Tom
Came across the following in a book I am currently reading:
"The Bible emphasizes human choice and the graciousness of God's offer without a hint of concern about the two being in conflict, so the burden of proof is upon any theological system that infers one exists. It is one thing to say that without the Holy Spirit's enabling we cannot believe, but it is another to say the Holy Spirit necessitates we believe. Simply put, the doctrine or "irrestible grace" renders incomprehensible major portions of the Bible. Scripture gives to many examples of persons successfully resisting God's grace."
Yeah, I heard somebody ask an old preacher one time how he resolved the conflict between God's sovereignty and man's will. He answered, "Well, I didn't know they had a falling out."
I'm with you most of the way through the quotation. Then it's a matter of semantics. I would not say that the Holy Spirit's enabling grace means one
must believe. It means one
will believe. That, to me is consistent with Romans 8:28-29, where Paul says those whom God calls he justifies. I read that to mean
all those whom God calls, he justifies.
Yes, all whom God justifies, he has called. But that leaves room for the view that some who are called are not justified because they did not respond in faith. That's not what Paul said, however.
No Calvinist denies that a man, in his fallen state, resists the Holy Spirit. Always. So why did you and I, one day, stop resisting, and freely repent of sin and trust Christ for salvation? I believe it is that enabling grace.
And it is a grace that does not necessitates belief, but assures belief, willingly exercised. Because a sovereign God gave us a heart of flesh to replace our heart of stone.
We were not saved against our will.