Featured Faith being credited as righteousness? Part deux

[Snipped] The biblical theology says we are made righteous, and we become the righteousness of God in Him. Pay no attention to the smoke and smears of the advocates of the nameless doctrine.

The mythology of the nameless doctrine has been exposed. And so on cue, we get smoke and smears.

 

Your own smoke and mirrors was in your claiming in one thread Romans 9 is not soteriological in order to make a point, then in another thread you claim it is soteriolgical to make another falsified point. That my friend is hypocrisy and a false and inconsistent hermeneutic on your part.

I really wish that you would have your understanding enlightened, and, that you would own up to your inconsistent theology and hermeneutic that you've been called on.

Frankly, you're in grave error. You see it, you've been called on it, yet you've not owned yourself for it.

 

From what I've witnessed from Van's take on Scripture is that God is mitigated and man's ability is exalted beyond the true revelation of God's Word.

 

Ready for the smear,

No quote will be forthcoming to support this slander. Anyone who pays attention to these references to posts supposedly made in the past, but conveniently without a specific reference for verification, is naive.

 

You're fibbing, no one has slandered you and what I stated is true. In the now closed thread of 'Defend Tassi? Defend White'? your argument was that Romans 9 is not soteriological and you went on to mock White tying it into the golden chain of redemption.

Since that time in your own thread, you claimed it is soteriological to try to force it to defend your position.

See, that is the thing, you have an inconsistent theology and you twist the Word of God to fit what you believe. According to your practice, the Word says one thing one day to support Van, and then the opposite the other, to support Van. It's a shameful practice to be frank.

 

What statements? Its a smear.

Both my examples "bolded) the significant difference. Impute is a mistranslation, as clearly indicated at Romans 4:22. The claim that there is no difference is an argument from incredulity, which is a logical fallacy. Again no verse, properly translated even says impute. It is a KJV mistranslation, not found in the NASB, LEB, Ask yourself this folks, if they mean the same thing, why not drop impute and go with credit, or reckon, or count? Too funny indeed.

 

Where is the 'old' button? Please, bring it back.

 

Lets consider the falsehoods the nameless doctrine advocates use to slander me.

You deny the imputation of Christ's righteousness to us...strike one Scripture says we become the righteousness of God in Him. We are made righteous.

You say God chose Jacob over Esau due to their characteristics...strike two Scripture says (Romans 9:11-12) that God chose the younger so that the older would serve the younger.

You say that the unregenerate can will themselves saved...strike three Material false statement. Scripture (Romans 9:16) says men can will to be saved, but to no avail.

You say ppl in Matthew 23:13 were thwarted entrance into heaven, even though they tried really hard...strike four Scripture says they were entering the kingdom until blocked by false teachers.

You say ppl can seek God...strike five Scripture says some people, some of the time seek God, such as the men of Matthew 23:13.

You say the unregenerate can understand the sincere milk of the gospel...strike six Scripture says men of flesh (unregenerate) can understand spiritual milk, 1 Corinthians 3:1-3.

 

Again, no quote will be forthcoming. Slander, smear and then the smoke of denial. Anything to change the subject from the bogus doctrines of ....

 

I'd say I'm surprised at your denial of what you know you stated, and were called on, but I'm not the least bit surprised.

 

By what merit then do we ever get saved?
By our faith, or does God credit to us what Jesus did on the Cross in our stead as the basis of salvation?

And you still have just to say yes/no to if we are clothed by God in robes of Jesus, imputed His own rightousness or not?

 

Hi Yeshua1, I supported my position with scripture. Unless you can cite scripture that differs from the verses I have cited, it is pointless for you to post. Denial of scripture is not something Christians are supposed to do.

Does God credit our faith as righteousness? Yes - Romans 4:4-5, 23-24.
Does God choose us for salvation through faith in the truth? Yes - 2 Thessalonians 2:13
Can men of flesh understand spiritual milk? Yes 1 Corinthians 3:1-3.

Do we by our faith merit salvation? Nope - all our works of righteousness are as filthy rags.
Does any verse say God credits us with Christ's righteousness? Waiting for those claiming this to provide scripture. Scripture does say we are made righteous. Scripture says we become the righteousness of God in Him. Think about it, were we credited with righteousness, or were we made righteous?

Expect more change of subject.

 

Yep. According to Van even God's foreknowledge isn't supernatural. The diminution of God continues on in his false doctrine.