freeatlast
New Member
In 1 Timothy 3:1-13 it give the qualifications for Pastors and deacons. What do you feel should be some reasons why a church should ask a Pastor or deacon to step down or for them to resign on their own?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
The qualifications for deacon and pastor are listed for everyone to see, and before they were elected by a local church, that church examimed them. The whole premise of the thread is way off base. Why would you start a thread assuming an ordained deacon or pastor had done something or is doing something different in their life than when elected?In 1 Timothy 3:1-13 it give the qualifications for Pastors and deacons. What do you feel should be some reasons why a church should ask a Pastor or deacon to step down or for them to resign on their own?
SN, could you enlarge on that a little? Perhaps give us some examples?I would think one of the major reasons a person from such an office should resign is the inability to understand Scripture.
Yes, to be quite clear, in 1 Tim 3, two of the qualifications listed for overseer is the ability to teach and not a novice. It also says deacons must hold to the mysteries of the faith, and be tested. It seems that in other threads such as this, the emphasis is always on the dos and donts of the verses. Understanding Scripture in its context and the ability to know what God is saying to us while leaving out ones opinion is just as important as all the moral aspects of the ministry.SN, could you enlarge on that a little? Perhaps give us some examples?
Originally Posted by Jon-Marc: It is not just pastors and deacons who can go wrong. There are other in leadership or important positions in a church who can head down the wrong road and lead the church the wrong way.
When the elder is no longer "Blameless" (in other words, violates something on the list of characteristics/qualifications and will not repent/change) he has de facto forfeited the right to be an elder.
He just step down. Actually, he should repent and straighten out the situation as soon as its recognized. Only a major, continuous, willful breach of an area on that list should be considered significant for resignation.
The qualifications for deacon and pastor are listed for everyone to see, and before they were elected by a local church, that church examimed them. The whole premise of the thread is way off base. Why would you start a thread assuming an ordained deacon or pastor had done something or is doing something different in their life than when elected?
If the person has fallen into sin that disqualifies him according to Scripture, he will know it is time to resign. If the church must take action, it does not ask him to resign. The church elected the person, and the church can unelect the person in accordance with the local church bylaws.
I would think one of the major reasons a person from such an office should resign is the inability to understand Scripture.
I htink (think) you cannot spell or understand Scripture. Dr. Bob's post was exactly right, yours was not, as in other threads. You fail to realize that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. Pastors and deacons are human just like everyone else. Disqualification is based on one of the qualifications being violated in an ongoing manner, without repentance. That is not a lowering of standards.I htink you are living in a dream world. Pastors as well as deacons today do fall into temptations. The sad fact is that most churches today do not follow through on disciplin as they should.