Featured Where Did The Name Jesus Come From

I've proven that the word "jesus" is not related to paganism and that it is a natural development of cross-language transliteration. People who want to see conspiracies will find them every time.

 

Seems as though you are questioning the salvation of anyone who is in disagreement with you. I am very familiar with the Sacred Name cult and its false teachings about the Name of Jesus.

First you say that Jesus is the archangel Michael, then you say that the name of JESUS is not the correct Name of our Lord and Saviour. What will you come up with next? What you are promoting on this forum is clearly not Baptist nor is it Biblical doctrine. Then you have the audacity to judge me?

Please check the BB posting rules here

 

Yes, it was men with an agenda. Their agenda was to translate the Bible into English for an English speaking people.

I don't know if you realize this or not, but Yashua is not English. Nor is Yahushua.

 

Jesus wasn't called "Michael" either....but you have been arguing for the name Michael too. So which is it?

BTW, you claim that the "correct" name is in the "originals".....where are the "originals"?

 

You have a very low view both of the inspiration and of the preservation of the Bible. It is a wonder that you believe in the Bible at all the way that you have expressed yourself above.
Do you believe that we have the Word of God in the Bible today?

Certainly it was inspired in the original documents. It is not translations that we need to be so concerned about. We have over 5,000 manuscripts of the NT alone attesting to the veracity of it being a genuine document.
The Jews still use the Hebrew OT. Would they use something that is flawed? The Masoretic Text is basically the same as the one used in OT times.
If I have a question about the meaning of a word, it is not a translation that I need to consult, but the word in the original language, which God has preserved for us. It seems you have a problem with the preservation of God's Word and therefore cast aspersions and doubt as to its reliability.
This is a very weak argument and should not be used in debate.
The basis of debate here, in this forum, is that the Bible is the final authority in all matters of faith and doctrine. You should be able to accept that.
If you can't accept that why do you call yourself a Baptist?
Why are you posting in Baptist forums?
You should change your profile and tell us what you really are.

 

I can easily refute the garbage that you have been spouting on this thread.
But I would rather you answer my post directly instead of answering it with another question. Your line of argument is just what a J.W. would do.

 

I refute it. If any name or word is translated wrongly, the God is proven to be a liar and has not kept His promise to preserve His Word.

Your position calls God a liar and casts doubt on His Word.

 

I'm surprised that since you claim Jesus is a pagan invention that you even admit He is a Jew since that argument revolves on attacking the transliteration of the letter "J".

You are slandering other Christians over a name that you yourself are continuing to misspell, and I bet 2 egg shells to a bucket of sheep feed that you can't pronounce it right. I've rarely met any English speakers that can. It is so distinguishable that pronunciation was even used as a test in the OT. Judges 12:6

Furthermore, it is a fact that the NT was written in Greek. So why don't you use the Greek word for Christ when referring to Him-Christos? And have you ever seen the "first text"? And what source are you relying on from someone that has?

Although that's a pretty silly argument over the name Jesus being in the "original" considering that English was not developed until several hundred years later. Can you show evidence where the apostles followed your rules of translation into translating all of God's proper names in Hebrew the same way into Greek? Is שדי left that way in the Greek texts? Can you show from ANY source that אֲדֹנָי was retained in the same form in ANY GREEK TEXT that derived from the "originals" written by the apostles?

Unless you can literally THINK in Hebrew much less read and write it, your argument against the English usage is fallacious.

 

Did you just use the word, "God" to refer to who you believe in? I could have swore I just saw you write that the English Bibles do not correctly translate His name, and "God" is a usage of the Greek "Theos" which is also a term used to describe other 'gods'. So you are now violating your own rules.

If salvation depends on calling on your version of names, you are DOOMED:thumbs:

 

HW, why do you continue to avoid answering DHK's questions?