• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Eschatology

Status
Not open for further replies.

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Oh brother.....I've NOW seen it all on here. Christ is not reigning now. That's a good'un DHK....


All from 1 Cor. 15:25:

25 For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.(KJV)

25 For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.(NIV)

25 for it behoveth him to reign till he may have put all the enemies under his feet --(YLT...slowly becoming my favorite translation)

25 For he must reign, till he hath put all his enemies under his feet.(ASV)

25 For [Christ] must be King and reign until He has put all [His] enemies under His feet.(AMP)

25 It is necessary for him to rule until he puts all enemies under his feet.(CEB)

25 For he has to rule until he puts all his enemies under his feet.(Complete Jewish Bible)

25 For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.(ESV)

25 For He must reign until He puts all His enemies under His feet.(HCSB)

25 For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet.(NASB)

25 For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.(RSV Catholic Version)

25 But it behooveth him to reign, till he put all his enemies under his feet.(Wycliffe)

25 For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet.(WEB)


Not one of these 13 versions agrees with your grotesquely heretical statement.


You need to bow before Him and repent of this vile, wicked, and slanderous to our King, post.
You must repent of the language you just used against me that really ought to be edited out.
You also need to find out the meaning of this verse that apparently you are ignorant of. What is the context? What is it speaking about?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
I notice you excluded yourself {DHK} from the above accusation.
No, I didn't.

Who killed JESUS many years ago? Who is guilty of a crime so low?
Why did HE have to die? What is the reason why? Who killed JESUS I would like to know?


Was it Hebrew children proud of who they were?
Shouting "CRUCIFY HIM" at their King.
Trading their Messiah for a common thief?
Turning down the kingdom HE could bring.

Who killed JESUS many years ago? Who is guilty of a crime so low?
Why did HE have to die? What is the reason why? Who killed JESUS I would like to know?

Was it Pontius Pilate, he was governor
Trying to decide that case that day
When he found the Savior had no fault HIS own
Was he guilty when he turned away?

Who killed JESUS many years ago? Who is guilty of a crime so low?
Why did HE have to die? What is the reason why? Who killed JESUS I would like to know?

Was it Roman soldiers with their tools of war
Driving nails through hands that did no wrong
Mocking and abusing, crowning HIM with thorns
Oh the evidence is very strong!

Who killed JESUS many years ago? Who is guilty of a crime so low?
Why did HE have to die? What is the reason why? Who killed JESUS I would like to know?


When I think of JESUS and the way HE died
How upon HIM all my sins were lain
All the other people fade away from view
It for me the sacrifice was made.


I no longer wonder any more. I have found what I was searching for
My sin demanded hell, on HIM the judgement fell

It is plain to see, that it was really me.

http://itrustobey.blogspot.ca/2010/04/who-killed-jesus.html

 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally Posted by OldRegular
Thus we have the Classic Dispensational teaching that the Church for which Jesus Christ died is a parenthesis, an intercalation, an afterthought in Gods program for Israel
.
DHK, In response to my remarks above you responded as follows:

Originally Posted by DHK
A very terse and unwise comment. Whoever said that has no reverence for God, and is speaking as an unsaved individual. There is nothing done in the providence of God that is "an afterthought." No dispensationalist would agree with the above assessment. It is just a foolish random rambling said from one who is not using his brain.

Now you and I both know that your response referred to me as an unsaved individual and one not using his brain. In response I have shown where several different dispensational leaders, Ryrie, Chafer, and Ironside, have used the term names "parenthesis" and "intercalation" in reference to the Church. You have appropriated the purview of God and and condemned these men because they referred to the Church {For which Jesus Christ died.} as a parenthesis or intercalation.

Do you stand by your condemnation of these men, and by inference me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
.
DHK, In response to my remarks above you responded as follows:



Now you and I both know that your response referred to me as an unsaved individual and one not using his brain. In response I have shown where several different dispensational leaders, Ryrie, Chafer, and Ironside, have used the term names "parenthesis" and "intercalation" in reference to the Church. You have appropriated the purview of God and and condemned these men because they referred to the Church {For which Jesus Christ died.} as a parenthesis or intercalation.

Do you stand by your judgment of these men, and by inference me?
First, I replied to quotes not knowing who said them. They were in quotes, the author of the quotes were not given.
Second I stand by what I said.
Third, for example. Anyone who says: that what God does or thinks is simply "an afterthought" is not thinking straight. He is not using his brain. In fact he is thinking or even speaking AS an unsaved person would. Who would say that kind of thing or make that kind of accusation against God. My words still stand.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
No, I didn't.

The following is from your post #123. I don't see DHK mentioned!

That is simply history.
Your sin is a crime against God, and you are just as guilty as those Jews in putting Christ on the cross. Just because you live in a different century doesn't make you any less innocent. You are just as guilty as them. He died for your crimes as well as those.
Or do you think yourself better than they?
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
First, I replied to quotes not knowing who said them. They were in quotes, the author of the quotes were not given.
Second I stand by what I said.

So Ryrie, Chafer, Ironside, and Old Regular were/are unsaved?

That is pretty harsh DHK. I know you are moderator but you are not God!
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
So Ryrie, Chafer, Ironside, and Old Regular were/are unsaved?

That is pretty harsh DHK. I know you are moderator but you are not God!
Really, Is God "just an afterthought"?
or more specifically:
"There is nothing done in the providence of God that is "an afterthought."

Are the "works" that God does just an "afterthought"? Is that what you believe or accuse others of believing. Either that is what you believe or what you are accusing others (dispensationalists of believing). Which is it?
Who believes that the works of God is an afterthought?
Who has the gall to write such vile things about our Almighty Creator?
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
The following is from your post #123. I don't see DHK mentioned!
I didn't have to mention myself because I believe what I said. Yes, I believe my sin put Christ on the cross. I believe he died for me. It was for my sins that he died. And he died for your sins as well. It is unfortunate that you can't read between the lines.
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
So Ryrie, Chafer, Ironside, and Old Regular were/are unsaved?

That is pretty harsh DHK. I know you are moderator but you are not God!

Really, Is God "just an afterthought"?
or more specifically:
"There is nothing done in the providence of God that is "an afterthought."

Are the "works" that God does just an "afterthought"? Is that what you believe or accuse others of believing. Either that is what you believe or what you are accusing others (dispensationalists of believing). Which is it?
Who believes that the works of God is an afterthought?
Who has the gall to write such vile things about our Almighty Creator?

Obviously you did not answer the question DHK. You have questioned my salvation but you have made a habit of doing that in our past debates! You really should ban yourself from the Board. But then I don't expect hell will ever freeze over so you will likely continue to question the salvation of those with whom you disagree.
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Obviously you did not answer the question DHK. You have questioned my salvation but you have made a habit of doing that in our past debates! You really should ban yourself from the Board. But then I don't expect hell will ever freeze over so you will likely continue to question the salvation of those with whom you disagree.
Why should I answer you. You haven't answered me.
My post is clear enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top