• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

What does ETERNAL mean?

Michael Wrenn

New Member
How about the Masters own words? Then he will say to those on his left, 'Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.'" Matthew 25:41

He didn't say "eternal"; that's an incorrect rendering of the word. The correct rendering would be "fire of the ages" or "eons".
 

Michael Wrenn

New Member
We no longer have to do the works of the law, i.e. circumcision, sin offerings, etc., (see Colossians 2:14) that does NOT mean we do not have to do right and good deeds.

What good is it if someone claims to have faith but has no good deeds? Can such faith save them? Faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.

You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that.

You foolish person, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless? Abraham was considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar. You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did.

The scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called God’s friend.

You see that a person is considered righteous by what they do and not by faith alone.

Do you agree with what I posted? No, then you do NOT believe the Word of God, because I took this from the Bible. See James 2:14-22.

Protestants have a problem with James. They wish it wasn't a part of scripture, but since it is, they either deny it's plain words or try to explain and rationalize it away.

I'm not Catholic, but I what I've said is the truth.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Do not use scripture to try to disprove scripture that is how Satan uses scripture. Check out the temptation of Jesus.
I was quoting Scripture like you were quoting Scripture--without context; as you did with James 2. If you say that is the way that Satan uses Scripture then apply it to yourself. I was using Scripture as you use Scripture--same methodology.
 

Michael Wrenn

New Member
No it is not. We are not speaking of English. We are speaking Greek. Eon is a noun and the word in the verses mentioned are adjectives. They are different words.

I know that; I'm just saying that is the English rendering of the word. It doesn't matter whether the words are adjective or nouns; that has absolutely nothing to do with it. Whether adjective or noun, the Greek original does not mean "eternal". That is a false and incorrect rendering of the meaning of the word in the original. Anyone interpreting it as "eternal" is forcing a meaning onto the original which it did not have.
 

Moriah

New Member
I was quoting Scripture like you were quoting Scripture--without context; as you did with James 2. If you say that is the way that Satan uses Scripture then apply it to yourself. I was using Scripture as you use Scripture--same methodology.

What you say is not true. Anyone can read your ridiculous example of using scripture to go against a whole passage that I gave.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Protestants have a problem with James. They wish it wasn't a part of scripture, but since it is, they either deny it's plain words or try to explain and rationalize it away.

I'm not Catholic, but I what I've said is the truth.

I LOVE James - I read it every year in my devotions.
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I know that; I'm just saying that is the English rendering of the word. It doesn't matter whether the words are adjective or nouns; that has absolutely nothing to do with it. Whether adjective or noun, the Greek original does not mean "eternal". That is a false and incorrect rendering of the meaning of the word in the original. Anyone interpreting it as "eternal" is forcing a meaning onto the original which it did not have.

What? We are speaking about the original meaning of the word. How can you say that it does not mean what it means? The original meaning of the word means something that never ceases - something that will never end. That is the actual meaning of the word - it is not forcing anything.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
What you say is not true. Anyone can read your ridiculous example of using scripture to go against a whole passage that I gave.
I gave you my example from Psalm 14:1. Here is yours. It is the same thing.
You foolish person, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless? Abraham was considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar. You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did.
...
Do you agree with what I posted? No, then you do NOT believe the Word of God, because I took this from the Bible. See James 2:14-22.
You ripped that Scripture right out of its context. Abraham was not considered righteous for what he did. And that is not what James was teaching. What you are teaching is a deceitful use of Scripture--just like Psalms teaches "there is no God," you are doing the same thing.
 

Moriah

New Member
Protestants have a problem with James. They wish it wasn't a part of scripture, but since it is, they either deny it's plain words or try to explain and rationalize it away.

I'm not Catholic, but I what I've said is the truth.


The Calvinists and Lutherans do not understand that there is the Law in the Old Testament the Law that consists of sins not to do and of good to do and then there is the works of the law both together called The Law.

The works of the law is a written code with regulations, for worship, and an earthly sanctuary. Gifts and sacrifices were required for worship and the earthly sanctuary. They are only a matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washing---external regulations.
God forgave us all our sins, having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross.

We are no longer saved by those kinds of works, but we still have to have Jesus’ teachings and obey them. Jesus’ teachings are not works of the law. Calvinists and Lutherans think that doing anything is called a work,and thus they teach for Christians we do not have to do anything to be saved. What a confusing mess they teach.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Michael Wrenn

New Member
What? We are speaking about the original meaning of the word. How can you say that it does not mean what it means? The original meaning of the word means something that never ceases - something that will never end. That is the actual meaning of the word - it is not forcing anything.

That is not what it means.

In classical and in secular Greek, aionios is an adjective formed from the noun aion. In classical Greek this word aion has three main meanings.

(i) It means a life-time.

(ii) Then it comes to mean an age, a generation, or an epoch. So the Greeks could speak of this present aion, and of the aion which is to come, this present age and the age which is to come.

(iii) But then the word comes to mean a very long space of time.

"Aion" is the English word "eon". It does not mean "eternal".
 

Moriah

New Member
I gave you my example from Psalm 14:1. Here is yours. It is the same thing.

You ripped that Scripture right out of its context. Abraham was not considered righteous for what he did. And that is not what James was teaching. What you are teaching is a deceitful use of Scripture--just like Psalms teaches "there is no God," you are doing the same thing.

No, I did not rip anything out of the scriptures, you did. You quoted one little sentence. Any fool can see that the Bible is not saying there is no God, in fact, THAT IS WHAT THAT SCRIPTURE IS ABOUT, SOMETHING A FOOL SAYS.
You say James was not teaching what I said he was. ALL I DID WAS QUOTE JAMES! Now, since you say Abraham was NOT considered righteous for what he did, tell me, if Abraham had refused to take Isaac to be offered, what do YOU THINK WOULD BE THE MESSAGE IN THAT? You are someone who goes terribly against God’s Word.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
We are no longer saved by those kinds of works, but we still have to have Jesus’ teachings and obey them. Jesus’ teachings are not works of the law. Calvinists and Lutherans think that doing anything is called a work,and thus they teach for Christians we do not have to do anything to be saved. What a confusing mess they teach.
Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Who is confused?
 

Michael Wrenn

New Member
The Calvinists and Lutherans do not understand that there is the Law in the Old Testament the Law that consists of sins not to do and of good to do and then there is the works of the law both together called The Law.

The works of the law is a written code with regulations, for worship, and an earthly sanctuary. Gifts and sacrifices were required for worship and the earthly sanctuary. They are only a matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washing---external regulations.
God forgave us all our sins, having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross.

We are no longer saved by those kinds of works, but we still have to have Jesus’ teachings and obey them. Jesus’ teachings are not works of the law. Calvinists and Lutherans think that doing anything is called a work,and thus they teach for Christians we do not have to do anything to be saved. What a confusing mess they teach.

Yes, indeed.

Since the scriptures teach that works are an evidence that a person has come to faith, and James teaches that we are not saved by faith alone, how do you suppose faith alone advocates would view a person who claimed to have faith but never exhibited any good works?

I ask this, being basically a faith alone advocate. :) Meaning, that I don't see that the thief on the cross did any good works and yet was saved. But of course he didn't really have time or opportunity to put his faith into action.
 
Top