I am posting this so as not to derail Paul 3144's thread on "The Five Articles of Remonstrance" where in reply to a question from Rippon he answered :
To which dr. fuss then replied:
So, the question is begged:
Is an elect, or for the benefit of those who dislike the word, a child of God, necessarily a true believer always and is someone who in the eyes of men and in accordance with the tenets of his church, is a true believer, necessarily elect or a child of God ?
Paul3144 said:Yes, I do. I also agree with the fifth in that if it were possible for a true believer to lose faith, such a person would not be saved. However, because it is impossible for a true believer to lose faith, that is hypothetical.
To which dr. fuss then replied:
drfuss said:So your definition of a true believer is one who does not lose faith. Then there is some doubt about if you are a true believer until it is demonstrated that you did not lose faith. Is that right?
So, the question is begged:
Is an elect, or for the benefit of those who dislike the word, a child of God, necessarily a true believer always and is someone who in the eyes of men and in accordance with the tenets of his church, is a true believer, necessarily elect or a child of God ?