Alive in Christ
New Member
Apparently there is a 10 page limit, so here is VII if anyone wants to continue the discussians.
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I'm sure that's your notion, but the Scriptures testify that you could not have chosen life. Life was breathed into you, you heard the voice of your Beloved calling, and you rose and opened the door.
You made the only choice consistent with a nature born of God.
Aaron.....my complements to you brother. This is the whole argument in a nutshell & you just addressed it flawlessly! Amen to that answer.
What we have agreed upon:
1) A choice is where there are two or more options and I choose one of them.
2) You say that man has a choice between choosing to reject or believe. These are two options that are obviously not the same. so far, so good...
I ask the following because I think it is relevant, although it may sound redundant and if so, then just humor me here... Would you agree that what must be inherant in the definition above is that logically it cannot be considered an option unless there is access to that option (as indicated in the 'there are' part of the definition), therefore allowing it to be chosen, e.g. I cannot choose to be taller than I am, that option is not available to me. However, if it is accessible to me, then it can be chosen, e.g. As you have proposed, I must choose God or Self (believe or reject), both are accessible to me and therefore this is a viable logical construction of a choice. Do you agree?
One can choose to enter a door. It is a singular choice; no options.
In the case of regeneration it is God who first chose the individual by grace and faith. It is this grace that affords him to choose to enter in; a singular action.
Cheers,
Jim
One can choose to enter a door. It is a singular choice; no options.
In the case of regeneration it is God who first chose the individual by grace and faith. It is this grace that affords him to choose to enter in; a singular action.
Cheers,
Jim
Did you decide to be born?
Do flowers decide to bloom?
Does water decide to be wet?
Does fire decide to burn?
The Function & the order in life is because of "Gods Choice"
So what are you trying to say, that your different? that God can handle everything in this world BUT your salvation? Puny mortal.....try reading Job for a while
EWF, flowers, water and fire do not have real accessible options to bloom, be wet or burn. Therefore we would never to descibe them as having a choice (only when we might want to describe them in poetic or analogous fashion). I recognize that no man decides to be born.
Are you proposing that no human is ever different than flowers, water and fire in the sense that you have used above?
no options? there was the option of not entering, there could are many other accessible options and only one was chosen, which was to enter the door.
No Im telling you bluntly. You do not get a choice. Only God selects.
According to the new birth by the choice of God we must trust in Jesus. There is no other options, turn to Him and He will open our eyes.
Thank you for your reply. Are you saying that man does not have the option to trust in Jesus or not?
To trust in Jesus we do but God will hide the truth from some for the reason found in scripture
Luke 10:21 At that time Jesus, full of joy through the Holy Spirit, said, “I praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these things from the wise and learned, and revealed them to little children. Yes, Father, for this is what you were pleased to do.
So... you answered 'no', but it seems that you would agree that it is the case that "no human is ever different than flowers, water and fire" in that they do not have the capacity to choose nor do they have any real options.
In the Vol.1 thread,
Aaron said,
I believe it was EWF that said,
For me, and for the purpose of the the VOL.1 OP, it seems that the understanding of the word "choice" is the hinge that the door seems to keep swinging back and forth on. I'd like to re-post a question that to which I had not yet gotten an answer back from JBh28:
I said:
Basically, for choice to be real (and not imaginary or illogical) contrary options must be accessable. Could we just be having a friendly disagreement on what the word "choice" means?
Calvinism simply redefines the word choice to agree with their doctrine. The only one with choice in Calvinism is God who chooses to elect you or pass you by.
If God has chosen you, you will be irresistably saved, you have no choice in the matter.
If God has chosen to pass you by and leave you in a state of total inability, it is impossible for you to trust Christ. They say you have choice, but in reality you don't. But saying you have choice numbs the offended conscience and sense of justice. It is like demanding that a blind man see, and then punishing him for his inability.
A blind man cannot choose to see, but a seeing man can choose to close his eyes and be blind. And that is what some do.