There is no problem with aligning 1 Corinthians 15:23 and 24 with the pre-trib rapture or the millennial reign.
The NIV puts a comma in between that others may or may not have:
"But each in his own turn: Christ, the firstfruits; then, when he comes, those who belong to him."
I personally view it as Christ is the first and also owner of the first fruits and as such has all believers.
So, the resurrection of Christ as the first fruit, and Christ, the first fruits can be viewed as both being equally valid.
Then, "when He comes, those who belong to him" would be the tribulation saints that did not get to participate in the first fruits.
Now, 2 Corinthians 15:24 but within the following verses, too:
"Then the end will come, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father after he has destroyed all dominion, authority and power. 25For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. 26The last enemy to be destroyed is death. 27For he “has put everything under his feet.”c Now when it says that “everything” has been put under him, it is clear that this does not include God himself, who put everything under Christ. 28When he has done this, then the Son himself will be made subject to him who put everything under him, so that God may be all in all. "
is also not a problem in the pre-trib millennial view.
The 24th verse standing alone might support an non-millennial view, however the following verses show the millennial view indeed is appropriate. For every day we do NOT see the enemies put under his feet, and that ONLY during the millennial view when Christ's rules as King of Kings with a rod of iron do we see both the world at total peace and the wicked "under his feet." Note in verse 26 the last enemy. Death and hell are cast into the lake of fire when time is over and the heavens and earth are gone in a fervent heat.
What is remarkable is both the exaltation of Christ in this passage, and the subjection of Christ to God that God alone is supreme (verse 28).
The millennial view with a nod to the pre-trib rapture seems to hold the greatest number of verses as non-allegorical and because it does, should be considered more in line with the truth. That does not dispute that allegory is a part of prophecy, just as parables are part of teaching the truth.
Just as parables must have other Scriptures to validate the truth, the prophecies do not stand alone. And when the greatest number point to a non-allegorical view then it should be taken as valid, leaving the rest to allegorical visions attempting to express what was beyond the writer's perceptive living.
However you asked for a specific verse from the Revelation to align with 2 Corinthians. I suggest the following:
"After this I looked, and there before me was a door standing open in heaven. And the voice I had first heard speaking to me like a trumpet said, "Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after this."
