The Archangel
Well-Known Member
But we are never told that we must turn from all sin to be saved.
So, then, are you saying you get to keep some of your favorite sins and keep on doing them? Is that what you are saying?!
The Archangel
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
But we are never told that we must turn from all sin to be saved.
So, then, are you saying you get to keep some of your favorite sins and keep on doing them? Is that what you are saying?!
The Archangel
That is not what I am saying whatsoever. The scriptures are clear that we are to depart from iniquity.
2 Tim 2:19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.
It is one thing to want to depart from iniquity, it is quite another thing to accomplish it. Let's say you have an alcoholic come into church and hears the gospel. They realize they are a sinner and receive Jesus as their saviour. Does this mean they can never have another drink again? Does their addiction suddenly disappear? I knew a man who used to drink heavily, after receiving Christ he said he never had the urge to drink again, but this is exceptional, most will struggle overcoming a sin like this.
What I am saying is that if you have to promise to never sin again, or even to say that you will instantly hate all sin before you can be saved, then I doubt anyone anywhere is saved.
Gluttony is a sin. If someone gets saved, do they have to promise never to overeat again? If they eat too much which is their habit, are they lost? Must they hate food?
Turning from sin (repentance) is not the same as to stop sinning. One is a decision to transfer ownership, the other is an action.Have you turned from sin 100%? Are there known sins you continue in?
Read these passages, in light of the "Cheap Grace" gospel, perpetuated by so many...
2Ti 3:1 But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty.
2Ti 3:2 For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy,
2Ti 3:3 heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good,
2Ti 3:4 treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God,
2Ti 3:5 having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.
Hmm. People in the last day, who will profess to know God, yet will deny the changing power of the gospel, and will engage willfully in all sorts of sinful behavior (and encourage others to do so!)...
Amazing, you interpret the verse to say exactly the opposite of what it really says. Verse 5 says they have "the appearance of godliness". In other words, these people will seem to be very moral and godly people. These are not people who appear to be willfully engaging in sin, no, just the opposite, most will probably believe them very religious and moral from appearances.
WHAT??! Brother, are you capable of reading? How are people who are openly "disobedient to parents" "Slanderous" (gossips) and "without self control" not "appear{ing}" to openly engage in sin?
I have to say, you must be young. Your reading skills have been heavily influenced by reader response, post modern philosophy.
In fact, your own interpretation disproves itself. If the "appearance" of godliness, is to not engage in open sin, this would apply to both the true and the false.
No, these are those, who, like in Matthew 7, say "God I have done all these miraculous ministerial works in your name" yet Jesus will say "Depart from me, you who have no law".
they will assume the form of godliness, to take away their reproach; but they will not submit to the power of it, to take away their sin. Observe here, (1.) Men may be very bad and wicked under a profession of religion; they may be lovers of themselves, etc., yet have a form of godliness. (2.) A form of godliness is a very different thing from the power of it; men may have the one and be wholly destitute of the other; yea, they deny it, at least practically in their lives. (3.) From such good Christians must withdraw themselves.
III. Here Paul warns Timothy to take heed of certain seducers, not only that he might not be drawn away by them himself, but that he might arm those who were under his charge against their seduction. 1. He shows how industrious they were to make proselytes (v. 6): they applied themselves to particular persons, visited them in their houses, not daring to appear openly; for those that do evil hate the light, Jn. 3:20. They were not forced into houses, as good Christians often were by persecution; but they of choice crept into houses, to insinuate themselves into the affections and good opinion of people, and so to draw them over to their party. And see what sort of people those were that they gained, and made proselytes of; they were such as were weak, silly women; and such as were wicked, laden with sins, and led away with divers lusts. A foolish head and a filthy heart make persons, especially women, an easy prey to seducers
Don't forget the rest of the epistle...
1Jn 2:3 And by this we know that we have come to know him, if we keep his commandments.
1Jn 2:4 Whoever says "I know him" but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him,
The simple truth is as believers, we have been given a new heart; we are indwelled by the Holy Spirit, and these things affect everything that we do. Anyone who can wake up, and say "Today I sin!" does not know Christ, and is not saved.
I concur, there is not doubt that the presence of God in our lives impacts what we do, what we think etc. But does His presence in the life of believer override our nature and tendency to sin and rebel? Is sin not a struggle in your life? If so, remind yourself of the scripture you "zinged" me with. I John 2:4.
This has nothing to do with the Free Grace (not cheap grace...how dare you put a price on our Savior's sacrifice!) soteriological position. Your hermeneutic is quite faulty lately, from MacArthur's book to now this.Read these passages, in light of the "Cheap Grace" gospel, perpetuated by so many...
2Ti 3:1 But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of difficulty.
2Ti 3:2 For people will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy,
2Ti 3:3 heartless, unappeasable, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not loving good,
2Ti 3:4 treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God,
2Ti 3:5 having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power. Avoid such people.
Hmm. People in the last day, who will profess to know God, yet will deny the changing power of the gospel, and will engage willfully in all sorts of sinful behavior (and encourage others to do so!)...
That was a good post Hank. :thumbsup:...
For the wandering Christian it can mean to re-think one's attitude about personal sin, which should result in a renewed walk with God and to cease from sin and grieving the Spirit and quenching His power in his (the Christian's) life. Otherwise God will chastise and/or judge (but not with the condemning judgment of the world) His child.
This has nothing to do with the Free Grace (not cheap grace...how dare you put a price on our Savior's sacrifice!) soteriological position.
Your hermeneutic is quite faulty lately, from MacArthur's book to now this.
No, but they will instantly turn from it. They will no longer desire to drink, although sin, that dwells in them (the old man) very well might still desire it, and cause the man to fall
I can honestly, and without reservation, say that I have felt guilt, shame, and hatred for every sin I knowingly committed since I became a Christian.
What is the difference in saying one must do such-and-such to be saved, or in saying if one is saved then one will do such-and-such?
And another thing, if repentance means to quit all sin, and we must repent to be saved, then doesn't this make salvation merited?
Originally Posted by Winman
And another thing, if repentance means to quit all sin, and we must repent to be saved, then doesn't this make salvation merited?
This is a moot point, since no one is saying this. Repentance is to turn from sin, not quit it.
Think of a crack addict. At first they enjoy the drug without reservation. At some point, they decide they no longer wish to be a drug addict. At this point, they are "turning" from the sin of drug use. If it is a true turning, it will have results (a continual effort to try to avoid wrong behavior); if it is not a true turning, but just emotionalism, it will not have an affect.
Biblical repentance (in terms of salvation) is turning from the world, and sin in general, to Christ. It is letting go of self, and taking hold of Christ. You cannot have true saving faith in Christ, while willfully holding on to your old life. This is not faith: it is nothing but emotionalism, and lip service.
But why do I have the feeling that if he did not turn from the drug addiction, you would deem him still lost?
It seems your 'turning from sin' does require an action.
It still seems Macarthur's position requires that a true conversion is shown by an action; therefore he is saying an action is needed for there to be a true conversion.
IMO this is backloading the gospel and has the feel of a hair tick crawling on my back.