Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
True.Well?
Should we interprete the Bible to be saying God truely desires ALL to be saved, and that NONE should perish in their sins, or as something else?
Well?
Should we interprete the Bible to be saying God truely desires ALL to be saved, and that NONE should perish in their sins, or as something else?
True.
It is a message to reach out to the world with the Gospel because of the desire of God.
It is so easy to say the words of Paul than to live the life he lived?
They were the words of Peter....
It is true, that's how. It is true that God desires that all come to repentance leading to salvation...and it's equally true that God desires holiness and justice which mean men are accountable for their actions, which also means it is true that not all will be saved. No contradiction.How can you say "true" when he gave a choice? Didn't you notice the word "or" in his query? At least in his post --not the header.
It is true, that's how. It is true that God desires that all come to repentance leading to salvation...and it's equally true that God desires holiness and justice which mean men are accountable for their actions, which also means it is true that not all will be saved. No contradiction.
I've never denied God's permissive will...but desire and will are not one in the same.Aren't you here argiung for then a permissive/allowing dual Will for God?
he wants ALL to be saved in your words, willing NONE tp perish, yet the Will of man can and does override the expressed will of God for us?
Unless All does not mean All all of the time!
...but desire and will are not one in the same.
Salvation by Knowing the Truth
A Sermon
(No. 1516)
Delivered by
C. H. SPURGEON,
At the Metropolitan Tabernacle, Newington
"God our Savior; who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth."—1 Timothy 2:3, 4.
AY GOD THE HOLY GHOST guide our meditations to the best practical result this evening, that sinners may be saved and saints stirred up to diligence. I do not intend to treat my text controversially. It is like the stone which makes the corner of a building, and it looks towards a different side of the gospel from that which is mostly before us. Two sides of the building of truth meet here. In many a village there is a corner where the idle and the quarrelsome gather together; and theology has such corners. It would be very easy indeed to set ourselves in battle array, and during the next half-hour to carry on a very fierce attack against those who differ from us in opinion upon points which could be raised from this text. I do not see that any good would come of it, and, as we have very little time to spare, and life is short, we had better spend it upon something that may better tend to our edification. May the good Spirit preserve us from a contentious spirit, and help us really to profit by his word.
It is quite certain that when we read that God will have all men to be saved it does not mean that he wills it with the force of a decree or a divine purpose, for, if he did, then all men would be saved. He willed to make the world, and the world was made: he does not so will the salvation of all men, for we know that all men will not be saved. Terrible as the truth is, yet is it certain from holy writ that there are men who, in consequence of their sin and their rejection of the Savior, will go away into everlasting punishment, where shall be weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth. There will at the last be goats upon the left hand as well as sheep on the right, tares to be burned as well as wheat to be garnered, chaff to be blown away as well as corn to be preserved. There will be a dreadful hell as well as a glorious heaven, and there is no decree to the contrary.
What then? Shall we try to put another meaning into the text than that which it fairly bears? I trow not. You must, most of you, be acquainted with the general method in which our older Calvinistic friends deal with this text. "All men," say they,—"that is, some men": as if the Holy Ghost could not have said "some men" if he had meant some men. "All men," say they; "that is, some of all sorts of men": as if the Lord could not have said "all sorts of men" if he had meant that. The Holy Ghost by the apostle has written "all men," and unquestionably he means all men. I know how to get rid of the force of the "alls" according to that critical method which some time ago was very current, but I do not see how it can be applied here with due regard to truth. I was reading just now the exposition of a very able doctor who explains the text so as to explain it away; he applies grammatical gunpowder to it, and explodes it by way of expounding it. I thought when I read his exposition that it would have been a very capital comment upon the text if it had read, "Who will not have all men to be saved, nor come to a knowledge of the truth." Had such been the inspired language every remark of the learned doctor would have been exactly in keeping, but as it happens to say, "Who will have all men to be saved," his observations are more than a little out of place. My love of consistency with my own doctrinal views is not great enough to allow me knowingly to alter a single text of Scripture. I have great respect for orthodoxy, but my reverence for inspiration is far greater. I would sooner a hundred times over appear to be inconsistent with myself than be inconsistent with the word of God. I never thought it to be any very great crime to seem to be inconsistent with myself; for who am I that I should everlastingly be consistent? But I do think it a great crime to be so inconsistent with the word of God that I should want to lop away a bough or even a twig from so much as a single tree of the forest of Scripture. God forbid that I should cut or shape, even in the least degree, any divine expression. So runs the text, and so we must read it, "God our Savior; who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
" .... and much more following this...
Yes, God wants all to come to repentance and faith. However, His sovereign choice of some to salvation is the source of humanity's salvation and not the whims of sinful people.
False- at least concerning the verse you are referring to.
It has NOTHING whatsoever to do with the non-elect.
II Peter 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
The promise is to US- God's people. The promise to return for his own has NOTHING to do with the non-elect.
So it reads like this (the "us" is God's elect): The Lord is not slack concerning his promise to us but is longsuffering to us not willing that any of us should perish but that all of us should come to repentance.
No one who God has elected to save will FAIL to come to repentance- no one.
God is patient with us not willing that any of us should perish.
I read this verse very differently. Of course, first of all, I start my study using the NASB, which reads:
The Lord is not slow about His Promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you [those who have been saved already] not wishing for any to perish, but for all to come to repentance. God is giving us time to carry His gospel to the lost, not wishing any of the lost should perish. That is why God has not chosen to end the age in the past, and why, if we are diligent, we can hasten the day of His return. The promise in view in this passage in the day of judgment and destruction, see verse 7.
Why would Jesus weep that they would not choose Him if He didn't choose them? God would not lament over people rejecting Him if He made it that they absolutely could not accept Him.