D,
Again, it is the author of Hebrews who refers to this verse as the New Covenant people. Thus, we should not go into this text with presuppositions on what it means, but take the text in what it says. The text in Hebrews refers to this as the New Covenant and applies it to the New Testament Church. The text says:
Hebrews 8:13 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
He says Jeremiah refers to the New Covenant, not the Tribulation period and not the old covenant made with National Israel. The first part of Hebrews 8 talks about Christ's High Priestly work in redeeming people in the New Covenant. Is all National Israel in the New Covenant? No, this must refer to people before the Tribulation as it is the New Covenant. Look at Hebrews 9, he talks more about the Old Covenant then he goes back into the New Covenant and the work of Christ as High Priest. This is a constant comparison to the Old Testament Saints and the New Testament Christians.
In Chapter 7, we see the nature of the covenant when the author says, "This makes Jesus the guarantor of a better covenant." The better Covenant? The New Covenant.
Did this all happen to National Israel? No! It happened to Christians.
This is not replacement theology (a dispensational view) but Covenant Theology, which is distinct from dispensationalism and thus neither replacement theology nor traditional dispensationalism. We believe we didn't replace Israel, we are Israel and were planned as such from the beginning of time, we were grafted into Israel.
I think Hebrews 8 clearly shows in this context as being those who receive the New Covenant and is referring distinctly to New Covenant Believers, not Tribulation old Covenant renewals.
BTW, Romans says, "Not all Israel is Israel."
Again, it is the author of Hebrews who refers to this verse as the New Covenant people. Thus, we should not go into this text with presuppositions on what it means, but take the text in what it says. The text in Hebrews refers to this as the New Covenant and applies it to the New Testament Church. The text says:
Hebrews 8:13 In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
He says Jeremiah refers to the New Covenant, not the Tribulation period and not the old covenant made with National Israel. The first part of Hebrews 8 talks about Christ's High Priestly work in redeeming people in the New Covenant. Is all National Israel in the New Covenant? No, this must refer to people before the Tribulation as it is the New Covenant. Look at Hebrews 9, he talks more about the Old Covenant then he goes back into the New Covenant and the work of Christ as High Priest. This is a constant comparison to the Old Testament Saints and the New Testament Christians.
In Chapter 7, we see the nature of the covenant when the author says, "This makes Jesus the guarantor of a better covenant." The better Covenant? The New Covenant.
Did this all happen to National Israel? No! It happened to Christians.
This is not replacement theology (a dispensational view) but Covenant Theology, which is distinct from dispensationalism and thus neither replacement theology nor traditional dispensationalism. We believe we didn't replace Israel, we are Israel and were planned as such from the beginning of time, we were grafted into Israel.
I think Hebrews 8 clearly shows in this context as being those who receive the New Covenant and is referring distinctly to New Covenant Believers, not Tribulation old Covenant renewals.
BTW, Romans says, "Not all Israel is Israel."