Heavenly Pilgrim
New Member
Biblicist: Hebrews 9:27 says it is an "appointment" and the only ones that will not meet that appointment as far as Biblical revelation is concerned are those living when Christ comes again, those which will be transformed, and then there is the exceptions to the rule - Elijah and Enoch.
HP: I have never stated that death is not an appointment. I only have said it is NOT the penalty of sin. It is a consequence of sin, just as physical depravity is a consequence of sin and yet is not the penalty of sin. Innocent babies are subject to physical depravity, but they are not being punished for their sin or the sin of any other. The 'penalty for' and 'consequences of' sin are not one in the same. God punishes sin. God does not punish infants nor anyone else for the sins of another according to Scripture.
Eze 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him
I am NOT building anything upon silence. I am showing you by clear example those that have not and will not see death according to the Word of God, That is not silence Biblicist.
HP: Let's all and listen to Biblicist expound on 'why' Christ 'had'' to die physically. As far as I can recall, the only 'reason why' might be said to be, in order to fulfill prophesy, but in reality one can still wonder why. When Biblicst tells us the mind of God as he thinks he knows, ask yourself; could God have done it some other way if He so chose in His wisdom to do so? If not why not?Biblicist: 1. If sin does not require death as a penalty then why did Christ have to die physically at all or "die for our sins"?????
Biblicist: 2. If Christ died for our sins and thus all penalties of sin have been IMMEDIATELY removed then why are we not instantly glorified from all "consequences" of sin (pain, suffering, killing, decay, sickness, etc.)
HP: We are speaking concerning something that has to be set aside 'in order to' receive salvation period, not something that is a benefit of having been saved that we will receive later. If the penalty of sin has not been paid for in some sense by Christ, no salvation is even possible. Glorification is out of the question entirely until the ransom has been made. Whatever is paid for we will not have to suffer. If we have to suffer still, it could not have been paid for literally. Once the penalty of sin is set aside, we no longer subject to its penalty. We may certainly suffer some of the consequences of sin, but never will we suffer the penalty of sin unless we abort our faith via continued disobedience.
The very fact that there have been and will be some that do not see physical death is living proof it is not the penalty of sin. The penalty for sin is unavoidable until it is completely set aside, and that universally so without exception. Physical death is NOT that way, and can and has been set aside, and has been and will be on certain occasions. Penalties for sin remain the same without variance apart from salvation, while consequences for sin often do vary from person to person. God never will alter the penalty of sin, but consequences for sin are not always incurred in the same manner person to person, even among the righteous.
Concluding Principles: The penalty of sin will never be altered for anyone. It is a universal eternal penalty meted out with exacting justice by God apart from salvation without exception. A consequences of sin, such as physical death, is not a universal penalty for sin AS CLEARLY SEEN BY SCRIPTURAL EXAMPLE, and is not, neither must it be, inflicted universally upon all without exception. There is a clear distinction that needs to be understood between the penalty for sin and consequences of sin.
Last edited by a moderator: