Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
There is a difference between being a heretic and milking the suckers. It might be argued they have simply adopted/adapted right wing Capitalist doctrine as their business model.
So people like Copeland/Hagin who claim to be equal to God is not heretical in your opinion?
"Man...was created on terms of equality with God, and he could stand in God's presence without any consciousness of inferiority.....God has made us as much like Himself as possible....He mad us the same class of being that He is Himself......Man lived in the realm of God. He lived on terms equal with God....[T]he believer is called Christ......That's who we are; we're Christ."
I don't like using the word "heretic". Besides, people these days apply to it a meaning it did not originally have.
However, I have no problem with applying an appropriate term to people who would say such as you have quoted: "Nuts".
IF you are here, and are in a church or group that practices pentacostal stuff...
Do you see those like hagin/Copeland/Price/Hinn etc as being heretics, or as real christians teaching biblical truths?
IF you are here, and are in a church or group that practices pentacostal stuff...
Do you see those like hagin/Copeland/Price/Hinn etc as being heretics, or as real christians teaching biblical truths?
The term "heretic" (Tit. 3:10) is a very Biblical term and it is contextually used for these kind of people. Paul tells Titus to "reject" the "heretic" or a person who is so self willed or unreasonably opinionated against the truth that they cannot be instructed.
The term has developed in time to describe those who stubbornly hold to OPINIONS that are contrary to the faith once delivered.
A "heretic" was originally a holder of a minority opinion. You are buying into a definition hatched by state-churchists as an excuse to exterminate Dissenters.
You are overlooking Titus 3:10. Paul is not instructing Titus to "reject" those who hold a "minority opinion" but he is clearly defining a "heretic" as those who oppose the faith once delivered.
As I have pointed out before, from Rotherham's Emphasized Bible (most literal version), the word there is "party-man". That is more in line with the definition of heretic as a minority opinion, as such a person is a member of a faction.
>the faith once delivered.
"Once" means what?
The faith was delivered only once?
The faith after it was delivered?
19 Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.
20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.
(Something was) delivered into the care of the Apostles?
As I have pointed out before, from Rotherham's Emphasized Bible (most literal version), the word there is "party-man". That is more in line with the definition of heretic as a minority opinion, as such a person is a member of a faction.