Bingo! I wonder why?North Carolina Tentmaker said:Thats because nobody really cares what guys wear.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Bingo! I wonder why?North Carolina Tentmaker said:Thats because nobody really cares what guys wear.
Well obviously because us guys are more concerned the inner beauty of our fellow man’s mind and soul.abcgrad94 said:Bingo! I wonder why?
And ashamedly, many of "them" are just what you told your wife men in tights are. Sad to say, many male ballet dancers are not innocent of same.ajg1959 said:This thread is hilarious!!!
I cant say that I have ever seen a man wearing tights (except on tv)
My wife asked me one time "If women ballet dancers are called ballerinas?, then what are men ballet dancers called?"
I told her "homosexuals"
AJ
Oh wait a sec...I have been to live professional wrestling matches, and those guys wore tights!!!!
Deny it? May I sugest you do NOT get off the plane in San Franciso in tights.:tongue3:SaggyWoman said:![]()
Men in tights? Lusting?![]()
![]()
There's gotta' be at least a half-dozen jokes "rolling around inside" this thread, that I'm not going to pursue any further, for now!Don said:Little-known fact: wearing knee-high pantyhose under your socks will keep the socks from rolling around inside your combat boots, and help prevent blisters during long marches and/or field hikes.
No "joke" Ed, our football coach in highschool advised us to shave our ankles so the tape wouldn't pull the hair off your legs.EdSutton said:There's gotta' be at least a half-dozen jokes "rolling around inside" this thread, that I'm not going to pursue any further, for now!
Ed
Salamander said:But back to men in tights: why hasn't anyone, tried to, refute the evidences of "tights" being breeches, breeches being trousers, and trousers being pants?
No Doubt!I don't believe men should wear tights in the same manner women do. Women use them as leg covering when (for example) wearing a dress. I've told a man that I work with to wear tights under his uniform pants to help keep warm in the winter. Yes, believe it or not, it gets pretty cold in Florida. In the Northwest Panhandle, it's about the same as lake effect, so I've been told. The cold goes right through to your bones. To keep warm, no prob. For normal dress, that's just messed up.
I have often run across this issue.
My observations is clothing manufacturers make apparel to "fit" the gender, usually on the female side to be tight and revealing. Since about the early 80's it has been commonplace for even men, especially young men to wear tight fitting jeans.
I guess if anything should be gained in understanding of this issue is the more immorality runs on its rampage, the tighter and more revealing the clothing.
As far as the examples given from days gone by, I see no comparison to the issue in today's thinking. Henry the VIII wasn't revealing any sexuality, neither Sir Walter Raleigh.
The example of "Rocky" expresses nudity of the male figure and should be edited by its removal.
Isn't just plain sense to know if the clothing allows one to express sexuality as in to attract anyone is just plain wrong.
I know already my words will be taken and torn to shreds, it's just a common thing in this type of discussion for the ones who object to do so. Sad.
Let be the first to commend your Christian efforts to point out what you disagree with in such a kind and courteous manner.The problem isn't your words. The problem is that your thought processes are warped by your high-mindedness.