A true five-pointer. :saint:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
BC is right. One MUST include cheese w/vinaigrette along with the spinach, garlic, and onions or one cannot be saved. It is not necessary to cook the spinach though, and bleu cheese is also acceptable.
If this is the type of exegesis you would give in telling someone about Christ it would be as a blind person leading another who is blind, and no one would ever come to Christ.one thing is certain...you proved it by using just as much scripture as Y1:laugh::laugh::laugh:
You must deny Scripture to believe that. Six times it says one thousand years, or even the thousand years, being a very specific period of years leaving no room for any allegorization.No...both post and Amill see it as a symbol.....of a literal Period of time the duration of the gospel spreading worldwide....
Revelation 20:1-6
Not when it is made so clear and definite:Certainly a 1000yrs can mean exactly that...or it can be an expression of a large number ....
What is the reference to that verse?ie, The Lord owns the cattle on a thousand hills.... is that all he owns? or can these words represent an idea?
Do you understand the word "simile?"one day with the lord is as a thousand years,and a thousand years as one day...do you see this?
Another figure of speech. It is called hyperbole. Christ didn't mean exactly 490. He meant as often as he was offended, forgive. This was definite hyperbole. Revelation 20 uses no such figure of speech. It uses the definite article "the thousand years."Not when you consider God's use of numbers symbolically in the parables for example........if you forgive a person 7 x70 times....are you done forgiving them?
Do you understand the word "simile?"
"AS" a thousand years, is not a thousand years. It is a simile, a comparison. It speaks of the timelessness of God by using a figure of speech called a simile. Most people recognize this immediately. Quote:
Another figure of speech. It is called hyperbole. Christ didn't mean exactly 490.
Revelation 20 uses no such figure of speech.
First of all the Millennial Kingdom of one thousand years precisely does exist. You spiritualize or allegorize to be more precise, that away.
Revelation 20:1 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.
2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,
3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.
4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
Revelation 20:5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.
6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.
7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
--Words have meanings. Do you agree?
A thousand years means a thousand years. Six times is this phrase used here in these seven phrase. Three times it is used with the definite article "the thousand years," signifying a definite period of time which cannot be allegorized away and demolishes the amillennialist's point of view completely.
It is utter nonsense that you have posted here and in the last post.Of course the words for everare used in other ways in Scripture:
Jeremiah 17:1-4
1. The sin of Judah is written with a pen of iron, and with the point of a diamond: it is graven upon the table of their heart, and upon the horns of your altars;
2 Whilst their children remember their altars and their groves by the green trees upon the high hills.
3 O my mountain in the field, I will give thy substance and all thy treasures to the spoil, and thy high places for sin, throughout all thy borders.
4 And thou, even thyself, shalt discontinue from thine heritage that I gave thee; and I will cause thee to serve thine enemies in the land which thou knowest not: for ye have kindled a fire in mine anger, which shall burn for ever.
It is utter nonsense that you have posted here and in the last post.
You have simply demonstrated that you cannot harmonize scripture.
You don't understand how there can be a millennial kingdom, and how the Jews can also live for eternity? That is sad. Do you think that after 1,000 years God is going to take away their salvation? You don't believe in eternal security??
I just did. It was plain and simple. Yet you did not understand.Stop your nonsensical ranting and harmonize the promise FOR EVER with 1000 years. Then perhaps you will have something to say that is worth reading!
I just did. It was plain and simple. Yet you did not understand.
Here it is how it will work out:
1. They will be raptured BEFORE the Tribulation of seven years begins.
2. God's wrath will be poured out on the wicked of this world for seven years.
3. The Lord will come for the nation of Israel, and defeat her enemies at the end of the Tribulation at the Battle of Armageddon.
"So then all Israel shall be saved."
4. Believing Israel now will enter into the Millennial Kingdom along with Christ and the glorified saints from Heaven.
Note that Israel and the Bride of Christ (NT believers) will co-exist together in the Millennium as Christ reigns over all.
5. When Christ makes a new earth and a new heaven, Israel, as well as we, will continue to live, forever and ever. First a thousand year millennium, and then after the Great White Throne Judgment, for all eternity.
It is really not difficult to understand.
So just how are these earthly Jews going to live on an earth that does not exist anymore.Dispensationalism teaches that an intrinsic and enduring distinction exists between Jews and the Church. The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved, which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity. [Ryrie, Dispensationalism, page 39 ]
Revelation 21:12 And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:
13 On the east three gates; on the north three gates; on the south three gates; and on the west three gates.
14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.
The word "week" simply means "seven," or seventy "sevens" easily translated 490 years (just as it could be days, or months or years, whatever fits the context best.If it's a literal 1,000 years, then how does Daniel's literal 70 weeks become years?
It's just as broad as it is wide...
You quote these men as if they are gods. I really don't care what they say. I get my teaching from the Bible. I have not read them. I study the Bible. And as TND has pointed out, your continual quotations from these sources instead of engaging in debate shows that you don't understand dispensationalism.Furthermore, Chafer says:
Did I say they would never exist anymore? No. I did not. They will exist forevermore. Christ came to redeem them. That is what the Battle of Armageddon was all about. It is presumed that they will be given glorified bodies at that time as John MacArthur suggests. Perhaps you should read one of your fellow Calvinists who seems to understand eschatology a bit more than you do.So just how are these earthly Jews going to live on an earth that does not exist anymore.
There is nothing apocalyptic here. It is description of the New Jerusalem with the names of both the twelve tribes of Jerusalem and the twelve Apostles written int the foundations of the building indicating that both will be there.Originally Posted by DHK![]()
Revelation 21:12 And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:
13 On the east three gates; on the north three gates; on the south three gates; and on the west three gates.
14 And the wall of the city had twelve foundations, and in them the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.You present above Scripture picturing the Church the Bride of Jesus Christ and the New Jerusalem all in apocalyptic language. I must say that is very thoughtful of you DHK.
Revelation 21:9-11
9. And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb’s wife.
10. And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God,
11. Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal;
Now tell us all: Just where are the earthly people, Israel?
If you are so great at harmonizing Scripture then harmonize FOR EVER with the millennial reign.Your inability to harmonize scripture is astounding.
Then obviously the promise that God gave the land to Israel FOR EVER is not to be interpreted literally since you claim that God is going to destroy this present earth which does include the land HE promised to Israel FOR EVER.If you really believe that then you don't believe the promise that Christ will destroy this earth with fire and create a new earth and a new heaven? Is that correct?
TND was apparently schooled the same way you were. Present one passage of Scripture that speaks of the dispensations you claim are Biblical. You can't because these dispensations are straight from the mind of Man, not God!You quote these men as if they are gods. I really don't care what they say. I get my teaching from the Bible. I have not read them. I study the Bible. And as TND has pointed out, your continual quotations from these sources instead of engaging in debate shows that you don't understand dispensationalism.
Jesus Christ died 2000 years ago to redeem those who will believe. Those who reject that redemption HE provided 2000 years ago will join Satan in the Lake of Fire.Did I say they would never exist anymore? No. I did not. They will exist forevermore. Christ came to redeem them. That is what the Battle of Armageddon was all about.
The passage describing the New Jerusalem is sufficient proof, unless one has been brainwashed by dispensational error, that the New Testament Church is one with Spiritual Israel. Paul's discussion of the olive tree teaches the same thing.There is nothing apocalyptic here. It is description of the New Jerusalem with the names of both the twelve tribes of Jerusalem and the twelve Apostles written int the foundations of the building indicating that both will be there.
[/SIZE][/B]I just did. You quoted from 21:9-11 and I quoted from 9:12-14. It is the exact same passage.
The word "week" simply means "seven," or seventy "sevens" easily translated 490 years (just as it could be days, or months or years, whatever fits the context best.
How many weeks are there before one celebrates the "year of Jubilee"?
The seventieth week is a seven year period of Tribulation occurring right before the Millennium. One week of years, as prophesied.
The literal thousand years is obvious from Revelation 20, where thousand is mentioned six times in 7 verses and "the thousand" is mentioned 3 times indicating a very specific time period. It can't be trifled with.
Wow. This conversation is going on? How hard is to just understand that Christ is King??
My mistake for being hasty in writing down the reference and not checking it before posting.No Revelation 21:9-11 is not Revelation 9:12-14. However, the combined passage shows that the Church, the Bride of Jesus Christ, and the New Jerusalem are one and the same. The language describing the New Jerusalem is apparently beyond your comprehension. But one more time: The passage describing the New Jerusalem is sufficient proof, unless one has been brainwashed by dispensational error, that the New Testament Church is one with Spiritual Israel.