Bannon is Breitbart, just as Pollak is Breitbart.
Hey look! A straight answer.
You smeared Pollak an orthodox jew, simply because he works for Breitbart. Bannon did also. Why would you treat him any differently?
I can guarantee I did not "smear" Pollak since I don't know who he is or even that he existed until you made the accusation. (If he was in the video link you posted earlier, I didn't even click on it.)
The only guy smearing here is you, and you should ashamed.
No sir. I have simply asked some questions with an open mind and you have attacked. I would be a fool to trust Breitbart given my experience with them. You would have me believe a lie.
You are a terrible testimony for Bannon and Trump by your attacks... unless you are simply emulating what they do. If so, I must oppose Bannon.
I refuse to believe unproven unsupported rumors and gossip—especially from professing Christians.
I have told you no rumors or gossip. I simply told you a source was not credible to me. Then I asked you to make a positive case for Bannon and you flipped out. Is there no positive case for Bannon?
You did this with Trump...
Excuse me, when and where have I "done this" with Trump?
...now you're doing it with Breitbart.
I simply said I don't consider them credible (my opinion) and gave a brief explanation why. That is not gossip or an unsupported rumor. And notice, I have not demanded that others share my opinion like you are doing.
Says the person who made a ton of accusations and can't express himself without a link to Breitbart.