The Archangel
Well-Known Member
The word was in the very documents the KJV was translated from. And men at that time were fluent in these languages.
I personally believe that the many promises of God to preserve the scriptures have been kept. If you want to argue that some other version other than the KJV is the true word of God, I will at least give you a listen, although I studied it quite extensively many years ago and it would be hard to change my mind.
I simply believe God is absolutely capable of keeping his word and did.
And I would have a great difficulty if I believed as you do that there is no "perfect version". How do you have faith in something you believe is corrupt? As Olegig asked, how do you know which parts are true and which aren't? This would absolutely destroy faith.
If you want to talk about "perfect" versions, then go to the Greek and Hebrew. So, translations--while not perfect--are good and quite sufficient. However, there are nuances, etc. that don't come through any translation.
If there is a discrepancy in any translation, or if you want to see the nuance in the original language(s), go to the original.
Unfortunately, you and Olegig (and the KJV only people) want to say the KJV has more authority (textually speaking) than the originals themselves. This is ludicrous.
Certainly one can prefer the KJV, but one cannot state that it is the only true preservation of God's word.
The Archangel