaker said:
Another point - if the Israelites gave money, what did they do when they and their family were supposed to eat that tithe - chow down on a tasty sheckel?
Exactly! Pro-tithers better start eating their money instead of putting it into an envelope.

Also, when putting it into the envelope, it is recorded as so-and-so gave such-and-such amount as a tithe. Defeating the 'do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing' command, eh?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top