IF baptists Consider Both Hyper-Cal And Hyper -Pretierism as heretical Why Posting?

[JesusFan]

IF we see both views as being outside what would be considered "normal" Christianity, why still on the BB Board?

 

[jbh28]

IF we see both views as being outside what would be considered "normal" Christianity, why still on the BB Board?

what do you mean by "why still on the BB Board"?

Do you mean why are we still here if they exist here?
Do you mean why are they here?

In other words, you didn't make a complete thought in your sentence.

 

[Allan]

IF we see both views as being outside what would be considered "normal" Christianity, why still on the BB Board?

Hmm.. could be that some of the upper management 'might' hold to some of those views. I know they forbid the Millennial Exlclusionists (ME) from posting as it as considered heretical doctrine, but why not these two (Full Pret and Hyper-Cal) are still allowed, not sure.

But my assumption is that, you begin to get into murky waters when you start declaring what is heresy and what is not. What about Hyper-Arminianism?

Many uniformed of our Reformed brethren consider Arminianism either semi or full blown Pelagainism -which are considered (even to the Arminian funny enough) heresies. So what do you start banning, and based on what criteria?

The doctrine of ME was removed because ALL groups were opposed to the teachings, and it was the one time on the BB where Arminians, non-Cals, and the Calvinists were standing together in opposition to it. Even praising each other for well thought out biblical arguments against the doctrine. But after it was banned.. it went back to the normal ad-homs, put-downs that permeate much of the threads now between the groups. But I'll tell you what, it was site to see back then

 

[JesusFan]

what do you mean by "why still on the BB Board"?

Do you mean why are we still here if they exist here?
Do you mean why are they here?

In other words, you didn't make a complete thought in your sentence.

Just was asking IF we hold that both of those held doctrines fall outside what Baptists consider to be "sound orthodoxy" why are those espousing those points still allowed to post on BB?