Robert Snow
New Member
The fact that we are even talking about this book proves it serves its purpose, making money off the gullible.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
In a case like this I am happy to be ignorant of her and her account and can say that I can happily reject her story without knowing anything else about it. I spent some time in the charismatic movement right after I got saved, and I now have a closed mind about such claims. I don't believe what I hear about her claim and am not interested in hearing her defend her story.
I would tend to say the same thing about DON Piper's 90 Minutes in heaven? Any takers?
Agreed. I can't see ANY reformed Christian being deceived into believing this.
I would say that NO conservative Christian, regardless of salvation model adopted, would see this as error!
What does being reformed have to do with believing or not believing this story?I'd be shocked if any were reformed who believe it. There may be some that say they "used to be Calvinist" but they are of the cloth of many who claim that as a past theology, who were never truly reformed, nor do they understand it, yet act as if they do.![]()
What does being reformed have to do with believing or not believing this story?
I don't know to be honest.
Some of the Baptists who are non-cal I know are like this:
Those who are non-cal/anti-cal tend to in some cases believe sensationalist views such as Riplinger, Ruckman, Hyles-esque theology, KJVOnlyisms, 1611 tales, and believe tales such as the story in the OP. I have also noted that defenders of such views are quick to believe scams such as the "Proctor & Gamble" is of the devil, and are quick to believe persons who are in on MV's are "of the devil" and are "involved in the occult."
I have not witnessed one DoG type of believer who believes any of this.
So I wonder why this is myself.
I don't know to be honest.
Some of the Baptists who are non-cal I know are like this:
Those who are non-cal/anti-cal tend to in some cases believe sensationalist views such as Riplinger, Ruckman, Hyles-esque theology, KJVOnlyisms, 1611 tales, and believe tales such as the story in the OP. I have also noted that defenders of such views are quick to believe scams such as the "Proctor & Gamble" is of the devil, and are quick to believe persons who are in on MV's are "of the devil" and are "involved in the occult."
I have not witnessed one DoG type of believer who believes any of this.
So I wonder why this is myself.
Maybe you just hang out with crazy people? :laugh:
:thumbsup:
We're having jackalope stew, but we'll freeze the possum fer later!
Looking at what some on the BB endorse and believe in, I was wondering who here believes the testimony of Mary K. Baxter.
Mary K. Baxter says she was praying and had a divine revelation and went to hell with Jesus and was told to write a book about this to save souls.
Here is a link about her journey:
http://www.spiritlessons.com/Mary_K_Baxter_A_Divine_Revelation_of_Hell.htm
Do you believe in this?
Would such a story be easier believed by those who hold to a non-cal theology, or those who are Reformed/DoG/Calvinistic?
If you believe it, or do not believe it, please state your theological stance as one of the above. Thanks.
I lived in Maine for several years where they had "no-name" road-kill stew.
"Ain't shoowah what it is but the price was right".
HankD
[SIZE=+0]The bible says the following. Romans 10:18 So then faith [cometh] by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.
What we have to decide is whether or not what this woman is saying is the word of God or not. If it is then it needs to be added to the bible. If not then it is just another message from another person that claims to have been given a revelation.
Clearly her doctrinal beliefs are not the same as mine as she seems to suggest that we are kept saved by works. For me that alone would be enough to hold that her claimed revelation is false. I am not suggesting she is lying or not lying. I am simply saying I do not believer her claimed experience was of the Lord.
The bible says this. John 16:29-31
Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.
And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.
And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
Finally based on those verses I would say her claimed revelation was not of the Lord. If we will not hear Moses and the Prophets then this new revelation will be of no use. I would brand her a false prophet.
[/SIZE]