Uh... his sidekick was there at the conference...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/fir...-giant-teleprompter-telegraphs-obama-caution/
-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Tim Geithner--most dangerous man in US
- Thread starter rbell
- Start date
Uh... his sidekick was there at the conference...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/fir...-giant-teleprompter-telegraphs-obama-caution/
That may be true but we don't know who is behind O'bama rex.
I would venture a guess, observing his fruit. :tear:
Last edited by a moderator:
Uh... his sidekick was there at the conference...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/fir...-giant-teleprompter-telegraphs-obama-caution/
That's what I mean by you obviously didn't watch it, after his opening speech he paced the room and was not using a teleprompter as he addressed the issues and answered questions.
So he gave his sidekick a break... :thumbsup:
ray Marshall
New Member
I disagree. i think Geithner is just a puppet and O'bama rex is the puppet master. You know the one who remains hidden yet pulls the strings. I believe O'bama rex did the same thing with the so-called stimulus bill. Pelosi gave him just what he wanted but if the buffalo chips hit the fan he can always blame her.
to add to your comment: Have you heard of the, "Invisable government?" They are the grand designers of our government. Faceless men, these you memtioned are the puppets. If they don't won'tto carry out these treasonable acts: they will just find someone that will do their bidding. I wouldn't doubt that these stimulus packages weren't already a sure thing. These congressmen, treasury secretary, Pelosi, Barny Frank . etc, and other traitors who are suppose to defend our constitution. They take oaths and are liars to the people they swear to protect. They take oaths to another type of organizations. How many times are they liars to whom they obey or to the planners of our downfall as a constitutional free nation.
I'm glad.. his sidekick needed a break!! Whew.. I would hate to be worked like that....
ROFL... OH.. I kill me!
Humor suicide... What a way to go... :thumbs:
OK...if any of you doubted how dangerous this Fascist is...
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/04/01/business/econwatch/entry4911030.shtml
He won't rule out replacing more CEO's.
Remember what Fascism is, gang: Private ownership of the production process...but government control.
Congratulations to "the winners:" you all elected a Fascist...who is appointing more of them.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/04/01/business/econwatch/entry4911030.shtml
He won't rule out replacing more CEO's.
Remember what Fascism is, gang: Private ownership of the production process...but government control.
Congratulations to "the winners:" you all elected a Fascist...who is appointing more of them.
OK...if any of you doubted how dangerous this Fascist is...
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/04/01/business/econwatch/entry4911030.shtml
He won't rule out replacing more CEO's.
Remember what Fascism is, gang: Private ownership of the production process...but government control.
Congratulations to "the winners:" you all elected a Fascist...who is appointing more of them.
He didn't take over nor did he attempt to take over the production process. GM now has a new CEO and he already has plans to make the company profitable. I read somewhere that Caddy and Chevy will be the remaining two divisions and he will take them through a bankruptcy. This is a guy whose been there less than a week.
Sounds like the change at GM was needed...
He didn't take over nor did he attempt to take over the production process. GM now has a new CEO and he already has plans to make the company profitable. I read somewhere that Caddy and Chevy will be the remaining two divisions and he will take them through a bankruptcy. This is a guy whose been there less than a week.
Sounds like the change at GM was needed...
I'm sorry...but when the government goes into a company and forces a change in leadership...that is taking over.
Two things...
1. Geithner has explicitly said that he'll push others out if he sees the need. Does that not bother you?
2. You do realize, don't you, that if "receiving government help" is the parameter for ousting a private corporation's leader...that all corporations are at risk?
Economic Fascism: If it doesn't scare you, you either don't know history, or don't appreciate freedom like you should.
He didn't take over nor did he attempt to take over the production process. GM now has a new CEO and he already has plans to make the company profitable. I read somewhere that Caddy and Chevy will be the remaining two divisions and he will take them through a bankruptcy. This is a guy whose been there less than a week.
Sounds like the change at GM was needed...
It may or may not be what was needed. But that is not the Presidents call. The government could bail them out without giving and requirements. Doing so shows intent. And libbies want control over production. If you control leadership you control the whole. But in the end it is all unconstitutional.
I'm sorry...but when the government goes into a company and forces a change in leadership...that is taking over.
Two things...
1. Geithner has explicitly said that he'll push others out if he sees the need. Does that not bother you?
2. You do realize, don't you, that if "receiving government help" is the parameter for ousting a private corporation's leader...that all corporations are at risk?
Economic Fascism: If it doesn't scare you, you either don't know history, or don't appreciate freedom like you should.
Anyone who supports this but cried out about the patriot act shows they only wanted to bash Bush. They are not really worried about government efecting freedom.
Anyone who supports this but cried out about the patriot act shows they only wanted to bash Bush. They are not really worried about government efecting freedom.
That's a two way street Rev, you don't support this but was in favor of the union reduction measures the republican's tried. You guys have been against UAW and wanted those contracts void since day one. Well guess who approved those contracts on behalf of GM.
I'm sorry...but when the government goes into a company and forces a change in leadership...that is taking over.
Sure... Whatever you say...
Two things...
1. Geithner has explicitly said that he'll push others out if he sees the need. Does that not bother you?.
No... In this case it doesn't bother me because I see the necessity and reason for the action. I know you choose not to see any other view than yours and I will not try and change your perception.
That's a two way street Rev, you don't support this but was in favor of the union reduction measures the republican's tried. You guys have been against UAW and wanted those contracts void since day one. Well guess who approved those contracts on behalf of GM.
I am not nor have I ever been in favor of this or any government interference in business. Also I am not republican. Got it.
I am not nor have I ever been in favor of this or any government interference in business. Also I am not republican. Got it.
I wouldn't claim to be a Republican either... Those guys are really sinking in public perception... Sorry to insult you like that. :thumbsup:
It may or may not be what was needed. But that is not the Presidents call. The government could bail them out without giving and requirements. Doing so shows intent. And libbies want control over production. If you control leadership you control the whole. But in the end it is all unconstitutional.
Sorry it took me a while to look these up. The right is again being hypocritical saying things like Obama is taking "unprecedented" actions with GM and how the "libbies" just want to take over these companies. How quickly they forget the things they did. The Republican's just fired the CEO's of AIG, Fanny and Freddy. And in the case of Fanny and Freddie, not only did they fire the CEO, they chose the replacement. What a bunch of hypocritical liars...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122156561931242905.html
As part of the deal, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson insisted that AIG's chief executive, Robert Willumstad, step aside. Mr. Paulson personally told Mr. Willumstad the news in a phone call on Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the call.
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/sep2008/frfa-s08.shtml
The government’s choice of new chief executives to head the two firms it has taken over makes clear whose interests it intends to defend. Placed at the helm of Fannie Mae was Herbert Allison, a former vice-chairman at Merrill Lynch, and to head Freddie Mac, it tapped David Moffett, a former CEO at US Bancorp and current senor advisor to the Carlyle Group.
What I'm saying is perhaps it isn't the governments place to do these things. But don't pretend like Obama and the Democrats are the first to do it. Every Republican I saw on the tube today said this was "unprecedented". That is simply a bald faced lie. The Republican party started this trend and Obama just followed their example... Why can't they own up and stop pretending like the Democrats run things any differently than they did?
Sorry it took me a while to look these up. The right is again being hypocritical saying things like Obama is taking "unprecedented" actions with GM and how the "libbies" just want to take over these companies. How quickly they forget the things they did. The Republican's just fired the CEO's of AIG, Fanny and Freddy. And in the case of Fanny and Freddie, not only did they fire the CEO, they chose the replacement. What a bunch of hypocritical liars...
Can you respond to anything honestly? This response has nothing to do with the post you quoted. What is it with libbies and their inability to make legitimate comparisons?
What I'm saying is perhaps it isn't the governments place to do these things. But don't pretend like Obama and the Democrats are the first to do it. Every Republican I saw on the tube today said this was "unprecedented". That is simply a bald faced lie. The Republican party started this trend and Obama just followed their example... Why can't they own up and stop pretending like the Democrats run things any differently than they did?
So who is pretending? See when all you have is to point to others and what you think they did wrong you then you actually have no argument.
Last edited by a moderator:
I wouldn't claim to be a Republican either... Those guys are really sinking in public perception... Sorry to insult you like that. :thumbsup:
In general polls between Democrats and Republicans it typically runs neck and neck. The perception is about government in general not specific parties.
No... In this case it doesn't bother me because I see the necessity and reason for the action. I know you choose not to see any other view than yours and I will not try and change your perception.
You show an astounding ignorance as to Fascism and its danger to our economy.
That is scary.