Do you believe Nicodemus was a Jew? Jesus told him that he needed to be SPIRITUALLY born again. If circumcision made the Jews all covenant members, adopted SPIRITUAL sons and heirs of the Abrahamic Promises then why did Jesus demand that full grown Jewish scholars like Nicodemus needed to be SPIRITUALLY born again???
Jesus was speaking! Receiving the Holy Spirit did not happen personally to all believers until the One who baptizes us with the Holy Spirit came!
Mark 1:8 I baptize you with water, but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit."
The truth is that NATURAL birth did not obtain ANY OF THOSE THINGS for the Jew but simply placed them in a BETTER POSITION to be exposed to the truth in order to obtain them.
I gave you scriptures explaining that the Jews were God’s children. Why do you not accept that?
God walked among the Israelites, not among the Gentiles.
Leviticus 26:12I will walk among you and be your God, and
you will be my people.
Exodus 6:7 I will take you as
my own people, and I will be your God. Then you will know that I am the LORD your God, who brought you out from under the yoke of the Egyptians.
Exodus 29:45 hen I will dwell among the
Israelites and be their God.
Deuteronomy 23:14 For the LORD your God moves about in your camp to protect you and to deliver your enemies to you. Your camp must be holy, so that he will not see among you anything indecent and turn away from you.
2 Samuel 7:7 Wherever I have moved with all the
Israelites, did I ever say to any of their rulers whom I commanded to shepherd my people Israel, "Why have you not built me a house of cedar?"'
What do you not get about the Israelites, the Jews, were God's people.
Natural born circumcised Jews were no more the SPIRITUAL children of God than natural born uncircumcised gentiles and this is the very point Paul makes in Romans 4:9-12 speaking of PRE-cross Abraham and Galatains 6:15
It was the law to be circumcised! God was going to kill Moses for not circumcising his son.
Don't respond that this applies only to Post-cross Christians as Galatians 3:17 explicitly states that Abraham a PRE-cross and PRE-Jew and PRE-Mosaic person was "in Christ" and justified prior to circumcision:
However, ABRAHAM STILL HAD TO BE CIRCUMCISED. GENTILES WERE NOT CIRCUMCISED. ABRAHAM IS THE FOREFATHER TO THE JEWS. THE JEWS WERE CHOSEN BECAUSE OF WHO THEIR FOREFATHERS WERE.
Gal. 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
The promise of something that was going to happen; however, you preach that it was a promise already fulfilled and active! If the promise already existed in Abraham’s day, then why did Abraham have to be circumcised in the flesh? If the promise was already given in the Old Testament, then WHY DOES THE WORD OF GOD SAY THOSE PEOPLE DID NOT RECEIVE THE THINGS PROMISED!
Gentiles were excluded and without God. What do you not get about that?
The blood of Jesus did not save people until Jesus shed his blood on the cross.
Abraham still had to wait to see Jesus’ day. All the righteous in the Old Testament, they still knew that they were not serving themselves, but THOSE IN THE TIME OF THE NEW TESTAMENT.
Matthew 13:17
For I tell you the truth, many prophets and righteous men longed to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it.
Hebrews 11:13
All these people were still living by faith when they died. They did not receive the things promised; they only saw them and welcomed them from a distance. And they admitted that they were aliens and strangers on earth.
You have JERKED it out of context. He goes right on and denies that all Israel is of Israel whereas your very argument demands the opposite. He is denying that PHYSICAL BIRTH and CIRCUMCISION "according to the flesh" makes a Jew a true SPIRITUAL child of God:
All such are merely "children of the flesh" and such "ARE NOT THE CHILDREN OF GOD."
I did not jerk anything out of context. You deny the scriptures.
The people of Israel.
Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises. Romans 9:4.Go read again what I just wrote above.
Abraham still had to be circumcised. All those from Abraham on still had to be circumcised. Do you still not understand? They who were RIGHTEOUS STILL HAD TO BE CIRCUMCISED.
Read about Job. Job would sacrifice burnt offering for each of his children, incase they sinned and cursed God in their hearts!
Job 1:5 When a period of feasting had run its course, Job would send and have them purified. Early in the morning he would sacrifice a burnt offering for each of them, thinking, "Perhaps my children have sinned and cursed God in their hearts." This was Job's regular custom.
Did you read that? If a Christian sins in their heart, they confess to God, and Jesus intercedes for them, this was not possible in the Old Testament!
Ephesians 2:12 is POST-Great Commission context! Prior to the giving of the Great Commission to go into "all nations" God PRIMARILY (but not totally) saved people from among the Jews (not all Jews) while saving SOME from among Gentiles (Adam, Eve, Abel, Seth, Noah, Shem, Abraham, Rahab, Ruth, Ninevites, etc.).
You speak nonsense. The Jews were the children of God. It was them and not other nations and people. You speak of people being saved before the Jews, but the Jews were saved because of whom their fore fathers were! Yet you act if their forefathers were not related to them. You act as if all nations of people were God’s people.
Deuteronomy 7:8
But it was because the LORD loved you and kept the oath he swore to your forefathers that he brought you out with a mighty hand and redeemed you from the land of slavery, from the power of Pharaoh king of Egypt.
Deuteronomy 4:37
Because he loved your forefathers and chose their descendants after them, he brought you out of Egypt by his Presence and his great strength,
However, after the Great Commission to "all nations" it is now REVERSED. God saves PRIMARILY (but not totally) among the "nations" (Gentiles) while saving SOME from among the Jews (3,000 on Pentecost, 5000 in Acts 5; Paul, etc.).
The Gentiles were not God’s people in the Old Testament. No matter how many times you repeat that untruth. You try to justify your false teachings by saying "primarily," but you cannot get out of your false teachings by throwing in the word 'primarily.'
There is no salvation OUTSIDE of Christ before the cross (Jn. 14:6) for ANYONE as Abraham was saved "IN CHRIST" (Gal. 3:17).
Read what I said above, for the promise was not fulfilled UNTIL JESUS CAME in the flesh.
The Jews had the works of the law. Even though a Jew had faith, they STILL had to do what God said to do, and that was to be circumcised. Remember Moses, he was a man of God, yet God was going to kill Moses for not obeying and circumcising his son. Jews would be cut off for not being circumcised.
How could he redeem "us" from the "curse of the law" if as you say we were not under that law as described in verse 10????
Paul FIRST talks about
ALL WHO RELY ON THE LAW. THEN Paul tells us that Gentiles received what was promised
THROUGH JESUS CHRIST. Through Jesus’ shed blood on the cross. The Gentiles were included through the gospel!
NOT BEFORE, AS YOU KEEP TEACHING.
Ephesians 2:13
But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near through the blood of Christ.
Ephesians 3:6 This mystery is that
through the gospel the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus.
DID YOU READ THAT? THROUGH THE GOSPEL, THE GENTILES ARE HEIRS TOGETHER WITH ISRAEL, NOT BEFORE. SO STOP GOING AGAINST THE TRUTH AND PREACHING UNTRUTHS.
Circumcision may not be "a" work of the law that the Gentile is held accountable for due to ignorance but the Gentile is held accountable for the MEANING of circumcision - which is merely a symbol of the NEW BIRTH - and Abel, Noah, Seth, Abraham, Rahab were all BORN AGAIN Gentiles just as the PRE-Cross Jew circumcised Nicodemus needed to be "born again" or he could not "see" or "enter" the kingdom of God. HENCE CIRCUMCISION WAS MEANINGLESS apart from new birth as circumcision made Nicodemus a child of God ACCORDING TO THE FLESH but not ACCORDING TO THE SPIRIT - proving that Rom. 9:5-6 was applicable prior to the cross as much as after the cross.
You are the false teacher and the proof is that you are INCAPABLE of understanding the scriptures and you jerk everything out of context.
Circumcision was not meaningless in the Old Covenant! God was going to kill Moses when Moses did not circumcise his son. The Gentiles were NOT included with Israel, true Israel, not until the GOSPEL, not until Jesus’ SHED BLOOD.
How you can say circumcision is meaningless in the Old Testament is proof of your falseness.