• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

"all have sinned"

Status
Not open for further replies.

slave 4 Christ

New Member
OK, if I understand you correctly, you are trying to find out how the "all" in Romans 3:23 means that babies are guilty of sin from conception, is that right? (For this post, I'll assume I am correct...if I'm incorrect, I'll write another post).

First off, the passages you quote are different genres. Paul is, obviously, writing in an epistolary form in which he uses "diatribe" to make his points. Paul is making arguments and answering his own proposed questions.

The Gospel of John is not epistolary; it is Gospel and as such it is much closer to strict narrative (in genre).

Second, the word "all" is always qualified by context. In the Romans passage, Paul is making the point that both Jew and Greek (or everyone without exception) is a sinner. We see this in v. 9. From v. 9, Paul moves on to buttress his argument by quoting Old Testament passage which, regardless of their original context, are used to demonstrate that "all" are sinners. By the time we get to v. 23, it is clear that Paul is making the charge that the Law applies to both Jew and Gentile and that both Jew and Gentile alike have transgressed the Law and are sinners. Or, to put it more simply, there is no distinction between Jew and Gentile--both are sinners.

In the John 3:16 passage, the word "all" is qualified and governed by the word group it is found in. In fact "whosoever" is not present and is an errant hold-over from the KJV translators who simply got this wrong (but because it is a beloved verse, most translators are reluctant to change it). The literal translation is "all the ones believing..." Because "all" appears as part of a phrase it is governed by that phrase and derives its meaning from the context, just as the "all" of Romans 3:23 means "Jew and Gentile."

So, your question seeks an answer which cannot be found in the verses you posted. However, implication can be made from these very same verses.

Implication 1: No one is righteous and all are sinners. Paul, here, makes no statement to how we become sinners. He is stating a simple fact. He is using the Aorist tense to see sin, not as individual acts, but as a summarized, completed action. Again, the individual acts here are not in view, but we can surmise that there are any number of examples of "sins" that are committed that we are guilty of.

Implication 2: Only those believing in Christ will be forgiven of their sins. John is making this point in his Gospel, especially in 3:16. The salvation is not universal; it is limited. In the text alone, only those believing in Christ will be saved.

One must read further in Paul (Romans 5) to get at the answer you are looking for. Once Romans 5 is examined, it might be said that Romans 3:23 is suggesting that we are sinners from conception.

Romans 5 clearly states that "all sinned" and as a result, death spread to all men. Now, if Paul had stopped here, I would agree that we are sinners because we sin and we are not born with sin-guilt. However, Paul doesn't stop here...he continues to explain what he means.

Sin was in the world before the Law.
Does this refer to Adam and Eve's sin? If so, does it refer only to their sin?

Sin is not counted where there is no Law. This is important. Technically, those after Adam and Eve could commit no sin because there was no Law to break. Obviously, we, from the rest of Scripture, know that incest, murder, rape, and all other forms of sin we see in Genesis are wrong. But the people in, say, the time of Abraham had no Law and were, therefore, not breaking it and, therefore, were not sinning.

From our temporal standpoint, we can say they were, in fact, sinning. God Himself would likely say they were sinning (the flood, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, etc.). However, what Paul is arguing is only a technicality. This is precisely why he says "sin is not counted." He doesn't make the case they didn't sin. It's just that they were not credited with their sin, in a sense.

But, even though sin was not counted, people still died in between the time of Adam and the giving of the Law of Moses. This begs the following question: If sin was not counted (which it wasn't) and the wages of sin is death (which it is) why did people die between the time of Adam and Moses?

The answer must be what we see in v. 12 when it says "all sinned." "All sinned" must refer to something other than our own individual sins. It must mean, then, that we, in some way, are held guilty for Adam's sin. In some way we are culpable for his sin. Abraham died, not for any sin he committed, but because he was a descendant of Adam and, as a result of his heritage, he bore guilt for Adam's sin.

Why else would Paul go on to make statements like the following: "Because of one man's trespass death reigned through that one man" (v. 17); "One trespass led to condemnation for all men" (v. 18); and "by one man's disobedience many were made sinners" (v.19).

Now, as to whether we are sinners because we commit sin or do we commit sin because we are sinners, Jesus answers this question when He says: "For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander. These are what defile a person." (Matthew 15). When you couple this statement with Genesis 6's statement that the intention of man's heart is only evil continually and Jeremiah's statement that the heart is desperately wicked, it is easy to see the heart is the issue and the heart is wicked which leads to sin.

So, speaking from the standpoint of Biblical Theology, we are conceived already sinners because there is never a time when we are not "in Adam," there is never a time when we don't possess an already-fallen human nature, and there is never a time when we are innocent.

The Archangel


What a novel idea. Using the Bible to say what the Bible says.

Good Job Archangel. "A workman that does not need to be ashamed"
 

Cypress

New Member
Implication 1 is not valid. If so something like this would be true as well......if it said all are liars, it would mean that all who would at some point lie are liars even if it had not yet occured A better interpretation to me is that if one is capable of understanding the text, then he is probably a sinner by that point.Meaning the author would not have felt it necessary to qualify it by saying something like all have sinned by age 12. Too big a stretch to have day old sinners.:love2:
 

Cypress

New Member
Man was also not the first or only sinner in the world. Don't get me wrong, much of what you said is true, I just think some other conclusions can be reached.:love2:
 

Luke2427

Active Member
Friends,

Thank you for your encouragement. I am very humbled by your kind words. May God be praised for His matchless word.

Blessings,

The Archangel

Add my kudos to that as well Archangel.

As usual your insight is excellent.

When I am gone from here I will give you my torch so that you can carry it along with the brighter one you already have.

Keep up the good work, Brother!
 

Dr. Bob

Administrator
Administrator
Three random thoughts:

(1) Anyone know if Noah Webster was a calvinist?

My dictionary has 15 different definitions for "all". When "all" is used, the context modifies or explains it. Even simple reading shows that "everyone without exception" is not the most common meaning of the word.

All the world went to be taxed. Not everyone without exception of course.

All Jerusalem went to be baptized by John. Not everyone without exception of course. Jesus later confronts pharisees et al and said they did NOT go.

And a hundred more.

(2) Read John 3:16 in God's Word (NOT in man-made translations). The word "whosoever" is not found. It is simply the participle "the believing ones" will not perish. Sadly, poor translations can play with our minds and cause unlearned to make up doctrines

(3) When an important truth like the universality of man's depravity and complete inability to do anything right in the sight of God is presented, God uses the word "none". As in "none" righteous. (Rom 3).

To be sure that the context helps clarify that this truly does mean every single human being, God carefully adds TWICE (to be sure slow learners and pelagians would catch it) "no, not even one!!"
 

Tom Butler

New Member
Then explain Romans 5:18

Rom 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon ALL men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon ALL men unto justification of life.

Please answer, and do not falsely accuse me of being a Universalist, I am not.

I'm assuming that, since you are not a universalist, the ALL men to whom the free gift unto justification of life was given does not mean all men without exception.

I'm assuming then, the ALL men under judgment is not the same as ALL men to whom the free gift came.

Maybe I shouldn't assume. Wanna clarify?
 

Winman

Active Member
I'm assuming that, since you are not a universalist, the ALL men to whom the free gift unto justification of life was given does not mean all men without exception.

I'm assuming then, the ALL men under judgment is not the same as ALL men to whom the free gift came.

Maybe I shouldn't assume. Wanna clarify?

I believe both instances of the word "all" in Romans 5:18 means 100% of all men, but I am not a Universalist, and I do not believe all men will be saved.

Now try to figure it out.
 

Tom Butler

New Member
I believe both instances of the word "all" in Romans 5:18 means 100% of all men, but I am not a Universalist, and I do not believe all men will be saved.

Now try to figure it out.

Forgive me, Winman, but I can't figure it out. I'm having trouble with the 100% of all men who upon whom came the gift to justification unto life. I'm not a universalist either, so it seems to me that the ALL in that sentence must be interepreted in another way than all without exception.

If Paul had written that the gift was offered to all men, then I could see how that could be 100% of all men. But it says "came upon all men."

So make it easy on me, please. Tell me what I need to know to figure it out.
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
(2) Read John 3:16 in God's Word (NOT in man-made translations). The word "whosoever" is not found. It is simply the participle "the believing ones" will not perish. Sadly, poor translations can play with our minds and cause unlearned to make up doctrines.

Man, have non-Cals gotten a lot of mileage out of the word whosoever!Yet, as you have pointed out --it's not in the original. In John 3:16 :"...the believing ones..."

(3) When an important truth like the universality of man's depravity and complete inability to do anything right in the sight of God is presented, God uses the word "none". As in "none" righteous. (Rom 3).

To be sure that the context helps clarify that this truly does mean every single human being, God carefully adds TWICE (to be sure slow learners and pelagians would catch it) "no, not even one!!"

I got a kick out of your last line:"God carefully adds TWICE (to be sure slow learners and Pelagians would catch it) 'no,not even one!!'

You sound like Gordon H.Clark there. And I mean that in a good way.
 

Jarthur001

Active Member
OK, if I understand you correctly, you are trying to find out how the "all" in Romans 3:23 means that babies are guilty of sin from conception, is that right? (For this post, I'll assume I am correct...if I'm incorrect, I'll write another post).

First off, the passages you quote are different genres. Paul is, obviously, writing in an epistolary form in which he uses "diatribe" to make his points. Paul is making arguments and answering his own proposed questions.

The Gospel of John is not epistolary; it is Gospel and as such it is much closer to strict narrative (in genre).

Second, the word "all" is always qualified by context. In the Romans passage, Paul is making the point that both Jew and Greek (or everyone without exception) is a sinner. We see this in v. 9. From v. 9, Paul moves on to buttress his argument by quoting Old Testament passage which, regardless of their original context, are used to demonstrate that "all" are sinners. By the time we get to v. 23, it is clear that Paul is making the charge that the Law applies to both Jew and Gentile and that both Jew and Gentile alike have transgressed the Law and are sinners. Or, to put it more simply, there is no distinction between Jew and Gentile--both are sinners.

In the John 3:16 passage, the word "all" is qualified and governed by the word group it is found in. In fact "whosoever" is not present and is an errant hold-over from the KJV translators who simply got this wrong (but because it is a beloved verse, most translators are reluctant to change it). The literal translation is "all the ones believing..." Because "all" appears as part of a phrase it is governed by that phrase and derives its meaning from the context, just as the "all" of Romans 3:23 means "Jew and Gentile."

So, your question seeks an answer which cannot be found in the verses you posted. However, implication can be made from these very same verses.

Implication 1: No one is righteous and all are sinners. Paul, here, makes no statement to how we become sinners. He is stating a simple fact. He is using the Aorist tense to see sin, not as individual acts, but as a summarized, completed action. Again, the individual acts here are not in view, but we can surmise that there are any number of examples of "sins" that are committed that we are guilty of.

Implication 2: Only those believing in Christ will be forgiven of their sins. John is making this point in his Gospel, especially in 3:16. The salvation is not universal; it is limited. In the text alone, only those believing in Christ will be saved.

One must read further in Paul (Romans 5) to get at the answer you are looking for. Once Romans 5 is examined, it might be said that Romans 3:23 is suggesting that we are sinners from conception.

Romans 5 clearly states that "all sinned" and as a result, death spread to all men. Now, if Paul had stopped here, I would agree that we are sinners because we sin and we are not born with sin-guilt. However, Paul doesn't stop here...he continues to explain what he means.

Sin was in the world before the Law.
Does this refer to Adam and Eve's sin? If so, does it refer only to their sin?

Sin is not counted where there is no Law. This is important. Technically, those after Adam and Eve could commit no sin because there was no Law to break. Obviously, we, from the rest of Scripture, know that incest, murder, rape, and all other forms of sin we see in Genesis are wrong. But the people in, say, the time of Abraham had no Law and were, therefore, not breaking it and, therefore, were not sinning.

From our temporal standpoint, we can say they were, in fact, sinning. God Himself would likely say they were sinning (the flood, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah, etc.). However, what Paul is arguing is only a technicality. This is precisely why he says "sin is not counted." He doesn't make the case they didn't sin. It's just that they were not credited with their sin, in a sense.

But, even though sin was not counted, people still died in between the time of Adam and the giving of the Law of Moses. This begs the following question: If sin was not counted (which it wasn't) and the wages of sin is death (which it is) why did people die between the time of Adam and Moses?

The answer must be what we see in v. 12 when it says "all sinned." "All sinned" must refer to something other than our own individual sins. It must mean, then, that we, in some way, are held guilty for Adam's sin. In some way we are culpable for his sin. Abraham died, not for any sin he committed, but because he was a descendant of Adam and, as a result of his heritage, he bore guilt for Adam's sin.

Why else would Paul go on to make statements like the following: "Because of one man's trespass death reigned through that one man" (v. 17); "One trespass led to condemnation for all men" (v. 18); and "by one man's disobedience many were made sinners" (v.19).

Now, as to whether we are sinners because we commit sin or do we commit sin because we are sinners, Jesus answers this question when He says: "For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false witness, slander. These are what defile a person." (Matthew 15). When you couple this statement with Genesis 6's statement that the intention of man's heart is only evil continually and Jeremiah's statement that the heart is desperately wicked, it is easy to see the heart is the issue and the heart is wicked which leads to sin.

So, speaking from the standpoint of Biblical Theology, we are conceived already sinners because there is never a time when we are not "in Adam," there is never a time when we don't possess an already-fallen human nature, and there is never a time when we are innocent.

The Archangel


Great job..
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
Implication 1 is not valid. If so something like this would be true as well......if it said all are liars, it would mean that all who would at some point lie are liars even if it had not yet occured A better interpretation to me is that if one is capable of understanding the text, then he is probably a sinner by that point.Meaning the author would not have felt it necessary to qualify it by saying something like all have sinned by age 12. Too big a stretch to have day old sinners.:love2:
Thank you...that is just what I was getting at.
 

Cypress

New Member
To all,
with the following quote from Archangel accepted by at least several Calvinists, do the same admit that man subsequent to Adam can be seen as not responsible for his condition? If not, why please?:love2:

"So, speaking from the standpoint of Biblical Theology, we are conceived already sinners because there is never a time when we are not "in Adam," there is never a time when we don't possess an already-fallen human nature, and there is never a time when we are innocent."

The Archangel
 

glfredrick

New Member
To all,
with the following quote from Archangel accepted by at least several Calvinists, do the same admit that man subsequent to Adam can be seen as not responsible for his condition? If not, why please?:love2:

"So, speaking from the standpoint of Biblical Theology, we are conceived already sinners because there is never a time when we are not "in Adam," there is never a time when we don't possess an already-fallen human nature, and there is never a time when we are innocent."

The Archangel

We are responsible for our condition, whether or not inherited. See Romans 1.

Here's the bottom line...

We are born dead in our sin.
We sin after we are born, whether by commission or omission, whether intentionally or accidentally, or just in passing because we are there.
We are held accountable for our sin by God.
There is no recourse for our sin -- nothing we can do to pay the penalty for it.
And, the penalty for our sin is that we are damned eternally to hell, utterly apart from God or God's grace, to suffer without ceasing.

Pretty bad news, huh?

But, the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ says that "While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us..." God made a way when no way was possible. Christ BECAME our sin. He paid the entire penalty for our sin in His own body. And in place of our sin, He imputes His righteousness to us, so that when we stand before our Father in the day of judgment, we will pass into His eternal kingdom of joy and glorification, eternally.

That is the "good news" otherwise called the gospel.

To any who think they can somehow cheat the system by doing something, I am sorry. You cannot. The Bible is clear, all our attempts at righteousness are as "filthy rags."

To any who think they can someone please God by their "faith" (before God graces them with the ability to believe), I am sorry. It is simply not so.

To any who think that God is somehow "evil" because He takes this hard line, examine your heart and realize that you still dwell in unrepentant and dead sin, for you take the point of the enemy of God and use it against our great and gracious Lord and Savior!
 

Cypress

New Member
We are responsible for our condition, whether or not inherited. See Romans 1.

Here's the bottom line...

We are born dead in our sin.
We sin after we are born, whether by commission or omission, whether intentionally or accidentally, or just in passing because we are there.
We are held accountable for our sin by God.
There is no recourse for our sin -- nothing we can do to pay the penalty for it.
And, the penalty for our sin is that we are damned eternally to hell, utterly apart from God or God's grace, to suffer without ceasing.

Pretty bad news, huh?

But, the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ says that "While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us..." God made a way when no way was possible. Christ BECAME our sin. He paid the entire penalty for our sin in His own body. And in place of our sin, He imputes His righteousness to us, so that when we stand before our Father in the day of judgment, we will pass into His eternal kingdom of joy and glorification, eternally.

That is the "good news" otherwise called the gospel.

To any who think they can somehow cheat the system by doing something, I am sorry. You cannot. The Bible is clear, all our attempts at righteousness are as "filthy rags."

To any who think they can someone please God by their "faith" (before God graces them with the ability to believe), I am sorry. It is simply not so.

To any who think that God is somehow "evil" because He takes this hard line, examine your heart and realize that you still dwell in unrepentant and dead sin, for you take the point of the enemy of God and use it against our great and gracious Lord and Savior!



Thanks for the response.......I don't deny that we all sin. Still wanting others to weigh in as to why we are responsible if born guilty somehow. I agree wholeheartedly that this is bad news.:love2:
 

glfredrick

New Member
Thanks for the response.......I don't deny that we all sin. Still wanting others to weigh in as to why we are responsible if born guilty somehow. I agree wholeheartedly that this is bad news.:love2:

The very simple answer is that God says so... Who is going to over-rule Him?
 

Cypress

New Member
The very simple answer is that God says so... Who is going to over-rule Him?

That makes zero sense to me. If you are created that way you have no chance to be otherwise and can in no way be responsible in a just way. This point is very important. I don't like analogies because of our tendency to pick them apart but will use one to illustrate. If my child is born deaf and I discipline him for not listening is that just,merciful,righteous,loving,logical,fair....etc?
Still looking for others to explain....Thanks! :love2:
 

The Archangel

Well-Known Member
That makes zero sense to me. If you are created that way you have no chance to be otherwise and can in no way be responsible in a just way. This point is very important. I don't like analogies because of our tendency to pick them apart but will use one to illustrate. If my child is born deaf and I discipline him for not listening is that just,merciful,righteous,loving,logical,fair....etc?
Still looking for others to explain....Thanks! :love2:

Part of the challenge here is that you (and others) miss one simple point: We are not directly created in God's image. Now, before people call me names and accuse me of stuff...I whole-heartedly affirm that we, even today, do bear the image of God.

However, we are not created in the image of God as Adam was. We are pro-created in the image of Adam (see Genesis 5).

So, while we bear the image of God (hence Genesis 9 demanding the death penalty for those who commit murder), we are primarily in the image of Adam (hence Paul's very common usage of "in Adam").

This is the concept in Biblical and Systematic Theology of Federal Headship. Now, there are those that want to dismiss the Federal Headship of Adam saying it is unfair that we are held guilty for Adam's sin. However, if you don't affirm that, given Paul's arguing, you cannot have us being counted righteous in Christ.

The Archangel
 

Robert Snow

New Member
I believe both instances of the word "all" in Romans 5:18 means 100% of all men, but I am not a Universalist, and I do not believe all men will be saved.

Now try to figure it out.

Let me try.

All men have the penalty of sin paid for by the death of Christ, but only those who accept Jesus Christ as Savior have the gift imputed to their account.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top