What is a just alternative for people who sin against God's righteousness?...she will perish in the lake of fire because of her sins as God's righteous judgment against her.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What is a just alternative for people who sin against God's righteousness?...she will perish in the lake of fire because of her sins as God's righteous judgment against her.
But the reason for this is the unwillingness to look at the totality of what Scripture actually says. Your side pulls out a few words or verses but fails to look at it all.It seems we are mired down in the I'm right, you're wrong pit. I don't think any of us are going to change our minds, so I will not continue to post the same scripture again and again.
That was physical healing. It took no regeneration.I would like to know how you guys (Cal's) interpret what Jesus said about being "lifted up as the serpent was lifted up". When an Israelite looked upon the serpent and was healed, had God regenerated him first?
Your faulty foundation has led to questions that don't really make sense.Was he "able" to look upon the serpent because God first gave him faith? Was the person who looked upon the serpent elected to be saved? Were the ones who wouldn't look upon it the ones who God passed over?
I have asked that same question many times I did get some answers a while back but those answers only pushed the question back another level.Why do some people rebel, reject, disobey, etc, and some people accept? What is the difference?
Originally Posted by Me4Him
You said:
Joh 6:44 No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day.
==Those are Jesus' words, not mine.
Actually he didn't. He said he would draw "all" to him. In the context (if you actually read it), it is about Greeks wanting to see Jesus. So when he said he would draw all to himself, it is the context of all nations ... both Jews and Greeks. These things are sometimes easily missed by people looking to support a preconceived view, and it is why it is imperative that the text be studied in its context.Well Martin, Jesus also said he would draw all men to him.
John 12:32 And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me.
I think many of us have proven that we are in fact unwilling to do that. We are willing to look at the Scripture. Your side has some that are willing to look at the Scripture, but many are not. They trot out proof texts without argumentation or support.Amy, these guys are going to simply close their eyes and ignore any scripture that disagrees with their false doctrine.
I can't speak for others, and I don't pretend to read everything here, but I have yet to see any Scripture, much less dozens that disagree with what I believe. I am willing to listen, but you will have to come with more than you have so far.Yourself, many others and myself have presented dozens of scriptures that clearly disagree with what they believe. They simply wrest the meaning to suit themselves.
Why do some people rebel, reject, disobey, etc, and some people accept? What is the difference?
it seems likely what is not meant is that every last single individual
And there you have it. A proper interpretation of scripture is impossible unless I can read Greek and understand Greek grammatical rules. No wonder my theology has holes big enough to drive a truck through as Pastor Larry said. :BangHead:The word translated "all men" in John 12:32 is the accusative form of the Greek word πας (pas). The domain and/or scope of this word is determined by the context.
...yet Scripture equates spiritual life and death using this very example. Apparently it takes no "regeneration" prior to faith.Quote:
I would like to know how you guys (Cal's) interpret what Jesus said about being "lifted up as the serpent was lifted up". When an Israelite looked upon the serpent and was healed, had God regenerated him first?
That was physical healing. It took no regeneration.
I agree. But that doesn't tell us why they change. The question is: What changes them from loving darkness to loving light?I have posted this before, but I will do so one more time.
Jhn 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
It can't be more clear. If Jesus statement of why people reject Him doesn't satisfy you, then you need to pray and ask Him.
No it doesn't. REad John 3 again. It likens the lifting up of the serpent to the lifting up of Christ....yet Scripture equates spiritual life and death using this very example.
Yes, correct. To lift up either the serpent or Christ takes no regeneration at all, whether before or after faith.Apparently it takes no "regeneration" prior to faith.
Not at all. By comparing Scripture to Scripture, you can arrive at a proper interpretation. Again, just look at the context. It is about Greeks and Jews as groups, not about individuals.And there you have it. A proper interpretation of scripture is impossible unless I can read Greek and understand Greek grammatical rules. No wonder my theology has holes big enough to drive a truck through as Pastor Larry said.
So, here is the point, just because πας is used in John 12:32, one cannot just assume that it refers to every last human being. Language is not that rigid. To simply quote John 12:32 and then throw down the gavel is to do so prematurely. One must consider the larger context. The passage in John 12:27-36 comes right on the heels of John 12:20-26. This strange little section probably has something to say about how one should understand John 12:32.
Not at all. By comparing Scripture to Scripture, you can arrive at a proper interpretation. Again, just look at the context. It is about Greeks and Jews as groups, not about individuals.
By the way, to answer the idea that choice requires a free will:
When I go to a restaurant, I am free to order something that I do not like. But I will not order it because I do not like it.
In order for me to order that which I hate, I need a change of taste.
THe sinner loves his sin. he needs a change of will before he will choose the right.
Interestingly, in Exod 4:21, long before Moses goes to Egypt, the Lord says, “I will harden his heart so that he will not let the people go.” It tells us that God promised to harden Pharaoh’s heart before Pharaoh had the chance. This is significant. There is no doubt that Pharaoh hardened his heart, but God said “I will do it.”Take for instance Pharoah of Egypt. It is true that there are many verses where it says God hardened Pharoah's heart, a good argument for Calvinists. But there are also many that say Pharoah hardened his own heart.
First, “experience” is not authority. The Bible is. Second, Calvinists say that a man is free to do whatever he wants. That’s free will. Depending on the conversation, it might be denied, but always look for definitions.Calvinists argue that man does not have free will, when experience shows otherwise.
Again, this is often stated, but never yet shown from the Bible.The beliefs of Calvinism cannot be true simply because they make God contradict his own self.
So it wasn’t God’s will for Joseph’s brothers to sell him? The Bible says it was.They argue that it is God's will that a man disobey God's will.
Really?? So you can, but God can’t? Interestingly.For instance, I can harden someone's heart.
But God says that he raised Pharaoh up for this purpose to show his glory and that involved hardening. Your God isn’t big enough, it seems to me. You want to put God in a box of what he can and can’t do. I don’t buy that.God did not make Pharoah's heart incapable of being soft, of listening to God. In fact, if you read the story, at one time Pharoah admitted he had sinned.
the Bible says that man is blind, hard, ignorant, and calloused (Eph 4:17-19). It says that he is unable to please God (Rom 8). That seems a totally different picture than what you give.So experience shows a man has control over his own will and the attitudes of his heart. And this squares with scripture.