• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

why MUST God Election be based Upon his predetermined Will, and Not just Foreknowledg

Skandelon

<b>Moderator</b>
skan,
what happened before israel was a nation; from adam to abraham?: your scheme does not address them?
Sure it does. Paul explain this when he writes, "God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished-- 26 he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus." (Rom 3)

And also, "18 All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: 19 that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men's sins against them. And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation. 20 We are therefore Christ's ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ's behalf: Be reconciled to God." (2 Cor 5)

As you can see from the emboldened words above, God didn't count men's sins against them and in his patience he left their sins unpunished. Thus, they were reconciled through the same means we are: faith. "Abraham believed and it was credited to him as righteousness."
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sure it does. Paul explain this when he writes, "God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished-- 26 he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus." (Rom 3)

And also, "18 All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: 19 that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men's sins against them. And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation. 20 We are therefore Christ's ambassadors, as though God were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ's behalf: Be reconciled to God." (2 Cor 5)

As you can see from the emboldened words above, God didn't count men's sins against them and in his patience he left their sins unpunished. Thus, they were reconciled through the same means we are: faith. "Abraham believed and it was credited to him as righteousness."

This does not answer the question I asked.God leaves no sin unpunished.
That is not what the passage is teaching.
 
Why is such a "big deal" if God decided to use either His direct ordaining Will to base Election on, or by His Foreknowledge of what we would choose to do?

Wouldn't both "acts" result in one becoming a Christian?

What is biig difference between these 2 views than?

Here is where "election" for us, the Gentiles comes in. The Jews of the OT were God's chosen(elected) people. But even in their "election", many died by the "way side" due to their unbelief. The atonement, when it was made, was made for ALL of Israel, and not just some. And though the atonement was for ALL of Israel, some died due to unbelief.

Now here is a passage I read the other evening, that will seal the deal, or at least it does for me.

Matt. 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?

43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

44 And whosoever shall fall on this stone shall be broken: but on whomsoever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

45 And when the chief priests and Pharisees had heard his parables, they perceived that he spake of them.

46 But when they sought to lay hands on him, they feared the multitude, because they took him for a prophet.

According to this passage, the Kingdom of God shall be taken from them. Well, if it was taken from them, then these very same Pharisees must have been included in it, until they reject Him. These very ones that Jesus told them this:

John 8:41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

So "election" for us occurred when the Jews openly rejected Jesus, and God then "chose"(elected) us, the Gentiles, corparately. Election isn't on an individual basis, but the Gentiles were "elected"(chosen) due solely to the Jews unbelief.

Acts 13:45 But when the Jews saw the multitudes, they were filled with envy, and spake against those things which were spoken by Paul, contradicting and blaspheming.

46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.

47 For so hath the Lord commanded us, saying, I have set thee to be a light of the Gentiles, that thou shouldest be for salvation unto the ends of the earth.

Acts 18:5 And when Silas and Timotheus were come from Macedonia, Paul was pressed in the spirit, and testified to the Jews that Jesus was Christ.

6 And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean; from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles.

7 And he departed thence, and entered into a certain man's house, named Justus, one that worshipped God, whose house joined hard to the synagogue.


God gave the unbelieving Jews MANY chances to believe in Jesus, and they chose not to believe. And due to their rejection of Jesus, we were "chosen"(elected) corporately, as a "Gentile nation".

i am I AM's!!

Willis
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That may be what someone who is not very knowledgable on the subject may say to explain it to a child, but its not an accurate dipection of what we believe.

We don't believe God elects certain individuals to be saved, period.

As This is the biblical teaching, you should believe it
I can not imagine that you would post this statement..but at least you are being honest about what you believe and do not believe!
We believe God elects to provide the means of salvation,

We believe God accomplishes salvation for His people
21And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

He elects and saves His people....not He elects "means"

first to the Jew and then to the Gentile (Rom. 1:18-19); he predestined, or planned before time began to bring this appeal through Israel to the rest of the world.

This is where you did not really answer my question! My question was...how did God then save persons before Israel was a nation.
Your take on this is wrong, because you are seeking to avoid the obvious teaching on individual election throughout time.





This was a mystery to the world during that time and was just being made known to them, but it was foreknown by God all along.
a wrong use of foreknown again

The parable of the wedding banquet perfectly illustrates this view of election by the way.

Ummm....no

He first sends appointed messengers to invite Israel, then he sends them to the street to invite whosoever would come.

Invite....or compel them to come?

Only those who came clothed in faith were accepted.

The wedding garment is Christs righteousness.... not human faith
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
That may be what someone who is not very knowledgable on the subject may say to explain it to a child, but its not an accurate dipection of what we believe.

We don't believe God elects certain individuals to be saved, period. We believe God elects to provide the means of salvation, first to the Jew and then to the Gentile (Rom. 1:18-19); he predestined, or planned before time began to bring this appeal through Israel to the rest of the world. This was a mystery to the world during that time and was just being made known to them, but it was foreknown by God all along.

The parable of the wedding banquet perfectly illustrates this view of election by the way. He first sends appointed messengers to invite Israel, then he sends them to the street to invite whosoever would come. Only those who came clothed in faith were accepted.

Calvinists base the election upon the decree of God exercising His Will to supply/provide the means/way that those sinners He places in Christ shall indeed be saved by placing their Faith in Jesus... taht God Himself quockens them internally, renews their minds and hearts enabling them to place faith in Christ, and ALL those he so works upon/in will receive Christ and be saved...

On what basis/grounds do Arminians rest the election of God upon?
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
Upon his divine pleasure and purpose....as explained in 2 Peter 3:9; John 3:16; 1 Tim 2:4 and elsewhere.

just curious...

Are you either a classical or Westlyn Arminian?

And what would be major difference between those 2 arm camps ?
 
Top