If someone does yoga poses for stretching and burning calories only what would you call it?
Yoga burns less calories than ironing - it's not a great way to burn calories.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
If someone does yoga poses for stretching and burning calories only what would you call it?
Yoga burns less calories than ironing - it's not a great way to burn calories.
I'm sure your right, and I am not a fan of yoga myself. My only point is I know some people will do it for a physical benefit and not for any kind of mystical reasons whatsoever.
Sure, very few are going to teach anything one would recognize as Hinduism. But let me ask you, do they teach the movements purely as exercise, or are concepts of relaxation, clearing the mind, visualization or meditation included in the classes?
In Christian meditation a person tries to clam the mind, clear the mind if you will, so that God can talk to him/her. Meditation is listen for God to speak.
We in the West need to reclaim Christian meditation. Too many are afraid of the word and we have lost much in not practicing Christian meditation.
In honesty, I believe far too many Christians are afraid that God will speak to them and tell them something they do not want to hear. Just IMHO.
I'm sure your right, and I am not a fan of yoga myself. My only point is I know some people will do it for a physical benefit and not for any kind of mystical reasons whatsoever.
Why turn to "Yoga" no matter what it is under the label?
Why turn to "Yoga" no matter what it is under the label?
Here we may just have to agree to disagree. My view of Christian meditation would vehemently deny that it involves a clearing of the mind. I would hold that Christian meditation is an act of filling the mind with truth, not clearing it of anything. Filling it so much with truth that there is no room for untruth.
But I respect your view while very much disagreeing with it.
If all it is is another form of exercise (and nothing more), then why not use it? We shouldn't 'turn to' anything thing, true, but that applies equally to any form of exercise. Since I doubt you would use those verses to say we shouldn't exercise, then they are invalid for denying the use of a form of exercise called "yoga".
IOW, what is under the label IS important.
Of course, that also raises the question...If the direct physical benefit of yoga is extremely small for the amount of time and effort involved, then is it reasonable for someone to claim that they do it only for the physical benefit? I am not saying they are lying, but if the direct physical benefits of the forms are minimal, then it only emphasizes that calling the exercise alone 'yoga' is a non-standard usage.
I would disagree regarding the direct physical benefit of yoga. When the poses are done properly, there is significant strength and/or flexibility and balance involved. The core muscles are consistently engaged and other large and small muscles groups are used to transition and support. In my experience, the physical benefits are significant and supplement my other forms of exercise. If you don't think the poses are strenuous, come spend an hour and half with me on some Sunday afternoon and I can prove otherwise.
HOWEVER, I participate in no type of meditation. I am too busy trying to maintain form to think about anything else. If the term "yoga" involves meditation, then I am not doing "yoga".
If they are so strenuous why do they burn just about 200 calories in an hour? Just casual walking burns more than that.
Muscle tone.
Keeping muscles limber.
Keeping joints mobile.
Reducing muscle and/or joint pain.
Same reasons a person would take classes in palates, exercise classes, walking ... keeping the body in shape.
Of course, that also raises the question...If the direct physical benefit of yoga is extremely small for the amount of time and effort involved, then is it reasonable for someone to claim that they do it only for the physical benefit? I am not saying they are lying, but if the direct physical benefits of the forms are minimal, then it only emphasizes that calling the exercise alone 'yoga' is a non-standard usage.
Not sure of your point CTB.
But I think you have made mine.
My objection is the label ''yoga" and since there are these alternatives i.e. "Pilates" then why not choose the alternatives?
HankD
What's next out of SBTS, an expose of the dangers of the Special Olympics? (They're rooted in GREEK PAGANISM!)