Featured Debunking Unconditional Eternal Security: John 15:1-6

Scriptures clearly teach that believers can commit apostasy( John 15:1-6,Romans 11:18-23, Hebrews 6:4-8,10:26-39,2 Peter 2:20-22). I have examined Hebrews 10:39 and amply demonstrated that contrary to Unconditional Eternal Security heretics, the verse teaches the opposite; believers can turn into apostates and objects of the wrath of God.

As I said, this is an uncomfortable truth, but truth is never based on comfort. We must follow it wherever it leads us. The subject portion is important because it records the very words of our Master addressing his disciples.

John 15:1-6 (KJV)
I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. 2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit. 3 Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you. 4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine; no more can ye, except ye abide in me. 5 I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing. 6 If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered; and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.

 

First,
Note that Jesus is addressing his disciples who are 'in him'. They are clean(v3) and are attached to the vine(v5), meaning they have life because they are attached to the source of life. So these are saved individuals. I mean if somebody is in Christ, clean, and attached to the vine the source of life, they can only born again.

Jesus is teaching them the importance of abiding or remaining in him. He is not asking them to join Him but to remain or continue in him....to continue in their present state. Branches must continue in Him if they are to continue enjoying the life flowing from Him.

The believer, by faith, remains in Christ, and they continue producing fruit of faith and life as long as they are in Christ

 

Secondly,
When a branch ceases to remain/abide by faith as evidenced by unfruitfulness, it is cut off.

This is a vivid depiction of apostasy.
The apostate is not somebody who was never in the vine but somebody who did not abide in the vine. They never continued, they never remained.

So in this passage, the subject are not people who have never been in Him,nor is this he 'visible church', but those who ARE in the true vine, in Christ. Branches in the true vine can only be believers.

It is true that the branch cut off is an unbeliever. Even Calvin clearly saw this, but this is subtle digression. Nobody disputes this. The more relevant question and point to ponder is whether the cut off branch was a believer previously attached to the True Vine.

Thidly, the cut off branch withers. Withering means it had life before but it no longer has

 

I hope by now you can see the dilemma of OSAS heretics. They claim once in Christ, you can't fall off because He will keep you bla de bla. But here we have those in Christ and they are being exhorted to REMAIN lest they be cut off.

The heretics don't submit to the truth without a fight. They will fight such obvious truths. How do they go about it? By redefining branches.

Let's start with Calvin

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/calcom35.v.i.html
So according to Calvin, the ones bearing no fruit are a mere ILLUSION. They appear to men to be branches but they are no branches.

Now this is plain dumb because Jesus is not talking about the opinions of men but realities!

Calvin, it is not 'every branch 'in' me, according to the opinion of men..' But rather ' every branch IN ME...'

 

https://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/ted_hildebrandt/ntesources/ntarticles/gtj-nt/smith-john15-gtj.pdf


When I read such statements I laugh in tongues.
First, what is it with the passage that demands 'harmonization'?
The answer is obvious, the passage smashes the idols of OSAS, and instead of accepting the truth of God, it has to be twisted no contorted beyond measure to conform it to preexisitng biases.

Secondly, the standard defense whenever OSAS is confronted is that there are other passages elsewhere that 'clearly teach opposite' of whatever you are saying. It is also clear that there is zero attempt at refuting the Loss of salvation evidently read from the passage by say Arminians. They just say the interpretation conflicts 'other clear teachings elsewhere'. Makes you wonder whether there is any ambiguity in the subject verses.

Thirdly, note the defensive statement that. It is not dishonest...', did somebody say it was dishonest? Nobody accuses them but their own conscience

When will we learn to let scriptures speak to us? This is no exegesis but Eisegesis. It is a determination to obscure the truth by whatever means possible. When studying eternal security, it is highly unwise to take a position as a given. But this is exactly what they do.

I strongly suggest an honest examination of the counterarguments presented on this document. Before you are halfway done, it will be clear that the attempt at 'harmonization' is anything but honest.

 

@Iconoclast,
I note you have disagreed with all the posts and also disliked them. I wish you would take some time and explain exactly why you disagree and dislike what I wrote.

God bless

 

John 15:2 (KJV)
Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.

There is an argument I have come across that can be broken down thus;
1. Every believer MUST produce fruit
2. The branches cast off from v2 do not bear any fruit

Conclusion
The unfruitful branches are unbelievers,......'professing unbelievers' IN CHRIST. They can't possibly be believers for if they were, they'd producing fruit.

To this I respond that, it is true the cast off branches are unfruitful, but this does not negate the possibility that they were once fruitful or had fruit in the past. It only means PRESENTLY they have no fruit.

To support this point, let us focus on the branches that are cast off
1. The cast off branches are the unfruitful ones-v2
2. The cast off branches abide not in Christ - v6


And finally,
3. Abiding branches bring forth fruit...they are fruitful-v5

CONCLUSION
Unfruitfulness is a consequence of not abiding, and while one abides they bear fruit and this ceases when they stop abiding.

The whole point of the passage is to encourage the disciples to abide, to remain in Christ. This would be pretty irrelevant if they can't but abide and bear fruit. But there is the risk of failure to abide resulting into unfruitfulness and casting away, withering and being cast into fire.

 

My favorite verse;
Proverbs 17:28 (KJV)
Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise:
and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.

 

Jesus is telling the disciples to remain in Him.
He vividly describes the fiery consequences of failure to abide in him namely no fruit, casting away, withering and burning. Obviously this is a warning with an incentive (in this case being avoiding being cut off).

Why would Jesus warn them over something they'd never do?

 

It is not those disagreeing with me who are heretics but those who oppose scriptures

You'd need to demonstrate how any of these scriptures 'contradict' with my understanding of the scriptures just shared

Very true but some are conditional. Those who perished in the wilderness are a perfect example

Salvation is conditional. Received by faith, maintained by faith.

This is contradictory as you can get.

Do you consider yourself as one of those saints of God who will persevere to the end?

 

Ok

I have the scriptures with me, what I don't understand is how you think they contradict any of what I said. Explain that

The NEW is conditioned on FAITH without which it is impossible to please God

Which means the havenots who end up in hell were NEVER given no faith to receive salvation which is given by grace,right?

Indulge me...teach me Rabbi

And on the basis of this trust, can you say you will never apostasize?

 

Ok

Ok

Really?

It seems then the only test of a sheep is continuity of belief till He returns or calls you home, is this so?

May I presume that you@Martin Marprelate are still believing in Jesus so you regard yourself as part of His sheep?

Ok

The recipients of life are those hearing and following. Question is, do they still remain sheep when they are not hearing nor following?

Excellent point,
In other words the only test of a sheep is perseverance of their faith, right?
But the only way we can tell your faith will persevere is by your death, for you may have persevered 30 years only to 'go out from among us' the next year. During your 30 years of perseverance, you thought you were sheep. And you were sheep seeing you heard his voice and followed. But then in your 31st year you 'went out from among us'. And now that you have gone, we know you were 'not of us'!

Your interpretation of 1John 2:19 makes apostasy, or 'going out from among us' the marker of a sheep. Sheep NEVER go out while goats go out at some point . What makes you think you are a sheep who will hold on to the end and not a sheep-looking goat that will throw away their faith in future?

Is this gift of faith available to ALL men?

Very true,but before they come to Christ in Faith, Christ would have to have given them that faith seeing faith is a gift, right?

Is this gift of faith available to all men?

 

I'm still waiting for a rebuttal or the joke whichever comes first...wait......looks like the joke came firstLaughRoflmao