Dr. White's Video Presentation

[SovereignGrace]

Care to answer this one Van? Or, do you want to pretend it never happened and hide from it?

You claimed the passage was not soteriological in the past, then argue later that it is.

Totally inconsistent and an abuse of Scripture on your part.

2 Timothy 2:15 perhaps?

When your theology is all over the place, that's what you get Brother...

 

[Internet Theologian]

When your theology is all over the place, that's what you get Brother...

Yep, and his is all over the place. The only answer he needs to come up with on his misusing that text and talking out both sides of his mouth on it is to say he is wrong. I'd expect a Christian to have that type of character, so we shall see what type of character comes to the surface.

 

[SovereignGrace]

Mr. Tassi said Romans 9 was not soteriological but dispensational. You think his name is Steve Van Tassi?

 

[SovereignGrace]

Come on, Vano, you started this thread, we're bashing you to bits. Man up, son, man up!!!

 

[rsr]

This thread is just a continuation of the bickering and name calling found on another thread that has been closed. It is no more edifying than the other and is now closed. When, or if, the posters can manage to debate the issue without belittling each other, they can carry on.