Talk of your robber barons!Probably the same guys they were paying $37/hour and laid off.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Talk of your robber barons!Probably the same guys they were paying $37/hour and laid off.
Probably the same guys they were paying $37/hour and laid off.
WOW! That will make for a happy labor force!
You all think people are happier at $13/hour?
Quality is related to quality control. The Chinese don't have any. Their labor cost is so low that Wal-Mart doesn't care if they sell junk. If 10% of the sales are returned they will still make money.
Do you have a source for your $13 per hour figure?
I have been looking and can't find anything.
Crabby's posted crazy stuff before...but this is nutso even for him. You'd figure that a leftist like him would be upset over human rights violations.
I guess forced abortions don't bother him.
I guess no religious freedom doesn't bother him.
I guess no freedom of speech doesn't bother him.
I guess the imprisonment of dissidents doesn't bother him.
Wow, Crabby. And you want people to take your views seriously?
The thread is about economic policy, not civil rights. If you want to discuss civil rights in China start another thread. I'll be happy to discuss it with you.
Please stay on topic.
If you do a bit of research you will see that China is following a very capitalistic economic policy. Their civil policy is very totalitarian. The question now facing the world is which is better capitalism under a totalitarian government or capitalism under a democratic government. I opt for the democratic government.
EVERYTHING IS about economics/money. Especially if one considers that "time is money."
On the other hand, some people will try to turn a thread about chicken soup into a rant on abortion.
China is neither free nor capitalist because many of the biggest companies are owned by the Chinese army.
Many, but not all. So capitalism lives.
Many companies in the US, while maybe not government owned in the sense you mean, are totally dependent on the government for their existence. Does that make us not capitalist. I don't think so.
And I find it humorous that you apparently have no problem with this...until this thread.
But with all its flaws (and there are plenty)--to compare the US with Red China with regards to free enterprise is stupid, to put it mildly.
#
American Thinker: American Socialism & Chinese Capitalism
7 Sep 2009 ... Why is GM, a capitalist firm, so successful in Communist China and a failure in Capitalist USA? Apparently, the Chinese learned from the ...
www.americanthinker.com/.../american_socialism_chinese_cap.html - Cached - Similar
►
#
China - The new Chinese Capitalism
The recent Olympic Games have been a great showcase for the new ascendant Chinese capitalism. China has today been through a long process of capitalist ...
www.internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1519 - Cached - Similar
#
China: Capitalism Doesn't Require Democracy
10 Jan 2006 ... You may remember when the world was divided between communism and capitalism, and when the Chinese were communists. The Chinese still call ...
www.commondreams.org/views06/0110-42.htm - Cached - Similar
#
Chinesecapitalism.com
Chinese Capitalism and the Modernist Vision provides a theoretical explanation of the current transition of the Chinese social formation, the dynamics of ...
www.chinesecapitalism.com/ - Cached - Similar
#
Chinese capitalism: industrial powerhouse or sweatshop of the world?
31 Jan 2003 ... When Beijing entered the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in December 2001, it undertook to remove most of the remaining barriers to the ...
www.wsws.org/articles/2003/jan2003/chin-j31.shtml - Cached - Similar
#
INSEAD Knowledge - The future of Chinese capitalism
29 Nov 2008 ... China's emerging economy is an enormous success story and it's remarkable, say two INSEAD professors, because it's really one big experiment ...
knowledge.insead.edu/FutureChineseCapitalism080804.cfm?... - Cached - Similar
#
Chinese Capitalism | TightWind
5 Dec 2010 ... WikiLeaks's State Department cables do provide a few more details on how China pressured Google: But Chinese officials became alarmed that ...
www.tightwind.net/2010/12/chinese-capitalism/ - Cached
#
Chinese capitalism: The long march backwards | The Economist
A surprising new book argues that China is becoming less, not more, of a capitalist economy. Chinese capitalism. Oct 2nd 2008 | from PRINT EDITION ...
www.economist.com/node/12333103?story_id=12333103 - Cached
#
Chinese Capitalism and the Myth of “Market Socialism” « Kasama
15 Aug 2009 ... As a result, Chinese internal dynamics are clearly hostile to the creation of any anti-capitalist alternative. Second, the reforms have ...
kasamaproject.org/.../chinese-capitalism-and-the-myth-of-market-socialism/ - Similar
#
The Winners And Losers In Chinese Capitalism - Gady Epstein ...
31 Aug 2010 ... The most popular recurring foreign talking point on China's surging economy in the era of the global financial crisis is something like, ...
blogs.forbes.com/.../the-winners-and-losers-in-chinese-capitalism/ - Cached
#
Books for chinese capitalism
The Future of Chinese Capitalism: Choices and ... - Gordon Redding, Michael A Witt - 2008 - 275 pages
Chinese Capitalism and the Modernist Vision - Satyananda J Gabriel - 2006 - 216 pages
Chinese Capitalism in a Global Era: Towards ... - Henry Wai Chung Yeung - 2004 - 324 pages
books.google.com
You should watch how you throw negative words around. Sometimes they come back to bite you. Informed opinion is so much more enlightening than prejudicial, uninformed opinion.
How is it that most the world knows Chinese economic policy is capitalist and you missed it?
Here, do a bit of reading:
Read it yourself. I have neither the time nor the inclination to read the ramblings of anarchist idiots. Read them yourself.
How is it that China is horribly repressive when it comes to basic human rights...and you missed it?
Could it be that you'd rather make a political point than be truthful? I would guess so.
Maybe a basic course in ethics would help you out.