freeatlast
New Member
Would you agree that Jesus is the only man to have experienced the following?
(1) And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. John 1:14, Matt. 1:25, 1 John 4:2,3 Rom. 1:3 Gal. 3:16
(2) the last Adam (man) a quickening spirit.
Col. 1:18, Acts 13:33 Acts 2:33 Titus 3:5
I have no clue what you are asking in regards to those verses so I canot give you an answer.
Howbeit that not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
After the resurrection.
Would you also agree that Jesus the Christ is the only man only to have had the natural (flesh nature) and then the spirit (spiritual)?
Could these be construed as two natures? One pre resurrection and the other post resurrection?
As to this question I suppose some could say the right foot is one nature and the left the other, and hold what we have two natures if they wanted. However if you are tring to suggest we have two natures that would be incorrect.
(1) And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. John 1:14, Matt. 1:25, 1 John 4:2,3 Rom. 1:3 Gal. 3:16
(2) the last Adam (man) a quickening spirit.
Col. 1:18, Acts 13:33 Acts 2:33 Titus 3:5
I have no clue what you are asking in regards to those verses so I canot give you an answer.
Howbeit that not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.
After the resurrection.
Would you also agree that Jesus the Christ is the only man only to have had the natural (flesh nature) and then the spirit (spiritual)?
Could these be construed as two natures? One pre resurrection and the other post resurrection?
As to this question I suppose some could say the right foot is one nature and the left the other, and hold what we have two natures if they wanted. However if you are tring to suggest we have two natures that would be incorrect.