Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
.....prior to The Fall as recorded in Genesis 3?
There was only one possible sin - eating from the forbidden tree.
I don't quite understand, you say that there was only one possible sin, however what if Adam decided to kill Eve or curse God, Ect.
The first human sin was Eve's. Adam followed shortly after.
I always wondered what woulda happened had Adam not followed Eve in sin?
The first human sin was Eve's. Adam followed shortly after.
I always wondered what woulda happened had Adam not followed Eve in sin?
No!!!!!
The Scriptures indicate that Eve was deceived and convinced that eating the fruit would make her wise. In essence she was tricked into taking the fruit, but Adam knowing full well, chose Eve over God.
That is why the Scriptures always place the blame upon Adam.
It would only be pure speculation about what might happen if Adam had not taken the fruit.
I am certain that Eve was the first to use womanly cunning to get Adam to be compliant - the same as all wives have done since.![]()
But if God knows everything and knew that Adam was the mastermind behind the phone type thing why would he Give even harsher punishment ofIncreased pain of labor during childbirth?everyone makes adam so innocent besides eating the fruit himself--what if adam was the serpent and he deceived eve to eat the fruit first--to see what would happen to her--since they didn't know what death was at that time--maybe he was curious to see and when nothing happened to her at that moment--then is when she gave unto adam and he ate of the fruit--the scripture says that adam was standing right there when the event took place soooo
--what if adam was the serpent and he deceived eve to eat the fruit first--
But if God knows everything and knew that Adam was the mastermind behind the phone type thing why would he Give even harsher punishment ofIncreased pain of labor during childbirth?
Did God condemn Adam to crawl on his belly and eat the dust of the earth? Adam was NOT the serpent!
everyone makes adam so innocent besides eating the fruit himself--what if adam was the serpent and he deceived eve to eat the fruit first--to see what would happen to her--since they didn't know what death was at that time--maybe he was curious to see and when nothing happened to her at that moment--then is when she gave unto adam and he ate of the fruit--the scripture says that adam was standing right there when the event took place soooo
Adam was NOT innocent!!!!!!
He and Eve (being the only humans of free will and choice) exercised that choice (Eve being deceived into believing a lie) and therefore Sin is passed upon all humankind through Adam.
Before the fall, Adam would never have even considered such a scenario as you suggested. Neither would Eve. It was the Serpent that introduced deceit - that is why he is referred to as the father of lies.
Btw, the Scripture do not state that Adam was standing right there. Eve could very well have eaten of the fruit some hours before, realizing her mistake, and instead of appealing to Adam about her being deceived through "confessing and forsaking" she chose force Adam to chose between God and Eve. He chose Eve - and hide from God. Humankind has hid from God ever since.
Eve was totally unprepared to even know what a lie was (until her eyes were open).
Adam knew where the food came from, and willingly took it.
Adam was NOT innocent!!!!!!
He and Eve (being the only humans of free will and choice) exercised that choice (Eve being deceived into believing a lie) and therefore Sin is passed upon all humankind through Adam.
Before the fall, Adam would never have even considered such a scenario as you suggested. Neither would Eve. It was the Serpent that introduced deceit - that is why he is referred to as the father of lies.
Btw, the Scripture do not state that Adam was standing right there. Eve could very well have eaten of the fruit some hours before, realizing her mistake, and instead of appealing to Adam about her being deceived through "confessing and forsaking" she chose force Adam to chose between God and Eve. He chose Eve - and hide from God. Humankind has hid from God ever since.
Eve was totally unprepared to even know what a lie was (until her eyes were open).
I totally disagree with your statement theres more proof of it being a man(Adam was the only man there) than there is of being a snake possessed by some fallen angel from God's abode--that there is NO scriptural proof of that event even taking place--it has caused man to give the glory to another god for Centuries now--There even isn't ant proof scripturally(in context)of angels being able to sin in the first place(angels are not flesh and blood like man)Angels are higher than mankind.
Gen. 3-6
And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food,and that it was pleasant to the eyes,and a tree to be desired to make one wise,she took of the fruit thereof,and did eat,AND GAVE UNTO HER HUSBAND WITH HER,and he did eat.
last part of that verse plainly states her husband WITH her--adam was with her the whole time there
Adam was NOT innocent!!!!!!
He and Eve (being the only humans of free will and choice) exercised that choice (Eve being deceived into believing a lie) and therefore Sin is passed upon all humankind through Adam.
Before the fall, Adam would never have even considered such a scenario as you suggested. Neither would Eve. It was the Serpent that introduced deceit - that is why he is referred to as the father of lies.
Btw, the Scripture do not state that Adam was standing right there. Eve could very well have eaten of the fruit some hours before, realizing her mistake, and instead of appealing to Adam about her being deceived through "confessing and forsaking" she chose force Adam to chose between God and Eve. He chose Eve - and hide from God. Humankind has hid from God ever since.
Eve was totally unprepared to even know what a lie was (until her eyes were open).
I totally disagree with your statement theres more proof of it being a man(Adam was the only man there) than there is of being a snake possessed by some fallen angel from God's abode--that there is NO scriptural proof of that event even taking place--it has caused man to give the glory to another god for Centuries now--There even isn't ant proof scripturally(in context)of angels being able to sin in the first place(angels are not flesh and blood like man)Angels are higher than mankind.
The verse just indicates that she gave it to the husband. Not WHEN she met up with him and gave it to him.
Adam was the caretaker of Eden. It is perhaps doubtful that he was near Eve in doing his duty.
Nor is it likely that Adam would not (as any good husband) stood up the the Serpent had he been present.
The time line in which you suggest may or may not be valid. We are not a party to the complete day of the characters, only a scene here and there.
Just as you surmise a certain timeline, it may have just as well been some other variant.
We DO know that when God came calling in the evening, they hid themselves, so these encounters must have happened sometime after breakfast.