• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Faith received part deux

Status
Not open for further replies.

preacher4truth

Active Member
Don't worry. You haven't angered me.
But you still haven't understood the meaning of the word "dead."

You can play word games all you want. If I had given an "implication" I would have used the word, but I didn't. I said what the word meant, and that is what I meant. Words have meanings, and I gave the meaning of the word. You did not accept my teaching on the word. It seems that you are unteachable.

That is not how the Bible uses the word, and thus your confusion.

I gave you the record, which you cannot argue against. Well, you can argue, but its arguing against the record.

"You shall be as gods" (when dead) i.e. capable. Uh, no. Wrong.

I don't believe him. We are incapable. I'll lean towards God when He said we would die (be incapable) than towards Satan who said we wouldn't die, but we would be gods, or (be capable.)

So, my theology is opposite of yours here, and instead of leaning towards the latter, leans toward the former.

Thats the record. And I've already given you the definition and proper implication.

I can't assist you beyond that.

One more time: When is the last time you've looked at soteriology, and which author?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
I gave you the record, which you cannot argue against. Well, you can argue, but its arguing against the record.

"You shall be as gods" (when dead) i.e. capable. Uh, no. Wrong.
That is not what the Bible says. Why are you adding to the Scriptures?
I don't believe him. We are incapable. I'll lean towards God when He said we would die (be incapable) than towards Satan who said we wouldn't die, but we would be gods, or (be capable.)
That is not what it says. And it is not what happened either. They sinned. They hid themselves. God called them. They answered. A conversation ensued between God and Adam. They were not incapable of carrying on talking with God. Thus your definition does not fit.
So, my theology is opposite of yours here, and instead of leaning towards the latter, leans toward the former.
Latter; former; it is still wrong. It goes contrary to that which is written.
Thats the record. And I've already given you the definition and proper implication.
Adam was dead. He wasn't simply a corpse. He wasn't simply incapable, for he was talking with God. Thus you still have a problem with the word "dead."
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
That is not what the Bible says. Why are you adding to the Scriptures?

That is not what it says. And it is not what happened either. They sinned. They hid themselves. God called them. They answered. A conversation ensued between God and Adam. They were not incapable of carrying on talking with God. Thus your definition does not fit.

Latter; former; it is still wrong. It goes contrary to that which is written.

Adam was dead. He wasn't simply a corpse. He wasn't simply incapable, for he was talking with God. Thus you still have a problem with the word "dead."

I waited this long for this!!? All you have is "they were not incapable of talking!" Uh. LOL!!!!!!! :laugh: :wavey:

Ya think?

Oh boy.

And nothing on your last soteriological study. Go figure.

How about a double double at Timmies, I'll buy, eh?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
I waited this long for this!!? All you have is "they were not incapable of talking!" Uh. LOL!!!!!!! :laugh: :wavey:

Ya think?

Oh boy.

And nothing on your last soteriological study. Go figure.

How about a double double at Timmies, I'll buy, eh?
They were not incapable of talking with the Lord, and yet they had sinned.
They were "dead" and yet they were not incapable of talking with the Lord.
Therefore your definition/meaning/implication of dead cannot mean "incapable" can it?
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
They were not incapable of talking with the Lord, and yet they had sinned.
They were "dead" and yet they were not incapable of talking with the Lord.
Therefore your definition/meaning/implication of dead cannot mean "incapable" can it?

Line 1 and 2 of your above post, well are, wrong, and off base. Physical talk means spiritual ability? Uh....LOL!!!! Come on DHK.

"You shall be as "capable"' (gods) i.e. Don't believe God! You're really OK!

To answer line 3? Yes, it can, and does, as I've shown you.

Your last study on soteriology? Author?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Line 1 and 2 of your above post, well are, wrong, and off base. Physical talk means spiritual ability? Uh....LOL!!!! Come on DHK.
If one is talking to God Almighty, the Creator of the Universe, The Triune Godhead, The Lord God Jehovah, and all the while knowing that he is the creature and He the Creator, how can it be anything but spiritual, even if he uses a physical voice. He is speaking to God. That means spiritual. Anything with God is spiritual. This is very basic.
Samuel talked audibly with the Lord.
Many of the prophets talked audibly with the Lord.
The fact that it is audible or silent is totally irrelevant. Do people pray aloud and use their voice in your church. If their prayer is aloud and they use their voice does that make it carnal and not spiritual? What is your point then?
"You shall be as "capable"' (gods) i.e. Don't believe God! You're really OK!
If you don't know Scripture, open up the Bible and then quote it. You are not quoting any Scripture here. I don't see it.
To answer line 3? Yes, it can, and does, as I've shown you.
1. Adam sinned.
2. In the day that Adam sinned he would die. Adam was dead.
3. After Adam died he continued to talk with God.
4. Thus "dead" does not mean incapable for Adam was capable and did carry on a conversation with God. Why do you refuse to look at the evidence set before you?

Did you look at the link where others are trying to show you the same thing?
 

Luke2427

Active Member
I do not want you to think I am singling you out, Bro. DHK, but before I could respond to you, that thread get closed. I want to carry this on a little further, okay?

You said: Your post emphasizes and strengthens my position.

I am not so sure on that Brother....lets see.

You also stated this: This is eisigesis. You have read into the passage that which is not there. What did Jesus say:
YOUR FAITH has made you whole. Jesus did not give her faith. Your preconceived theology made you think that. You had no other choice but to read that into the passage. But it is not there.


Faith is a gift of God. Any gift, when it is given, becomes yours, and therefore Jesus rightly said "your faith has made you whole". She could not see this on her own. It's like reading your bible. You can read it until you turn blue in the face, and if God doesn't enlighten you mind to understand, you can not get the meaning of His written Word. It takes God to remove the veil from your eyes to see, to unplug your ears to hear, etc. God is the author and finisher of our faith.

You also stated this: Again it says my unbelief The belief or unbelief was his. It was not Jesus' It was his faith. In verse 23 Jesus said, "all things are possible to him that believeth, not to him that believeth with God's faith." You are reading into the passage things that are not there. The faith was the father of the son. The context makes it obvious.

We all are in a state of unbelief until God shows us what we were, sinners. I did not realize the sad state I was in until God came and showed me I was a sinner in need of a Saviour. This unbelief is ours, but the belief(faith in action) comes from God.

I posted this: 6 And to knowledge temperance; and to temperance patience; and to patience godliness;

7 And to godliness brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness charity.

8 For if these things be in you, and abound, they make you that ye shall neither be barren nor unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ.


Faith gets stronger through prayer, meditation, studying, seeking His face, etc. When God showed me that I was a sinner, He gave me the faith to believe what He was saying was true, but I didn't want to be saved at that time. That faith was still there, because He called me for years, but in my rebellion, I didn't want to serve Him. When I started listening to what He was saying, and then began calling out, that faith was there, and helped me to understand what He was saying in His Word was true.[/B]

What I was trying to say here was that when God comes to us and shows us lost and doomed for hell, He gives us faith, which is a gift from Him. Now, if we push this gift aside, it will do us no good. Now, when we put this faith into action, then these other additions come along. As faith grows, we grow, as well.

I posted this: Now, here is what happens when people "squander" their gift of faith:

9 But he that lacketh these things is blind, and cannot see afar off, and hath forgotten that he was purged from his old sins.

10 Wherefore the rather, brethren, give diligence to make your calling and election sure: for if ye do these things, ye shall never fall:

So, according to what His Word has shown me, faith comes from God....or at least that is how I see it.


No, I do not believe one can lose their salvation. But when you don't put your faith into action, these other things don't come about either. Faith is the "starting point" that leads us to the throne of Grace.

Faith isn't something "conjured up" inside of man. As Brother P4T stated in a post in another thread, "Love, Grace, Mercy, Justification, Sanctification, Salvation, and Repentance" are gifts of God. Now, I kinda think that repentance is something that we must do.....but that's a whole other topic altogether.

I am sure we will remain at odds over this, but let's do this in love, okay? May God bless you with a wonderful week!!

i am I AM's!!

Willis

You have some good points here, Willis.

The idea, though, that everyone's salvation is ultimately up to them rather than God is off still.

If we love him BECAUSE he first loved us then our salvation is ultimately up to God and not us.

If God loves everybody then that verse means that EVERYBODY (in a salvific way) will love God. Why? Because we love him for this reason- he first loved us.

His loving us is what CAUSED us to love him.

If it CAUSED us to love him and if it is for everybody then why did it not CAUSE the non-elect to love him?

Saving faith is a gift from God to those who alone are the elect of God.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
You don't grasp it do you?
Corpse's don't talk. As long as you have the wrong definition of "dead" you will have a confused outlook on soteriology.

man is a tri/dual part being though...

One part of himcan indeed be dead, while rest still alive...

Again, is the Devil still physically alive, were Adam and Eve after they had died spiritually?
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
When Adam talked with God, was he a dead corpse? Yes or no?


Dead in his spirit, alive in his flesh body....

You do know that until/unlesss the Lord grants us spiritual life thru Christ again, that we are cut off from Him, that we are at war against Him, as our natural natures cannot/or want to come to God?
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
You are right. They knew something had happened, and therefore were afraid. They had sinned. Their sin had separated them from God (which is the definition of death). Death is separation. They were no longer in fellowship with God. Previously God had been walking with them in the cool of the evening. That close fellowship was no longer there. Now God was seeking them out, trying to bring them to a place of repentance and reconciliation. Finally, in Gen.3:21, we see that the Lord sacrifices an animal (not because they were cold), but because blood had to be shed to cover their sins; to bring them back into fellowship with God. Sin had separated them from God; a sacrifice (shed blood) had reconciled them.
There was spiritual death (separation); there was reconciliation (a sacrifice).

Far more than all of that happened here...

You have it that humanity got "marred/scarred" by the fall, Bible says that all of us were ruined by it, and due to that, are both depraived and unable to come back to God in ourselves and restore fellowship, as literally God has to come to us and restablish it!
 

Gershom

Active Member
Is faith something that God supernaturally injected into you? Is that the gift? Or is the gift something He provided for those who will hear His word and believe on it?
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
Is faith something that God supernaturally injected into you? Is that the gift? Or is the gift something He provided for those who will hear His word and believe on it?

While it is indeed true that "faith comes by hearing, and that by the Word of God"

before That aspect can even occur, God has to 'prepare" and enable us to be in the position where we than can hear exercise faith in jesus!
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
While it is indeed true that "faith comes by hearing, and that by the Word of God"

before That aspect can even occur, God has to 'prepare" and enable us to be in the position where we than can hear exercise faith in jesus!

JF,

It might possibly the that the reason many "non-cals" will not grant "faith" as THE gift is had nothing to do with "who" in authority man or God, but rather that God grants this same measure of "potential" faith to all men.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
Is faith something that God supernaturally injected into you? Is that the gift? Or is the gift something He provided for those who will hear His word and believe on it?

Good points.

What do youu mean by "supernaturally injected?" Not picking, but that almost comes across sarcastically, and perhaps, that is your intent, if I am wrong, I apologize.

But, doesn't God place the Holy Spirit within us? Are you, when saying "inject" alluding to this gift of the Spirit as an example, and to Him being placed inside us, as the methodology? I ask sincerely.

Another way I see your wording is that you may be perhaps implying God forcing Himself on a believer, in opposition to we arguing that He gave us the gift of faith to believe. If I am wrong about that, then my apologies. This is though what it looks like to me. Also, if this is the case, that you are arguing for, I don't believe any of us felt forced, but most certainly overwhelmed and compelled, and enabled to believe.

Now, what have we received, that we were not given? If faith were inherent, then was this also not a gift? (I don't believe it was inherent, I believe it was given during the process of instantaneous salvation, following prevenient Grace.)

2 Peter 1:1 and other passages show faith as a gift, and the context, as in other epistles, that begin with praise for salvation, follows this same context here, that it was a gift resulting in salvation.
 

JesusFan

Well-Known Member
Good points.

What do youu mean by "supernaturally injected?" Not picking, but that almost comes across sarcastically, and perhaps, that is your intent, if I am wrong, I apologize.

But, doesn't God place the Holy Spirit within us? Are you, when saying "inject" alluding to this gift of the Spirit as an example, and to Him being placed inside us, as the methodology? I ask sincerely.

Another way I see your wording is that you may be perhaps implying God forcing Himself on a believer, in opposition to we arguing that He gave us the gift of faith to believe. If I am wrong about that, then my apologies. This is though what it looks like to me. Also, if this is the case, that you are arguing for, I don't believe any of us felt forced, but most certainly overwhelmed and compelled, and enabled to believe.

Now, what have we received, that we were not given? If faith were inherent, then was this also not a gift? (I don't believe it was inherent, I believe it was given during the process of instantaneous salvation, following prevenient Grace.)

2 Peter 1:1 and other passages show faith as a gift, and the context, as in other epistles, that begin with praise for salvation, follows this same context here, that it was a gift resulting in salvation.

Could be understand Gershom wrong in this, THINK that he is saying God grants unto us the 'gift of faith" whe nwe meet the requirment for it by placing faith in jesus Christ...
 

Gershom

Active Member
Good points.

What do youu mean by "supernaturally injected?" Not picking, but that almost comes across sarcastically, and perhaps, that is your intent, if I am wrong, I apologize.

But, doesn't God place the Holy Spirit within us? Are you, when saying "inject" alluding to this gift of the Spirit as an example, and to Him being placed inside us, as the methodology? I ask sincerely.

Another way I see your wording is that you may be perhaps implying God forcing Himself on a believer, in opposition to we arguing that He gave us the gift of faith to believe. If I am wrong about that, then my apologies. This is though what it looks like to me. Also, if this is the case, that you are arguing for, I don't believe any of us felt forced, but most certainly overwhelmed and compelled, and enabled to believe.

Now, what have we received, that we were not given? If faith were inherent, then was this also not a gift? (I don't believe it was inherent, I believe it was given during the process of instantaneous salvation, following prevenient Grace.)

2 Peter 1:1 and other passages show faith as a gift, and the context, as in other epistles, that begin with praise for salvation, follows this same context here, that it was a gift resulting in salvation.

No I wasn't being sarcastic, but well-meaning. I understand your point concerning the Holy Spirit which is most certainly a gift. What I meant by the question of injecting faith (as a gift) in a similar way, is that, does God somehow take this faith and place in a person without the means of the Word?

edited to add: "(as a gift) in a similar way"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

preacher4truth

Active Member
No I wasn't being sarcastic, but well-meaning. I understand your point concerning the Holy Spirit which is most certainly a gift. What I meant by the question of injecting faith is similar in a way, is that, does God somehow take this faith and place in a person without the means of the Word?

Oh, well my apologies if I've offended.

But we both know the passage for this:

"So faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the Word of Christ." Romans 10:17

So the faith came externally, not from within, for it came by the Word of Christ, in the same way, that by the Word of Christ, all life comes, as seen through the Creation, and by Him raising Lazarus, and throughout the Scriptures this is explicitly taught. This is in one way I see it coming as an external gift.
 

Winman

Active Member
You have some good points here, Willis.

The idea, though, that everyone's salvation is ultimately up to them rather than God is off still.

If we love him BECAUSE he first loved us then our salvation is ultimately up to God and not us.

If God loves everybody then that verse means that EVERYBODY (in a salvific way) will love God. Why? Because we love him for this reason- he first loved us.

His loving us is what CAUSED us to love him.

If it CAUSED us to love him and if it is for everybody then why did it not CAUSE the non-elect to love him?

Saving faith is a gift from God to those who alone are the elect of God.

The scriptures say Jesus loved the young rich ruler, but he failed to trust Christ and went away unsaved, so the scriptures do not teach that God loving us CAUSES us to love him back. You err.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top