OldRegular
Well-Known Member
Yes, I read the entire footnote in my ESV Study Bible even though I did not quote all of it. The study bible says it became the proper name in the latter half chapter 2, 3,4, and 5 wherever it references the one man Adam. So, it appears that they thought the word in chapter 1 meant mankind in general. Hence, my point stands - the LCMS commission is latching on to any excuse to justify not reading the NIV11.
I would actually like to see them do a scholarly critique.
They have that right and though I am not Lutheran I applaud them.