Yeah.
But on a more serious note, one rule I would like imposed and enforced is that the debate exclude any insinuations on the intelligence or intent of either side or on what certain doctrines make God out to be, and therefore its adherents to be.
That raises my hackles.
That other forum was primarily closed I think because one or both sides liked to say, "well, I wouldn't want that kind of God on my side, or what kind of God does that make your God" and such like trains of thought, which in turn elicited unkind responses and the fight was on, and considering how we had outsiders coming in every now and then to lurk around, the forum was discontinued.
I don't like saying the things I say either, I must confess, I would rather be friendly and gentle, but there are debaters here who just couldn't keep me that way. :tonofbricks:
What does "ton of bricks" really mean ?
I didn't want to use this ------> :BangHead:because I'm not angry right now.
I understand what you're saying and agree. Over in another thread, I got my salvation questioned today because I'm not a Calvinist. I don't like it one bit. I have never questioned the salvation of Cals even though I disagree. I expect the same respect.