Do you know what the immediate and overall context of Biblical scripture is? That is all the context one needs to understand the words used in scripture. {/quote] That includes literary and historical context which you have failed to provide.
[quote}The Hebrew and Greek languages are living languages today and their is abundant of lexigraphical materials available to note the changes in meanings of different terms at different points in time. There are multitude of lexicons.
Studying modern English does not equate to studying English in 1611. You have failed miserably to understand the difference between modern Hebrew and Greek and the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek of the day. So what you suggest completely disregards the study of historical context and how those words were actually used then.
The Holy Spirit's use of Biblical terms is often different than their contemporary literary use! It is often different then their cultural and historical use. Regardless if one knows anything about the contemporary literary or cutural meaning of a term, they need only know how it is used in the Biblical context - period!
Holy Spirit Greek never existed. Most of the time those words were used in secular society and not limited to usage in scripture only. If you had studied Greek usage in other documents of the day you would know that what you suggest has little truth. The same exists even today. Just recently on TV was a program talking about a document written last century at this time to interpret it correctly. They went back and took a look at other documents to see how particular words were used at that time.
Consider why in the same denomination the words "Lord's Supper" and "Communion" are used to mean the same thing in several of their churches. Why?
Your very question is a presumption that you have correctly interpreted the Greek term "eis" correctly! I have shown an interpretation that fits the context perfectly. Why should I presume your interpretation of the Greek preposition is correct??? That is the necessary presumption to even entertain your theory![/QUOTE]Eis has absolutely nothing to with the interpretation of that passage. One must go back to history at the time to properly understand that verse.
You might try the verse Acts 2:38 if you believe that historical context means nothing.