1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Pardon by Grace or by Works?

Discussion in 'Other Christian Denominations' started by Heavenly Pilgrim, Apr 13, 2012.

  1. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137

    The cults pit Scripture against Scripture and ignore the context when they do so causing "apparent" contradictions when in reality there are none.

    What does the Bible say about Abraham?
    Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.
    --Abraham was saved by faith alone. This is what the Scriptures clearly teach. Now you can go ahead and take the Scriptures from James out of their context, thereby foolishly making the Bible look as if it contradicts itself, or you can find out the context that those verses are written in, and see how they harmonize with what Paul wrote--your choice.
     
  2. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0

    HP: As I have said before, you have no right to say when and where God justifies. He can justify at baptism as well as he can justify before baptism. Who are we to say when God justifies? If one says one has to be baptised to be saved, I would say I certainly, but which baptism (out of the seven or so as I recall) saves? I would say that the baptism into Christ saves, and that can be accomplished with or without a drop of water.

    So we see, we are getting of the topic of the OP by the notion of baptism, so I will quit here.

    HP: Where do you get off telling God when he justifies anyone but possibly yourself? You have no right to say that the sacrifices made in the OT were simply outward signs of something that had already happened. God said if you desire to be right with me, do this. I for one would be doing it.


    HP: Obviously you do not believe the Scriptures you are quoting, you are simply putting your own twist on them to line up with your own theology. If God tells you to do something "for thy cleansing", there is no evidence you will be cleansed until you do it. If God tells you to repent or be lost, you are lost until you fulfill the command or at least until you form an honest intention of obedience to the command.



    HP: Jesus can heal whenever he chooses to, but you will never be saved apart from repenting first. Everyone healed was not saved as far as I read Scripture. It is mute on that point. Healing and getting right with God can be two distinct matters.



    HP: I do not believe in baptismal regeneration, but I do not deny that God cannot at times save at baptism. He can save pre, post, or during baptism. Again, this thread was not meant to discuss any NT ordinance, but rather was designed to look at the OT system specifically.
     
  3. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481


    He did exactly what you and Moriah and others are doing! He offered up the fruits of HIS OWN WORKS on the very same altar that Abel offered up the slain lamb (Jn. 1:29)! Abel offered up the life of a slain substitute while Cain offered up FRUITS of his own labors. What God rejected was WORKS of his own hands as a suitable offering. Only the shedding of blood of a SUBSTITUTIONARY LIFE is acceptable with God. You are following in the way of Cain.


    Why don't you accept the Biblical explanation in Hebrews 11:4? I will tell you why because you reject it.

    heb. 11:4 ¶ By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.

    1. Faith was required prior to offering it up because he offered it up "by faith." Thus faith preceded the good work.

    2. The offering did not obtain regeneration/salvation/justification but obtained the "WITNESS THAT HE WAS" already righteous by faith.

    3. Hence, he did not offer up the sacrifice in order to become a child of God, to become justified, to become regenerated but as a WITNESS that he already "was" all that by faith.





    Because you have jerked the text out of its context, applied it wrongly and then set up a yes or no answer to a false premise. I placed the text back in its context proving that salvation is purchased without money or price but by the sure mercies of David which are based solely upon the blood purchase found in the everlasting covenant in the Person and redemptive work of Jesus Christ.

    Repentance and faith have their source in the regenerative power of God and not in man (Rom. 7:18b; 8:7-8; Jn. 6:44; 64-65; Acts 11:17; Philip. 2:13; Heb. 12:2, etc.)



    it is self-evident that you have yet to obey God in "repentance FROM DEAD WORKS" and you never will unless God has mercy upon you and EMPOWERS you to do so. I say it is self-evident because you are still believing in and teaching the doctrine of "dead works" for salvation.
     
    #43 The Biblicist, Apr 14, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 14, 2012
  4. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: I am not pitting Scripture against Scripture, I have tried my dead level best to show you how to harmonize them but to no avail.




    HP: I missed that verse. Where did it say anything about faith alone? Faith and works are inseparably tied as I have shown by James when it comes to the conditions God has mandated for salvation. Deny the conditions and you CANNOT escape a necessitate fatalistic doctrine.

    When one mentions faith, it is not necessary every time to explain that faith without works is dead. If God accepts it, it involves acts of the will in obedience to His stated conditions, even though only one thing such as 'faith' is mentioned. Our 'faith' involves obedience, or again it is dead.



    HP: My choice is to take them in context and believe them for precisely what they say 'in context.' ; " Faith without works is dead being alone."

    You would do well to believe the Scriptures in context as well. :thumbs:
     
  5. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0


    HP: What an absolutely unsupported personal attack. You might consider a sabbatical Biblicist. :thumbsup:
     
  6. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    No sabbatical necessary. Just the plain truth! You are preaching "another gospel" which does not repent from "dead works." That is the simple truth - not a slander, not a personal attack - just the plain simple truth.
     
  7. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137

    You don't even try to harmonize Scripture. You demonstrate in this post right here how you have Scripture contradicting Scripture.

    Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

    Romans 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:

    Both teach "by faith alone," but you don't want to believe what the Scriptures teach.
    Did you mention the context? No.
    Did you explain the context? No.
    Do you even know the context of James? Apparently not.

    The context of the book is important.
    The context of the book of James is: "Practical Christian living." It is directed to Christians in general about their daily walk with Christ. It is not so much a theology book but rather about practical advice.

    Then in chapter two, we encounter a chapter on the subject of faith and its practical implications. Paul writes a theological treatise on the doctrine of soteriology in the book of Romans and covers this subject very carefully and deeply from the theological side. James looks at it from a practical view. How does one put their faith into practice.

    James gives examples to prove his point?
    James 2:15-16 If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
    --This is one of many concrete examples of faith put into action that James gives. He is speaking of Christianity, not about salvation. Every verse here speaks about the Christian life.

    James 2:18 Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
    --This is the key verse of this chapter.
    Don't just tell me you have faith. Demonstrate it! He tells the reader that he will demonstrate his faith by his works. His faith is the outcome of a genuine relationship with Jesus Christ.

    James 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well: the devils also believe, and tremble.
    --His faith is not just knowledge. His faith is a relationship with Christ. The object of his faith is Christ. Faith must have an object. The object of the demons faith is not Christ.

    James 2:23-24 And the scripture was fulfilled which saith, Abraham believed God, and it was imputed unto him for righteousness: and he was called the Friend of God.
    24 Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only.
    --Look carefully at verse 23. It is in harmony with Rom.4:3. In fact it is almost word for word the same. He believed God. Therefore he was made righteous. It was not by works. It was by faith and faith alone.
    --Verse 24 is the outcome of his faith. He was justified by faith. The works were the outcome of the faith. This is made clear by verse 23. The two verses cannot contradict each other. "I will show you my faith by my works" he says. And so Abraham did.
     
  8. Heavenly Pilgrim

    Heavenly Pilgrim New Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2006
    Messages:
    9,295
    Likes Received:
    0
    HP: No they do not. Faith always co-exists with obedience just as James points out. Faith 'alone' as you would have it is dead faith at best.

    Just as believing is not alone, but always co-exists with repentance, faith is not alone but is always co-joined with obedience. Scripture often uses the words, ' belief or faith,' by themselves but that which they are co-joined with is always implied when not stated. Do not take my word for it. Ask James. Faith without works is DEAD, being alone. Devils also believe but are not saved. Belief alone will not save save anyone either, yet is saves. Do you ever wonder what belief must be co-joined with to be saving faith, YET, Scripture simply states in one place, "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and thou shalt be saved." Consider it carefully.


    HP: Take some practial advice from the book of James. Believe that when he says faith without works is dead being alone, that such is the gospel truth.:thumbs:
     
    #48 Heavenly Pilgrim, Apr 15, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 15, 2012
  9. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137

    As I said, as long as you refuse the context of the book, you will never grasp the understanding of the book. There is nothing I can do for you. You have the Bible contradicting itself and are perfectly content at leaving it that way.
     
  10. preacher4truth

    preacher4truth Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,121
    Likes Received:
    17
    Utterly ridiculous thinking here concerning the OP title, although I am not surprised in the least.

    If we are pardoned by works, Christ died in vain, which is exactly the case for those thinking their 'pardon' comes by works as they can and never will (without the grace of God) fully trust in Him alone.
     
  11. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jesus says the Father and he will make their home with the one who obeys (give them the Holy Spirit), and James says faith without deeds is dead. You are the perfect example of whom Peter speaks when he says about Paul, “He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.”
    Paul is explaining that we do not have to work for our salvation, as in various ceremonial washings, because faith in Jesus’ blood cleanses us. We no longer have to observe special days, because Jesus is who those days were about. We no longer have to make animal sacrifices for sin, because Jesus is the sacrificial Lamb.
    You make Jesus and James contradict the Bible when you misunderstand Paul! Faith without works is dead! It you do not obey Jesus, then you do not love him, and he will not reveal himself to you. THAT IS THE WORD OF GOD. People gladly misunderstand Paul so that they do not have to give up any sins. What a job the devil has people doing, teaching that we do not have to obey.
     
  12. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    Do you believe "the works of the law" are restricted to only the ceremonial aspects of the Mosaic Law? If so, how do you support that restrictive view?




    In Romans 3:24-4:25 Paul is dealing only with the doctrine of justification by faith "without works". Abraham lived prior to the Mosaic Law and therefore "without works" in Romans 4:5-6 cannot possibly refer to any aspect of the Mosaic law. So your intepretation of Romans 4:1-6 "without works" is impossible.

    However, in Romans 6-8 Paul deals with the doctrine of justification without works in connection with regenerative life which is evidenced by good works/obedience. The obedience or good works originate with regenerative life not justification by faith.

    James 2:14-26 makes no theological distinction between justification and regeneration but sees them as they are - inseparable - in the sphere of practical Christian living. Hence, where there are no good works in the practical life of a professed Christian there is no basis to believe there is any justification by faith.

    The issue you are missing is that Paul is dealing with Justification by faith without works as a distinct theological aspect of salvation apart from regenerative life in Romans 3:24-5:1. However, in Romans 6-8 Paul deals with the PRACTICAL inseperable connection of justification by faith with regenerative life which is manifest by good works/obedience.

    James is not dealing with justification by faith as a theological treatise but with justification by faith as a PRACTICAL application to daily Christian living which is inseparable from regenerative life and good works. There is no contradiction between Paul and James. Paul is dealing with justification from the theological aspect in Romans 4 distinct from regeneration while James is dealing with the pratical application where there is no distinction in the Christian LIFE between justification and regenerative life. Think about what I said carefully before responding.
     
  13. annsni

    annsni Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    20,914
    Likes Received:
    706
    You see, you make works the commander of faith. The Scriptures say that faith is the commander of works. Faith produces works. Works do not produce faith. THAT is the Word of God.

    A man can do all the works in the world yet be unsaved and the thief on the cross had no works yet was saved. THAT is the Word of God.
     
  14. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    You have stated it very well, short and succinct.
     
  15. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    Colossians 2:14 having canceled the written code, with its regulations, that was against us and that stood opposed to us; he took it away, nailing it to the cross.
    Ephesians 2:15 by abolishing in his flesh the law with its commandments and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new man out of the two, thus making peace,
    Colossians 2:14 Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day.
    Romans 14:17 For the kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace and joy in the Holy Spirit,
    Galatians 4:9 But now that you know God--or rather are known by God--how is it that you are turning back to those weak and miserable principles? Do you wish to be enslaved by them all over again? 10 You are observing special days and months and seasons and years!
    Hebrews 9:10 They are only a matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washings--external regulations applying until the time of the new order.
    Hebrews 13:9 Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings. It is good for our hearts to be strengthened by grace, not by ceremonial foods, which are of no value to those who eat them.
    Read all of Hebrews 9.
    You reference Romans 3:24 and claim Paul speaks about works being repentance…yet Paul speaks about CIRCUMCISION just 6 scriptures later!
    You reference Romans 4:25 and claim Paul speaks about works being repentance…yet Paul speaks about CIRCUMCISION in Romans 4 as the ONLY example of WORKS. Where anywhere in the Bible is works and NO REPENTANCE CONNECTED? NOWHERE is that in the Bible.

    Circumcision came to Abraham! Circumcision is a work of the law.

    You do not speak the truth. James says Abraham’s faith was working with his actions. Nowhere do we get that it is only after some kind of regeneration. You speak strange doctrines that are not in the Bible.
     
  16. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    Since I believe the whole Mosaic law was abolished, then obviously the ceremonial was abolished. So your texts prove nothing unless you can prove that the civil and moral law as part of the Old Covenant was not abolished. Romans 3:19-20 includes the moral law because the moral law is included at the beginning of this dissertation on the law in Romans 2:16-18. Both the ceremonial and moral law are included in Romans 2:16-26 and this is the law Paul continues to speak of right into Romans 3:19-20. Indeed, in Romans 7:7 the tenth commandment is inclusive in the law Paul speaks about, thus proving that the words we are not "under the law" in Romans 6:14 includes all the law, civil, ceremonial, moral. Hence, you have offered no exclusive evidence at all. Indeed, all the law, both moral, ceremonial and civil was given by handwriting as Moses had to write the moral law himself.

    Rom. 7:7 ¶ What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

    Rom. 2:21 Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself? thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal?
    22 Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?




    I think you better recheck you facts here. Romans 3:30 is a DENIAL that circumsion plays any difference in justification by faith not an affirmation and not an example. Circumcision is the very first applicable work performed upon a Jewish Infant that represents his committment to the WHOLE MOSAIC LAW. Romans 3:19-20 involves the WHOLE MOSAIC LAW as Romans 2:16-27 includes the TEN COMMANDMENTS as well as the ceremonial law.

    Rom. 3:30 Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.



    Again, you need to recheck your assumptions. Romans 4:6-12 is a DENIAL that circumcision or uncircumcision plays any part in justification by faith. There was no MOSAIC LAW at all when Abraham lived and so this cannot possibly be used to support your position.

    Rom. 4:11 And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:



    "repentance from dead works" - Heb. 6:2


    There was no Mosaic Law when Abraham lived. Hence, circumcision at the time of Abraham did not represent the Mosaic Law but represented ALL WORKS regardless of what they may be. This is a complete repudiation of your whole position.


    That was my very point. James is speaking of the PRACTICAL DAILY relationship between justification by faith and works which includes the regenerate condition of Abraham. However, Paul is not referring to the PRACTICAL DAILY relationship between faith and works but is speaking of the THEOLOGICAL distinction of justification by faith to works or "without works." Paul deals with the PRACTICAL DAILY relationship between justification by faith and regenerative works in Romans 6-8. Hence, there is no contradiction between Romans 4:6 "without works" and James 2 "by his works." You simply are not understanding the different contexts.


    "For we are His workmanship [1] CREATED IN CHRIST JESUS [2] unto good works...."

    Good works are the product of God's CREATIVE work within us. That creative work is described as the new birth as this is God's work not man's work ("his workmanship") as we are born not of the will of man, or the will of the flesh or of blood but of God (Jn. 1:13). James 1:18 says explicitly we are born again by God - He begat us by his own will. The "new" man is described as a "new creature" and it is from this new creature that "good works" originate within man. This is simply the abc's of Biblical doctrine.

    James 1:18 Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.
     
    #56 The Biblicist, Apr 15, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 15, 2012
  17. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    The commands that a person should be put to death, for instance for adultery, that is abolished.
    However, for you to believe and teach that not committing adultery is abolished is laughable.
    When “The Law” is spoken of in the scriptures, it is not separated, as you are separating it. Remember that when you study those scriptures. Never is not sinning abolished. Sin is never okay.
    You need to pay more attention. You used Romans to try to prove no works means we do not have to repent and stop sinning! I have shown you that all of Romans 4 is about no works meaning things like circumcision.


    Dead works meaning acts that lead to death!



    Circumcision means nothing now. Uncircumcision is nothing now, BUT WHERE DO YOU GET THAT THE BIBLE SAYS REPENTANCE IS NOTHING, OR THAT BEING FAITHFUL TO YOUR WIFE IS NOTHING.

    1 Corinthians 7:19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing. Keeping God's commands is what counts.
     
    #57 Moriah, Apr 15, 2012
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 15, 2012
  18. The Biblicist

    The Biblicist Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2011
    Messages:
    16,008
    Likes Received:
    481
    You are admitting that the PENALTY of that law has been abolished. Good! Because that is the sense in which I mean the whole moral law has been abolished because Christ paid the PENALTY in full and thus we are not under any of the Law for condemnation. It has also been abolished as a theocratic government administration.

    I never said sin was ok. I only said the whole law is abolished in regard to PENALTY because Christ paid it in full. I only said the theocratic government administration on earth is abolished. We are no longer under the condemnation of the Law if we have been "justified by faith" as justification denies we are under any penal consequences of the law or else we are not justified.

    And you are wrong! Romans 4 denies we are justified by any kind of works before or after the law was given in Moses. Works is not of grace as verse 4 states clearly. Abraham was justified BEFORE he was circumcised and the works he was talking about were the works PRIOR TO circumcision in verses 1-6. Romans 3:9-11 proves he is talking about MORAL WORKS as only the MORAL law can define "good" and "righteousness" which are MORAL terms not ceremonial terms. The law under consideration is both the ten commandments or moral law and the ceremonial law or any law of righteousness as Romans 2:16-26 includes the ten commandments as well as circumcision.



    Which refers to justification by keeping MORAL, CIVIL, CEREMONIAL laws as he is talking to Jews. Law keeping is called "dead" works because all have already failed what the law demands and the condemnation for failure is DEATH - Rom. 6:23!




    IT NEVER EVER MEANT ANYTHING AT ANY TIME concerning justification before God becuase Paul explicitly states that Abraham and all who are children of faith are justified by faith with or without circumcision as circumcision makes no difference to anyone at anytime in regard to justification because Abraham was justified by faith BEFORE he was circumcised and BEFORE the Mosaic law instituted ceremonial laws.



    I never said it is nothing or that it is not wrong. I only said the condemnation for violating those laws has already been paid in full and there is no condemnation to those who are justified by faith or else they are not justified at all.

    Compare that text and its context with this verse by Paul in a similar book dealing with the very same subject:

    Gal. 6:15 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.

    It is the "new creature" that produces "good works" ("For we are his workmanship CREATED in Christ Jesus UNTO good works...."). Obedience is a consequence of regeneration not justification.
     
  19. Moriah

    Moriah New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,540
    Likes Received:
    0
    I cannot believe you think that we do not have to obey the moral law. You believe that God nailed NOT SINNING to the cross.
    Sin is never okay. God did not do away with doing right.

    I am the one who is telling you that Abraham was justified BEFORE he was circumcised. Circumcision is a work of the law.
    Those scriptures do not support your beliefs. Romans 3 is about no one is righteous and never sins. It is about the Jews who were God’s chosen people sinned just like anyone else.
     
  20. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Moriah, this is dishonest, and the type of dishonest posting you have often been guilty of. You need to stop.
     
Loading...