Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
What would Adam and Eves children been like if they (Adam and Eve) had not sinned?
Would they be born innocent......if so, until when?:love2:
Many on the forum use a baby's selfishness or his struggling with a sibling, or resisting a parents wishes as some kind of proof of original sin . If this were so, these actions would not be expected to be present in the sinless Adams offspring, or would they. If they performed as all children do, would it not be considered sin since they had no knowledge of good and evil independent of God.
While this is by no means an original question, it had never crossed my mind until deep into the thread on origin of the doctrine of original sin.
A moot question. The fall happened before they had children.What would Adam and Eves children been like if they (Adam and Eve) had not sinned?
Would they be born innocent......if so, until when?:love2:
A moot question. The fall happened before they had children.
Just what I was thinking. We don't know how children born into a sinless world would behave like since all children were born after the fall.
Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that is was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
This verse reveals Eve's nature before the fall. Did she have fleshly desires? YES. She desired the fruit because it looked good for food, it would satisfy her hunger. It was pleasant to the eyes, she had the same lust of the eyes that we do when a man looks at pornography. It appealed to her pride, she desired it because it would make her wise.
Now, how would you describe these desires Eve had BEFORE she actually took the fruit and ate it? Aren't these desires exactly what we call the sin nature?
So, Adam and Eve were no different than us, they had the same fleshly desires and temptations we have. If a person is honest, they have to conclude Adam and Eve had a sin nature BEFORE the fall. And their children would have had the same fleshly desires.
The difference is that after they ate the tree of knowledge of good and evil they acquired knowledge. They realized and were made aware they had sinned and therefore were convicted of sin and spiritually died. This is
why God told them "for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." (Gen 2:17)
Adam and Eve had what many call a "sin nature" BEFORE the fall. They clearly had fleshly lusts and desires as revealed by scripture.
And yet, God said they were VERY GOOD. (Gen 1:31)
It is indeed a moot question, but we know the correct answer nevertheless. The children would have the same fleshly lusts and desires that Adam and Eve had BEFORE the fall.
Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that is was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.
This verse reveals Eve's nature before the fall. Did she have fleshly desires? YES. She desired the fruit because it looked good for food, it would satisfy her hunger. It was pleasant to the eyes, she had the same lust of the eyes that we do when a man looks at pornography. It appealed to her pride, she desired it because it would make her wise.
Now, how would you describe these desires Eve had BEFORE she actually took the fruit and ate it? Aren't these desires exactly what we call the sin nature?
So, Adam and Eve were no different than us, they had the same fleshly desires and temptations we have. If a person is honest, they have to conclude Adam and Eve had a sin nature BEFORE the fall. And their children would have had the same fleshly desires.
The difference is that after they ate the tree of knowledge of good and evil they acquired knowledge. They realized and were made aware they had sinned and therefore were convicted of sin and spiritually died. This is
why God told them "for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." (Gen 2:17)
Adam and Eve had what many call a "sin nature" BEFORE the fall. They clearly had fleshly lusts and desires as revealed by scripture.
And yet, God said they were VERY GOOD. (Gen 1:31)
I agree with you Winman......my wild speculations on a moot point are meant to bring us to consider just this point. None of us can picture infants/children behaving any differently than they do. Although, having raised two, I have wished they would have a time or two.
Romans 5: 12-14 shows clearly that death, the penalty of sin, is visited upon those who have never exercised a personal or conscious choice. Sin exists in the case of infants prior to moral consciousness, and therefore in the nature, as distinguished from the personal activity. It is therefore certan, by many scriptures, that a sinful, guilty and condemnable nature belongs to ALL mankind.
Cheers,
Jim
The scriptures do not say we are born dead.
Ecc 7:29 Lo, this only have I found, that God hath made man upright; but they have sought out many inventions.
The scriptures say man is made upright, not dead. And the word "they" is plural, showing this is speaking of all men.
Psa 139:13 Thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother's womb.
14 I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.
David said he was covered by God in his mother's womb, he said he was fearfully and wonderfully made, and calls this work marvellous.
Hardly the words to describe a filthy little sinner. How is being made a filthy sinner wonderful? How is being made a filthy sinner marvellous?
Please explain David's words;
KJV; Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.
NIV; Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.
I am sorry to learn that you prefer non-Christian commentators to Christian ones. For myself, I would sooner trust the word of God which the Jews rejected, namely the New Testament and Romans 5 in particular.I will explain it like the Jewish theologians explained it for 1500 years before Augustine (and still hold), that David was saying he was born into a sinful world. The Jews have never believed men are born with a sin nature, or that Adam's sin was transmitted to his children.
This idea has popped up at times, and this is directly addressed in Ezekiel 18. The Jews had an erroneous proverb that said, "The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge?" (Eze 18:2)
God refutes this and repeatedly says the sons shall not bear the iniquity of their father and vice versa.You are teaching exactly what God refutes in Eze 18:20. If God caused Adam's sin to pass on us, he would directly be contradicting his own words.
This is pure supposition. Do you suppose that we won't eat in heaven (Isaiah 25:6-8; Rev 19:9)?Winman said:Adam and Eve always had mortal bodies, else they would not need to eat.
I will explain it like the Jewish theologians explained it for 1500 years before Augustine (and still hold), that David was saying he was born into a sinful world. The Jews have never believed men are born with a sin nature, or that Adam's sin was transmitted to his children.
This idea has popped up at times, and this is directly addressed in Ezekiel 18. The Jews had an erroneous proverb that said, "The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge?" (Eze 18:2)
God refutes this and repeatedly says the sons shall not bear the iniquity of their father and vice versa.
You are teaching exactly what God refutes in Eze 18:20. If God caused Adam's sin to pass on us, he would directly be contradicting his own words.