...include rejecting something and the need to be blinded to the truth?How does a spiritual corpse do anything?
Cheers,
Jim
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
...include rejecting something and the need to be blinded to the truth?How does a spiritual corpse do anything?
Cheers,
Jim
...include rejecting something and the need to be blinded to the truth?
These are hypothetical questions which make about as much as sense as the question, "Could God create a rock he couldn't lift?What if one is not granted to come to Christ?
Can they come anyway?
Just what needs to take place in this granting from the Father?
Does this mean that some are not granted?
These are hypothetical questions which make about as much as sense as the question, "Could God create a rock he couldn't lift?
The basic foundation of his questions were false and unbiblical. Therefore they are not proper questions. Why waste time on such foolish controversies.The Calvinist view assumes God only draws some but not others. The claim would like, the gospel preached to a multitude of people say 10,000, God draws 5,000 to believe and the rest God isn't interested in drawing. A man can have head knowledge of God and His Word but not be saved. Even worse that they do not ever come to Christ but they were strongly influenced by the gospel, even to the point where people thought they were christians, how does Calvinism explain that in light of God drawing a person to Christ, since all whom are said to be drawn must inevitably believe?
Darren
The basic foundation of his questions were false and unbiblical. Therefore they are not proper questions. Why waste time on such foolish controversies.
Look back at the questions which were asked.Its not a foolish controversy and asking the question shouldn't be a waste of time. How does Calvinism deal with the fact that hearing the Word of God brings about faith to believe and follow God. According to the Calvinist position they need to be regenerated for the Word of God to have any effect, that to me is a contradiction since the Word of God does have power, through the Holy Spirit and to convict the sinner of their need of Christ and their position of sin (..etc); the Word of God draws the sinner to Christ. So then Calvinism adds a sub section saying the Word of God only has power IF on the condition the sinner has first been regenerated.
Its a significant factor to take into account I think....
Darren
Look back at the questions which were asked.
What if one is not granted to come to Christ?
Can they come anyway?
Just what needs to take place in this granting from the Father?
Does this mean that some are not granted?
Since he asked questions that have no biblical basis and foundation then the rest is mere speculation and controversy.
I do not think it is for us to assume anything and that we know the heart of a person and who is saved and who is not. The judgment belongs to God. I believe the Bible teaches that there will not be some in heaven whom we may expect to be there.Well I think its a stalemate because how can we ever know who is and who isn't granted? The same for regenerated or not regenerated? I believe its the position of Calvinism that they don't know the identity of the elect anyway, so its not a question Calvinism would ask.
For me the issue is how to view those whom don't respond although they were given the gospel. A lot thoughts come to mind from both camps.....
I acknowledge what scripture teaches, that the Word of God (the gospel) is the method God has ordained to bring about salvation to those He has chosen. (I Cor. 1:20 or so)How does Calvinism deal with the fact that hearing the Word of God brings about faith to believe and follow God.
I don't know that your position is any different from the reformed position.According to the Calvinist position they need to be regenerated for the Word of God to have any effect, that to me is a contradiction since the Word of God does have power, through the Holy Spirit and to convict the sinner of their need of Christ and their position of sin (..etc); the Word of God draws the sinner to Christ. So then Calvinism adds a sub section saying the Word of God only has power IF on the condition the sinner has first been regenerated.
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.How do you deal with the fact that since the Word of God, the gospel, is necessary for salvation, that millions, or perhaps billions, of people will never get a chance to hear the gospel?
peace to youraying:
How do you deal with the fact that since the Word of God, the gospel, is necessary for salvation, that millions, or perhaps billions, of people will never get a chance to hear the gospel?
Why did God use a method (the spread of the gospel) that would take centuries to reach throughout the whole world, knowing that untold millions, perhaps billions, of people would live and die without ever having a chance to hear the gospel?
Why did God grant some the chance to hear the gospel, but did not grant others the chance to hear the gospel?I don't know that your position is any different from the reformed position.
That is, Holy Spirit works to convict the person of the truth of the gospel.
Perhaps the only difference I see is saying the "Word of God draws a sinner" apart from any work of Holy Spirit. It is Holy Spirit that "draws" to God. That He uses the Word of God to do so, doesn't change that He is the agent of drawing.
Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.
Mat 13:12 For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.
God gives light (truth) to every man, the most basic and simplistic being His revelation of Himself through creation and the conscience. But if man rejects even that basic truth which God has revealed, God will not give him any more truth.
If man accepts the truth that has been revealed to him, God will give him more truth. But God does not cast His pearls before swine.
Rom. 1:21+ teaches that every person has rejected the general revelation of creation. It says none seek for God, all have turned aside.Rom 1:21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.... God gives light (truth) to every man, the most basic and simplistic being His revelation of Himself through creation and the conscience. But if man rejects even that basic truth which God has revealed, God will not give him any more truth.
If man accepts the truth that has been revealed to him, God will give him more truth. But God does not cast His pearls before swine.
Romans 1:21 doesn't say that. You must be quoting another verse.Rom. 1:21+ teaches that every person has rejected the general revelation of creation. It says none seek for God, all have turned aside.
Therefore, your belief that God will give more truth if the man/woman accepts the truth of revelation found in creation is refuted by the very passage that you quoted.
peace to youraying:
God has revealed, God will not give him any more truth.
If man accepts the truth that has been revealed to him, God will give him more truth. But God does not cast His pearls before swine.
I know this is an Arminian principle, but not a biblical one.
First, you avoided answering the question. How do you deal with the fact that millions/billions of people will live and die without hearing the gospel since the gospel is necessary for salvation.This argument needs to be addressed on both sides. Calvinism teaches God simply showed no interest in saving those whom never heard the gospel, yet in the same breath there will be those whom heard the gospel but where not elect and were locked into rejecting the gospel because they were not regenerated.
Originally Posted by canadyjd: Why did God use a method (the spread of the gospel) that would take centuries to reach throughout the whole world, knowing that untold millions, perhaps billions, of people would live and die without ever having a chance to hear the gospel?
Again, you avoided the question.Since you know, love for you to share this nugget with me, thanks..
Originally Posted by canadyjd:Why did God grant some the chance to hear the gospel, but did not grant others the chance to hear the gospel?
Most of those of the reformed faith (with the exception of hypers) believe the gospel is to be preached to all since we do not know who are the elect.This doesn't explain that the gospel is to be preached to every creature not just those whom were supposedly elected to be saved.