This is equal to saying a doctor should not be allowed to be a doctor unless he is willing to perform abortions. Your logic is flawed
See above. It's not flawed.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
This is equal to saying a doctor should not be allowed to be a doctor unless he is willing to perform abortions. Your logic is flawed
The very fact that there are some here that supports the school shows how far off base our Christian heritage has gone.
Homosexuality is a sin.
Of course I'll be persecuted for that statement.
This is not about a university hiring a counselor - it is about a student in a university graduate program.
Do you believe that universities be allowed to exclude students based on their private beliefs?
Don't get a martyr complex. :laugh: It's just that the issue is more difficult than it seems to be on face value.
Being a licensed counselor requires the willingness to serve the general public.
From the ACA code of ethics:
A.4.b. Personal ValuesCounselors are aware of their ownand avoid imposing values that
values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors
are inconsistent with counselingparticipants.
goals. Counselors respect the diversity
of clients, trainees, and research
The very fact that there are some here that supports the school shows how far off base our Christian heritage has gone.
Homosexuality is a sin.
Of course I'll be persecuted for that statement.
How would anyone here council a Homosexual?
Would you tell them it was sin?
If so, would you be crossing the line according to ACA?
Where would your allegiance be? To God, or the ACA?
How would anyone here council a Homosexual?
Would you tell them it was sin?
If so, would you be crossing the line according to ACA?
Where would your allegiance be? To God, or the ACA?
Nope, you can be a Christian, refuse to counsel homosexuality, and be a counselor. This school has overstepped its bounds. No doubt about it.
Could you refuse to counsel a Muslim? A Jew? A Catholic?
Nice sidestep.
Let's phrase the question in another, perhaps clearer way. Should a university have standards on who it allows into a program and who is removed from a program?
What type of standard should be adopted?
Should religious beliefs, regardless of the religion be a factor?
Could you refuse to counsel a Muslim? A Jew? A Catholic?
According to standards for LPC licensing, you cannot impose such beliefs on a person and keep your license.
Have bilateral contract laws been recinded?
Would you as a Christian seek out a Muslim counselor?
Or would you take a pass and seek out a Christian counselor?
Why is it your right to choose who to associate with but not the right of others?
For pastoral counseling, I would seek a Christian.
For talk therapy, I am more interested in the theoretical orientation of the counselor, to be honest.
Regardless, it does not matter because my choice as a client is different from the therapist's choice.
Sure - a university can set whatever rules it wants - upfront.
Is that the case here?