savedbymercy
New Member
It is impossible to convince a Mormon that he is wrong!
Yes, except if they are an elect and its God's Time to reveal them the Truth. Nothing can hinder that, if they are an Elect, not even being a mormon !
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It is impossible to convince a Mormon that he is wrong!
The problem Brother Biblicist is this:
Thank you for just confirming exactly what I suspected and charged. You are not here to be objective at all but clearly you are here to proselyte. Please do take your vain reasonings elsewhere because we have enough false teaching on this forum already without one more doing it by sleight of hand.
No, I grew up with people like you in the fundamentalist Baptist churches: angry, intorlerant, verbally abusive, and with the attitude "if you don't agree with me its because you aren't a true believer."
Thank God the overwhelming majority of Baptists are good, loving, kind Christian people. Not like you. Shame on you.
I am seeking the truth, not trying to convert.
If I really am "lost" as you seem to insinuate, you just drove me away from your "truth" by your un-Christ like attitude and behavior.
Your arguments are speculative, philsophical, historical in direct opposition to clear and undenialbe Biblical evidence. You simply repeat your speculations, philsophical and historical arguments and refuse to deal with the Biblical evidence against your interpretations.
So, why waste my time and your time? It is a merry go round discussion that gets nowhere.
Again, you attack the person because you cannot possibly attack the evidence I presented as it is irrefutable. Neither do you even attempt to address it! So why waste my time and your time???
Your arguments are speculative, philsophical, historical in direct opposition to clear and undenialbe Biblical evidence. You simply repeat your speculations, philsophical and historical arguments and refuse to deal with the Biblical evidence against your interpretations.
So, why waste my time and your time? It is a merry go round discussion that gets nowhere.
Again, you attack the person because you cannot possibly attack the evidence I presented as it is irrefutable. Neither do you even attempt to address it! So why waste my time and your time???
I certaninly hope that when you are sharing the Good News of our Savior with a truly "lost" person that you show a little more patience. Most people are not going to drop their long held beliefs immediately just because YOU believe that YOUR viewpoint is irrrefutable and therefore DEMAND their complete and total surrender to your position after discussing just one passage of Scripture with them!
I'm saved, my faith is in Christ for my salvation, nothing else, including my decision to be baptized. Offending me really has no consequences in the big scheme of things.
Someone else that you may be dealing with here on the BB or out in life, however, may not be saved, and your attitude could turn him away from Christ. The consequences could be eternally damning!
Sadly, if you really are Calvinist you probably don't even believe your actions matter in that situation. The person you have offended is either one of the Elect or he isn't. It makes being self-righteous and rude to people consequence-free. "The guy's destiny is predetermined, poor sap, my actions will not affect the outcome." What a sad, sad theology!
At the very beginning of this discussion I conceded that the scriptures teach clearly that baptism remits sins, regenerates and saves. However, that is not the issue. The issue is HOW does baptism remit sins, regenerates and saves? Literally or figatively.
So, if I conceded that all the paedobaptist translations and paedbaptism grammarians are correct what would that prove? Nothing at all! Still the issue would be does baptism literally or figuratively accomplish these things.
That issue is clearly settled by scripture that by design are intended to answer that very issue - Hebrews 10:1-4; Romans 4:6-11; 1 Pet. 3:21.
Romans 4:7-11 is the absolute death to paedobaptism and all other forms of sacramentalism for several reasons.
1. It is by design the doctrinal explanation of what does and does not constitutes justification by faith.
2. It is by design the presentation of a precross man as the example of justification by faith to "ALL WHO ARE OF FAITH" regardless if they are pre-cross (like Abraham) or post cross.
3. It is by repeated design the example of a PRE-circumcision Abraham example rather than a POST-circumcision example.
4. It is by design to be a doctrinal explanation of the relationship between pre-circumcision justification by faith and external divine rites clearly stated to be an external "sign" and "seal" of something already in possesson LONG BEFORE submission to such rites.
This passage is not taken from a recorded sermon or summary statement by someone as is Acts 2:38; 22:16; or something that must be inferred as John 3:3-5; Titus 3:5; etc. This is by intent designed to be the doctrinal explanation of justification by faith and its proper relationship with external rites not for merely some but for "ALL WHO ARE OF FAITH."
I am going to study the topics you have just discussed. I intend to do so with an open mind and more importantly an open heart for God to speak to me through his Word. As I said earlier, it is my personal belief that of all Christian denominations, there are two whose interpretation seem the most plausible to me, Lutherans and Baptists.
I'm going to study it alone, however. I have come to the conclusion that instead of spending one to two hours a day debating/arguing on this website, my time would be better spent reading the Bible and sharing the Gospel with others.
I have listened intently to your position. I plan to study it more. Again, however, I encourage you to have a little more patience with those who do not agree with you. God bless you, brother Biblicist.
Dear brother,
Your use of the Greek word "eis" goes against the rules of Greek grammar. See below:
Because of this flexibility with reference to “for,” some have assumed that the Greek word eis has the same flexibility, and therefore baptism is not to obtain the forgiveness of one’s sins; rather, it is engaged because of pardon received already (presumably at the point of faith). There are several things to be said in response to this ploy.
English Is Not Greek
Just because the English “for” has some elasticity, and thus may point to a precedent circumstance, such does not mean that the Greek preposition eis has similar properties.
The Greek term eis is found about 1,750 times in the New Testament. While it has a variety of meaning shades, it always is prospective (forward looking), and is never retrospective (backward looking) in its direction.
It is “an indicator of direction toward a goal, not as an indicator of location without direction” (Balz, 398). The preposition is used with the accusative case, meaning it points to the object of verbal action. Thus eis generally is translated by such terms as in, into, unto, to, toward, etc. It is a goal-oriented term.
Theology and Grammar Matters
Theologically speaking, the construction of the compound verbs — “repent and be baptized” — connected with the prepositional phrase — “for the forgiveness of sins” — demonstrates that the sense of eis cannot possibly be “because of,” thus conveying the sense, “on account of the forgiveness of your sins." And why is that?
Because it would equally affirm that one is required to “repent” because of the forgiveness of his sins. Who in the world subscribes to the notion that one repents of sin because his transgressions are forgiven already? That makes no sense at all.
Comparative Passages Highlight the Truth
In Matthew 26:28 there is an identical construction of eis, conjoined with the terms “forgiveness of sins,” just as in Acts 2:38.
In the Matthew text, as he institutes the communion supper, Jesus said: “this is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many unto remission of sins.”
Even the renowned Baptist scholar, A. T. Robertson, who attempted to twist Acts 2:38 into conformity with his personal theological agenda, was forced to surrender his position when discussing Matthew 26:28. Of the controversial phrase he stated:
“The purpose of the shedding of his blood of the New Covenant was precisely to remove (forgive) sins” (210; emphasis added).
In his massive Historical Grammar, Robertson suggested that sometimes “grammar” has to give way to “theology” (389). Is that any way to treat the verbally inspired word of God? Yet that is how Robertson sought to dispose of Acts 2:38. For shame!
If you will remember, you asked me if I would study a book of the New Testament with you. I suggested the book of Romans but you never responded. Instead you started into Matthew.
Studying a passage is always better than "debating" a passage as the very nature of debate includes strife.
Romans 4 is designed by Paul to expand on why faith as a principle ("law") excludes all boasting (Rom. 3:27). Hence, he introduces selected aspects of Abraham's life (Gen. 15; Gen. 17, Gen. 22) and one aspect from David's life (Psa. 32) to illustrate that justification by the principle of faith excludes everything that would provide any grounds of boasting before God. It excludes his own personal works (vv. 1-3). It excludes any personal obedience to divine rites (vv. 9-11). It excludes any personal obedience to the Law of God (vv. 12-15). It excludes any and all co-partcipant actions by Abraham (vv. 16-21). Intermittantly, Paul tells his readers that Abraham's example is applicable to "all who are of faith" (vv. 11-12, 16) and directly applies it to his readers own justification by faith in the gospel (4:22-5:2).
Here is the Greek Orthodox position on Baptism and their English interpretation of some of the verses in question:
http://theorthodoxchurch.info/blog/ocrc/2009/06/infant-baptism-as-scriptural-tradition/
Here is the Greek Orthodox position on salvation:
Orthodox Creed
Orthodox Catechism
GOD THE FATHER:
GOD THE FATHER is the fountainhead of the Holy Trinity. The Scriptures reveal the one God is Three Persons -- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit -- eternally sharing the one divine nature. From the Father the Son is begotten before all ages and all time (Psalm 2:7; II Corinthians 11:31). It is from the Father that the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds (John 15:26). God the Father created all things through the Son, in the Holy Spirit (Genesis 1 and 2; John 1:3; Job 33:4), and we are called to worship Him (John 4:23). The Father loves us and sent His Son to give us everlasting life (John 3:16).
JESUS CHRIST
JESUS CHRIST is the Second Person of the Holy Trinity, eternally born of the Father. He became man, and thus He is at once fully God and fully man. His coming to earth was foretold in the Old Testament by the prophets. Because Jesus Christ is at the heart of Christianity, the Orthodox Church has given more attention to knowing Him than to anything or anyone else.
In reciting the Nicene Creed, Orthodox Christians regularly affirm the historic faith concerning Jesus as they say, "I believe... in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only begotten, begotten of the Father before all ages, Light of Light, true God of true God; begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father; by Whom all things were made; Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary, and was made man; and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried; and the third day He rose again according to the Scriptures; and ascended into heaven, and sits at the right hand of the Father; and He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead; Whose kingdom shall have no end."
THE HOLY SPIRIT
THE HOLY SPIRIT is one of the Persons of the Holy Trinity and is one in essence with the Father. Orthodox Christians repeatedly confess, "And I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of life, Who proceeds from the Father, Who together with the Father and the Son is worshipped and glorified..." He is called the "promise of the Father" (Acts 1:4), given by Christ as a gift to the Church, to empower the Church for service to God (Acts 1:8), to place God's love in our hearts (Romans 5:5), and to impart spiritual gifts (I Corinthians 12:7-13) and virtues (Galatians 5:22, 23) for Christian life and witness. Orthodox Christians believe the biblical promise that the Holy Spirit is given through chrismation (anointing) at baptism (Acts 2:38). We are to grow in our experience of the Holy Spirit for the rest of our lives.
INCARNATION
INCARNATION refers to Jesus Christ coming "in the flesh". The eternal Son of God the Father assumed to Himself a complete human nature from the Virgin Mary. He was (and is) one divine Person, fully possessing from God the Father the entirety of the divine nature, and in His coming in the flesh fully possessing a human nature from the Virgin Mary. By His Incarnation, the Son forever possesses two natures in His one Person. The Son of God, limitless in His divine nature, voluntarily and willingly accepted limitation in His humanity in which He experienced hunger, thirst, fatigue -- and ultimately, death. The Incarnation is indispensable to Christianity -- there is no Christianity without it. The Scriptures record, "...every spirit that does not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God" (I John 4:3). By His Incarnation, the Son of God redeemed human nature, a redemption made accessible to all who are joined to Him in His glorified humanity.
SIN
SIN literally means to "miss the mark." As St. Paul writes, "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God" (Romans 3:23). We sin when we pervert what God has given us as good, falling short of His purposes for us. Our sins separate us from God (Isaiah 59:1, 2), leaving us spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:1). To save us, the Son of God assumed our humanity, and being without sin "He condemned sin in the flesh" (Romans 8:3). In His mercy, God forgives our sins when we confess them and turn from them, giving us strength to overcome sin in our lives. "If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness" (I John 1:9).
SALVATION
SALVATION is the divine gift through which men and women are delivered from sin and death, united to Christ, and brought into His eternal kingdom. Those who heard St. Peter's sermon on the day of Pentecost asked what they must do to be saved. He answered, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2:38). Salvation begins with these three steps: 1) repent, 2) be baptized, and 3) receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. To repent means to change our mind about how we have been, to turn from our sin and to commit ourselves to Christ. To be baptized means to be born again by being joined into union with Christ. And to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit means to receive the Spirit Who empowers us to enter a new life in Christ, to be nurtured in the Church, and to be conformed to God's image.
Salvation demands faith in Jesus Christ. People cannot save themselves by their own good works. Salvation is "faith working through love". It is an ongoing, life-long process. Salvation is past tense in that, through the death and Resurrection of Christ, we have been saved. It is present tense, for we are "being saved" by our active participation through faith in our union with Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit. Salvation is also future, for we must yet be saved at His glorious Second Coming.
BAPTISM
BAPTISM is the way in which a person is actually united to Christ. The experience of salvation is initiated in the waters of baptism. The Apostle Paul teaches in Romans 6: 1-6 that in baptism we experience Christ's death and resurrection. In it our sins are truly forgiven and we are energized by our union with Christ to live a holy life. The Orthodox Church practices baptism by full immersion.
Currently, some consider baptism to be only an "outward sign" of belief in Christ. This innovation has no historical or biblical precedent. Others reduce it to a mere perfunctory obedience to Christ's command (cf. Matthew 28:19, 20). Still others, ignoring the Bible completely, reject baptism as a vital factor in salvation. Orthodoxy maintains that these contemporary innovations rob sincere people of the most important assurances that baptism provides -- namely that they have been united to Christ and are part of His Church.
NEW BIRTH
NEW BIRTH is receipt of new life. It is how we gain entrance into God's kingdom and His Church. Jesus said, "Unless one is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God" (John 3:5). From its beginning, the Church has taught that the "water" is the baptismal water and the "Spirit" is the Holy Spirit. The new birth occurs in baptism where we die with Christ, are buried with Him, and are raised with Him in the newness of His resurrection, being joined into union with Him in His glorified humanity (Acts 2:38; Romans 6:3, 4). The idea that being "born again" is a religious experience disassociated from baptism is a recent one and has no biblical basis whatsoever.
JUSTIFICATION
JUSTIFICATION is a word used in the Scriptures to mean that in Christ we are forgiven and actually made righteous in our living. Justification is not a once-for-all, instantaneous pronouncement guaranteeing eternal salvation, regardless of how wickedly a person might live from that point on. Neither is it merely a legal declaration that an unrighteous person is righteous. Rather, justification is a living, dynamic, day-to-day reality for the one who follows Christ. The Christian actively pursues a righteous life in the grace and power of God granted to all who continue to believe in Him.
SANCTIFICATION
SANCTIFICATION is being set apart for God. It involves us in the process of being cleansed and made holy by Christ in the Holy Spirit. We are called to be saints and to grow into the likeness of God. Having been given the gift of the Holy Spirit, we actively participate in sanctification. We cooperate with God, we work together with Him, that we may know Him, becoming by grace what He is by nature.
Dear Biblicist: I am only presenting the writings of the Greeks to see if the Greeks agree with your interpretation of the Greek word "eis". I am sure that you do not believe that your understanding of the Greek language is infallible. I am therefore trying to investigate how the Greeks themselves translate "eis". The Greek Orthodox translate the "for" in Acts 2:38 as the forward looking "for the purpose of" not the backward looking "because of". Here is another statement of this belief by the Greeks. Is there any evidence that they once believed otherwise?
I shortly will post the next passage of Scripture related to Salvation/Baptism.
http://www.goarch.org/ourfaith/ourfaith7067
The Greek Orthodox are wrong on so many other issues in spite of knowing the Greek!
Again, even if I concede their interpretation of eis is correct and mine is wrong it settles nothing! I have already admitted that baptism does in fact remit sins, saves, regenerates but that is not the issue. The issue is HOW does it do that and the argument over eis does not answer that question.