1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Define fundamentalist

Discussion in 'Fundamental Baptist Forum' started by Luke2427, Sep 30, 2010.

  1. freeatlast

    freeatlast New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    10,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thank you for that information. It leads me to ask this. By the way I am serious with this question. If that is what defines a fundamentalist then can a fundamentalist also be liberal in his/her doctrine and walk? The reason I ask is because none of those definitions or explanations of the differences covers ones attitude toward holiness.
     
  2. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    Cassidy, I don't think it is debatable who knows more about the IFB movement as a whole. No one is contending that I know half of what you know about the IFB. I came up FWB and my segment of that movement fellowshipped a great deal with IFB churches. That is not the point here.

    The point, that surely you must recognize, is that there are THOUSANDS upon THOUSANDS of IFB people who are KJV only, who treat the SBC as an apostate movement, who preach standards for which they have no Bible, etc. Surely you must know this.

    To be honest, you have educated me to some degree. I am actually very happy to hear that on the other hand, there are many IFB's who are not as extreme. I knew there were some, but am glad to hear that there are many.

    This thread is not about them. This thread is about the many, many thousands who ARE legalistic and backwards who misrepresent the rest of us and do, in my opinion, more harm than good to the kingdom.

    Several others on this very thread, including Michael and Berean have expressed that this is their experience as well. This is not some weird coincidence. It is because this has been the experience of many. Many people, when they see on a church sign- INDEPENDENT FUNDAMENTAL- they immediately think of KJVO, legalistic, backwards philosophy.

    Now surely you recognize this point as valid. Surely.

    This thread is not about John R. Rice and people like him.

    This thread is about Sheldon Smith and Phil Kidd and Sammy Allen and the late Jack Hyles and many thousands like them.

    And it is not just about the IFB. This philosophy of theirs permeates FWB and AMB and many other Baptist circles.

    That's what this thread is about.
     
  3. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    My, my.....
     
  4. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    That would depend on your definition of "liberal." If by "liberal" you mean theological liberalism, I.E., Modernism, then they could not coexist as Modernism is diametrically opposite to the 5 points as enumerated.

    If by "liberal" you mean "somebody who does things differently than me" then, yes, the two could coexist. :)
     
    #104 TCassidy, Oct 4, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 4, 2010
  5. North Carolina Tentmaker

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2003
    Messages:
    2,355
    Likes Received:
    1
    Good answer TC. "Secondary Separation" is another problem with those in the militant wing of fundamentalism that you are opposed to.

    The idea that even if you are sound in your doctrine, your failure to condemn everyone I condemn is grounds to break fellowship.

    This is another dangerous false teaching for you.
     
  6. TCassidy

    TCassidy Late-Administator Emeritus
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    20,080
    Likes Received:
    3,491
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Well, I am not opposed to Militant Fundamentalism as long as that which we militate against is truly contra-biblical. However, what passes for militancy today is often just a preference elevated to a "conviction." In my theology a conviction must be enumerated in the bible. If the bible says do it, we do it. If the bible says not to do it, we don't do it. If the bible is silent on the subject, so are we. :)
    I agree. Anytime I try to elevate my preferences to the level of authority as that of the scriptures, I would then be an idolater. :(
     
  7. Luke2427

    Luke2427 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,598
    Likes Received:
    23
    So I take it that you yield.
     
Loading...