evenifigoalone
Well-Known Member
I seriously question if any assembly of the CCW folks would stick around very long if they didn't have music to bolster the meeting.
I would like to see a study group comparison. Three churches - one "traditional," one "CCW" and the other a "blend."
Remove the music totally from all three, Folks would hear preaching and pray - only.
Which one after one year showed growth and which one no longer existed would be something that might indicate just how shallow the CCW, traditional, and blend really are.
My own premiss is that most folks wouldn't last and the assemblies be left with a handful if still existing.
The music shouldn't be so much of a deciding factor, true enough.
There are underground churches in countries where Christians are so persecuted for their faith that they can't really sing at all--they just move their mouths like they're singing and don't make any noise so they won't be discovered.
A church is a church, with or without music.
I left my old church this year, but the biggest reason for that was that I didn't care for the emphasis they were puting on legalistic matters, repeating the same things over and over sermon after sermon. (One of them having to do with music.) It got to where it honestly drowned out anything else I could learn there.
To me, THE most important thing about a worship song is the lyrics.
But as far as basically saying you shouldn't be enjoying the music in order for it not to distract from worship, then your safest bet would be no music at all. Because I happen to think piano and organ music to be very enjoyable at times (especially as a pianist), and so do a good deal of people. There are some piano pieces I could seriously lose myself in, and that I love playing.
I love music. I view it as a form of art. And I am an artist, though my talents lie mostly in the visual department.
Last edited by a moderator: